Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This patch is a raw application of
find src/ -type f | xargs sed -i -e 's/IS_ENABLED\s*(CONFIG_/CONFIG(/g'
Change-Id: I6262d6d5c23cabe23c242b4f38d446b74fe16b88
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31774
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I91158452680586ac676ea11c8589062880a31f91
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31692
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
PCI config accessors are no longer indirectly included
from <arch/io.h> use <device/pci_ops.h> instead.
Change-Id: I2adf46430a33bc52ef69d1bf7dca4655fc8475bd
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31675
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Everything is wrong here, the Kconfig symbols are only the tip of the
iceberg. Based on Kconfig prompts the SoC code performed pad configu-
rations! I don't see why the person who configures coreboot should have
the board schematics at hand.
As a mitigation, we remove the prompts for UART_DEBUG, which is renamed
to INTEL_LPSS_UART_FOR_CONSOLE (because the former didn't really say
what it's about), and for UART_FOR_CONSOLE in case the former is selec-
ted.
Change-Id: Ibe2ed3cab0bb04bb23989c22da45299f088c758b
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29573
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Idef8c556ac8c05c5e2047a38629422544392cd62
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30200
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Its spreading copies got out of sync. And as it is not a standard header
but used in commonlib code, it belongs into commonlib. While we are at
it, always include it via GCC's `-include` switch.
Some Windows and BSD quirk handling went into the util copies. We always
guard from redefinitions now to prevent further issues.
Change-Id: I850414e6db1d799dce71ff2dc044e6a000ad2552
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28927
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
This is cosmetic change
Before:
ME: Power Management Event : Clean global reset
ME: Progress Phase State : Unknown phase: 0x08 state: 0x10
ME: Power Down Mitigation : NO
ME: FPF status : fused
After:
ME: Power Management Event : Clean Moff->Mx wake
ME: Progress Phase State : Unknown phase: 0x08 state: 0x10
ME: Power Down Mitigation : NO
ME: FPF status : fused
Change-Id: I15c02045d0f94fdb3f4a028585cad488d4ac9aa6
Signed-off-by: Pratik Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27246
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I21680354f33916b7b4d913f51a842b5d6c2ecef3
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27408
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
me_progress_rom_values array provides detailed information maps to ME
HFSTS2 register value.
There is a chance that ME status value might be over the size of
me_progress_rom_values.
This commit adds a check before access the array.
BUG=b:77247550
Change-Id: I5de569c62b94b0595d3d3ea254f50e312e8c11a4
Signed-off-by: Kane Chen <kane.chen@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25425
Reviewed-by: Kevin Chiu <Kevin.Chiu@quantatw.com>
Reviewed-by: Shelley Chen <shchen@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc@marcjonesconsulting.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This change adds a call to heci_reset before attempting to read
ME firmware version. This is important to ensure that both ME and BIOS
are in sync.
BUG=b:76167737
BRANCH=poppy
TEST=Verfied that ME firmware version read does not fail on first boot
after power failure (i.e. removing battery and AC power).
Change-Id: Ib6b39c398d2e1177b087352a4acb8bcf5a9897d6
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/25362
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
This change adds a boot state callback to print ME version after
DEV_ENABLE is complete. Information is printed only if UART_DEBUG is
enabled because talking to ME to get the firmware version adds ~1
second to boot time.
TEST=Verified on Soraka that ME version printed is correct.
Change-Id: I360d5d7420950d5aa255df08be6d7123621b87a8
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23857
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Julien Viard de Galbert <jviarddegalbert@online.net>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
TEST=Ensures global reset could able to reset system.
Change-Id: I11ce1812a5a0aa2da6b414555374460d606e220e
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/22395
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
The ME status is the interpretation of the status registers, but
having the actual status registers printed is important and it doesn't
hurt to show them.
Change-Id: I6ef3401b36fedfa8aed14f4a62bdbec3d8c6d446
Signed-off-by: Youness Alaoui <youness.alaoui@puri.sm>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21960
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
As per discussion with CSME team, ME is NOT using PCI Config
Space register HFSTS2 Bit 10 to update ME power-gated status.
ME goes to CM0-PG state after ME device becomes idle after
Bit 2 of MMIO register offset 0x800 (D0i3 Control - HECI1_D0I3C)
is being set.
And to retrieve the PG status of ME, one should read from the
PWRMBASE+offset 0x590 (which should give the value 0xF9) and
PWRMBASE+offset 0x594 (which should give the value 0xFF).
But, also it needs some time for the ME FW to go to idle state
and reflect these values in PWRMBASE registers after D0i3 bit
is being set. This does not happen instantly.
So, in coreboot, if we read the ME PG state in finalize.c, which
happens just after FSP Notify phase, where actually ME D0i3 bit
is set, we do not read the correct PG state values (i.e, 0xF9
and 0xFF).
But, once it boots to Kernel, if we read those same registers
through iotool mmio_read32 command, we get correct values.
So, removing the ME PG state prints from coreboot, since it is
actually showing wrong information, although ME Power Gating is
successful.
Change-Id: Idd31a9803b4c9db7d4bb8bbec5374583a8df0c41
Signed-off-by: Barnali Sarkar <barnali.sarkar@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20172
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
As per GCC 7.1 compiler struct reset_reply is considered
as uninitialized inside send_heci_reset_message function.
Change-Id: Ide53a9267dfba1a00263ada1d7016a48ecb9aad8
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20739
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
Also unify __attribute__ ((..)) to __attribute__((..)) and
handle ((__packed__)) like ((packed))
Change-Id: Ie60a51c3fa92b5009724a5b7c2932e361bf3490c
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15921
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Field Programmable Fuses (FPF) status maintained by
CSME in bits 30:31 of FWSTS6 for Skylake and Kabylake.
FPF committed means CSME has blown the fuses.
Change-Id: If63c7874e6c894749df8100426faca0ad432384b
Signed-off-by: Pratik Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19747
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch to make common PCI device name between APL and SKL.
Change-Id: I5e4c7502e9678c0a367e9c7a96cf848d5b24f68e
Signed-off-by: Barnali Sarkar <barnali.sarkar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18576
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Fix the following errors and warnings detected by checkpatch.pl:
ERROR: code indent should use tabs where possible
ERROR: Macros with complex values should be enclosed in parentheses
ERROR: "foo * bar" should be "foo *bar"
ERROR: space required before the open parenthesis '('
ERROR: spaces required around that '=' (ctx:VxW)
WARNING: space prohibited between function name and open parenthesis '('
WARNING: storage class should be at the beginning of the declaration
WARNING: char * array declaration might be better as static const
WARNING: please, no space before tabs
WARNING: braces {} are not necessary for single statement blocks
WARNING: else is not generally useful after a break or return
WARNING: static const char * array should probably be static const char * const
TEST=Build for glados
Change-Id: Ic14ca3abd193cfe257504a55ab6b74782b26bf6d
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18868
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
Fix the following warning detected by checkpatch:
WARNING: line over 80 characters
TEST=Build for glados
Change-Id: I79341f46ca06ac052f987975ccaf975470d27806
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <Leroy.P.Leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18867
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
|
|
As per ME BWG, there are two mechanism to generate a Global
Reset (resets both host and Intel ME), one is through CF9h
IO write of 6h or Eh with "CF9h Global Reset" (CF9GR) bit set,
PMC PCI offset ACh[20]. Another is to issue the Global Reset
MEI message. Because any attempts to cause global reset without
synchronizing the two sides might cause unwanted side effects,
such as unwritten flash data that will get destroyed if the
host were to cause a global reset without informing Intel ME
firmware, the recommended method is to send a Global Reset MEI
message when the following conditions are met:
The PCH chipset firmware just needs to complete the Intel ME
Interface #1 initialization and check the Intel ME HFSTS state
if Intel ME is not in ERROR state and is accepting MEI commands
then firmware should be able to use Global Reset MEI message to
trigger global reset.
Furthermore, if Intel ME is in ERROR state, BIOS can use I/O 0xCF9
write of 0x06 or 0x0E command with PCH ETR3 register bit [20]
to perform the global reset.
BUG=none
BRANCH=none
TEST=Verified Global Reset MEI message is able to perform platform
global issue in ME good state.
Change-Id: If326a137eeadaa695668b76b84c510e12c546024
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/16902
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Add the files to support the Skylake SOC.
Matches chromium tree at 927026db
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build and run on a Skylake platform
Change-Id: I80248f7e47eaf13b52e3c7ff951eb1976edbaa15
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10341
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Use the Broadwell implementation as the comparison base for Skylake.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=None
Change-Id: I22eb55ea89eb0d6883f98e4c72a6d243e819e6d8
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10340
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|