| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
FSP should not lock CMOS unconditionally. coreboot sends Silicon
UPD parameter "RtcLock" to FSP to take action on CMOS
region locking/un-locking. This patch has CB generic code for
creating the Silicon UPD paramater.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44484
BRANCH=none
TEST=Build and booted in kunimitsu, tested using below command-
When DIsabled RtcLock from devicetree in coreboot, booted to kernel
and run following commands -
>> crossystem fw_result=success
>> crossystem | grep fw_result
It should reflect the value that is set. Here, success.
If ENabled RtcLock from Coreboot devicetree, The same commands will
fail to update the fw_result status from crossystem utility.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:*229144
Change-Id: I7f63332097cdaf6eedefbc84bec69ce4e9cc59d7
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: c7b8293a2c55117d7ca2001ac9ec0de24d35b80b
Original-Change-Id: If708e2c782644dcf7f03785d1bfa235ef5385d80
Original-Signed-off-by: Barnali Sarkar <barnali.sarkar@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/297980
Original-Commit-Ready: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Original-Tested-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11655
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
FSP has some unique attributes which makes integration
cumbersome:
1. FSP header files do not include the types they need. Like
EDKII development it's expected types are provided by the
build system. Therefore, one needs to include the proper
files to avoid compilation issues.
2. An implementation of FSP for a chipset may use different
versions of the UEFI PI spec implementation. EDKII is a
proxy for all of UEFI specifications. In order to provide
flexibility one needs to binding a set of types and
structures from an UEFI PI implementation.
3. Each chipset FSP 1.1 implementation has a FspUpdVpd.h
file which defines it's own types. Commonality between
FSP chipset implementations are only named typedef
structs. The fields within are not consistent. And
because of FSP's insistence on typedefs it makes it
near impossible to forward declare structs.
The above 3 means one needs to include the correct UEFI
type bindings when working with FSP. The current
implementation had the SoC picking include paths in the
edk2 directory and using a bare <uefi_types.h> include.
Also, with the prior fsp_util.h implementation the SoC's
FSP FspUpdVpd.h header file was required since for providing
all the types at once (Generic FSP 1.1 and SoC types).
The binding has been changed in the following manner:
1. CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING option added which FSP 1.1
selects. No other bindings are currently available,
but this provides the policy.
2. Based on CONFIG_UEFI_2_4_BINDING the proper include
paths are added to the CPPFLAGS_common.
3. SoC Makefile.inc does not bind UEFI types nor does
it adjust CPPFLAGS_common in any way.
4. Provide a include/fsp directory under fsp1_1 and
expose src/drivers/intel/fsp1_1/include in the
include path. This split can allow a version 2,
for example, FSP to provide its own include files.
Yes, that means there needs to be consistency in
APIs, however that's not this patch.
5. Provide a way for code to differentiate the FSP spec
types (fsp/api.h) from the chipset FSP types
(fsp/soc_binding.h). This allows for code re-use that
doesn't need the chipset types to be defined such as
the FSP relocation code.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44827
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted on glados.
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adubin@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I894165942cfe36936e186af5221efa810be8bb29
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11606
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
The USB port enable/disable settings were never getting applied to
the UPD configuration and so were not getting used by FSP.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44662
BRANCH=none
TEST=build and boot on glados
Change-Id: I13d4eb901215308de4b59083339832d29ce0049f
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 4fd83caa8087cc349fa933eafac98c2563f501a4
Original-Change-Id: Ia5fa051782eeb837756a14aecb4aa626d25b2bdb
Original-Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/296034
Original-Commit-Ready: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11547
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
The acpi_fill_ssdt_generator function pointer is evaluated for
each device. As there are multiple cpus in the system the
acpi_fill_ssdt_generator was being called more than once creating
duplicate ACPI entries because there was more than 1 cpu device.
Fix this by only generating them once by removing the
acpi_fill_ssdt_generator for the cpu devices, but add the
generator to the cpu cluster device.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:44084
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted on glados. Noted ACPI entries only generated once.
Original-Change-Id: I695c30e6150f6d3a79d13744c532f1b658b10402
Original-Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/294240
Original-Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Original-Commit-Queue: Leroy P Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Change-Id: I7c85f44ba65398bda668e13db8be531535a983c5
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11285
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Update the MemoryInit and SilicoInit params as per
FSP 1.3.0 release.
Note: add SvGv and Rmt to Upd.
BRANCH=None
BUG=None
TEST=Build and Boot FAB3 (Kunimitsu)
CQ-DEPEND=CL:*226035, CL:*226045
Original-Change-Id: I62000f6a485fee42ef733c3b548192f2bedfce49
Original-Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Original-Signed-off-by: Robbie Zhang <robbie.zhang@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/291573
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Tested-by: Wenkai Du <wenkai.du@intel.com>
Change-Id: Iaafa658b4e710fe512526a521cf6c529efb19bf0
Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Robbie Zhang <robbie.zhang@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11238
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
The fspNotify(EnumInitPhaseAfterPciEnumeration) is already
registered in fsp_util.c as a generic callback, this is some code
left from early development.
Also I don't see a need for the chip_final function, although we
could keep it as a placeholder but i decided to remove it.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:42979
BRANCH=None
TEST=build with current fsp and the coming fsp 1.3.0, boot on sklrvp3.
Change-Id: Ia892f2021be324859c344b4cb8cdeaf75f7ee32f
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: ae22ad57ddbab787da000ae99f85fd2b3d4092e7
Original-Change-Id: I41be566da71f80451ff70ddd8ada77bf9b8d5b1d
Original-Signed-off-by: robbie zhang <robbie.zhang@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/287991
Original-Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11054
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
Add the files to support the Skylake SOC.
Matches chromium tree at 927026db
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build and run on a Skylake platform
Change-Id: I80248f7e47eaf13b52e3c7ff951eb1976edbaa15
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10341
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Use the Broadwell implementation as the comparison base for Skylake.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=None
Change-Id: I22eb55ea89eb0d6883f98e4c72a6d243e819e6d8
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10340
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
