summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/soc/intel/jasperlake
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-04-17soc/intel: Disable config option for SCS by defaultDuncan Laurie
The eMMC/SD interface is not present in all Intel platforms so this change removes the default enable for the storage controller and instead enables it in the specific SoCs that do provide it. Currently this includes all platforms except Tigerlake. Change-Id: I8b6cab41dbd5080f4a7801f01279f47e80ceaefd Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40371 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2020-04-14soc/intel/jasperlake: Allow mainboard to override DRAM part numberMarco Chen
In order to support mainboards that do not store DRAM part number in the traditional way i.e. within the CBFS SPD for soldered memory, this change provides a runtime callback to allow mainboards to provide DRAM part number from a custom location e.g. external EEPROM on dedede. For other boards it should be a NOP since the weak implementation of mainboard_get_dram_part_num does nothing. BUG=b:152019429 Change-Id: I7ba635f5504ba288308d7d7a4935f405f289aa8d Signed-off-by: Marco Chen <marcochen@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40302 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2020-04-10soc/intel/jasperlake: Publish EMMC and SD card ACPI devicesAamir Bohra
BUG=b:150872580 TEST=Build waddledoo board. Verify EMMC and SD card ACPI devices are present in dsdt.asl. Change-Id: I70d47455c48990afe9e79c013c5272d70f4f71e7 Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39582 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com> Reviewed-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
2020-04-10soc/intel/jasperlake: Publish single GPIO ACPI deviceAamir Bohra
Current pin-ctrl kernel v5.4 driver expects the firmware to publish single GPIO ACPI device. Until kernel pin-ctrl driver implementation is updated to consume community based GPIO ACPI device, update the current ACPI code to comply with pin-ctrl driver requirement. BUG=b:150154277 TEST=Verify intel pin-ctrl driver can successfully load in OS Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com> Change-Id: Ifcc92adaee550182ab405541ea85019f31bb8658 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39470 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com> Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
2020-04-10Replace DEVICE_NOOP with noop_(set|read)_resourcesNico Huber
`.read_resources` and `.set_resources` are the only two device operations that are considered mandatory. Other function pointers can be left NULL. Having dedicated no-op implementations for the two mandatory fields should stop the leaking of no-op pointers to other fields. Change-Id: I6469a7568dc24317c95e238749d878e798b0a362 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40207 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-10Drop unnecessary DEVICE_NOOP entriesNico Huber
Providing an explicit no-op function pointer is only necessary for `.read_resources` and `.set_resources`. All other device-operation pointers are optional and can be NULL. Change-Id: I3d139f7be86180558cabec04b8566873062e33be Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40206 Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-06soc/intel/jasperlake: Use SPDX for GPL-2.0-only filesAngel Pons
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now. Change-Id: I2efdeb224c478995d393aa3eaac762c876832391 Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40216 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
2020-04-06soc/intel/jasperlake: Remove DDI A lane programmingRonak Kanabar
For newer Intel graphics (>=11), the DDI port max lanes default to 4. And kernel driver no longer relies on coreboot to provide information via DDI_BUF_CTL_A (for DDI port A) register programming. Hence removing this code. BUG=b:150788968 BRANCH=None TEST=checked jslrvp compilation and boot. Change-Id: I4c171ec6a57d6fc53bee88420bfb3c0fbc5dc057 Signed-off-by: Ronak Kanabar <ronak.kanabar@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40038 Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com> Reviewed-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-05fsp2_0: Gather Kconfig declarationsNico Huber
Move more Kconfig declarations to drivers/intel/fsp2_0/ and document them properly. This way, we don't have to repeat dependencies and have the prompts in a common place. We can also easily hide the prompt for the header path in case the FSP repository is used. SP platforms were skipped as their Kconfig is too weird but they shouldn't hold other platforms back. Change-Id: Iba5af49bcd15427e9eb9b111e6c4cc9bcb7adcae Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40125 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
2020-04-02Trim `.acpi_fill_ssdt_generator` and `.acpi_inject_dsdt_generator`Nico Huber
These two identifiers were always very confusing. We're not filling and injecting generators. We are filling SSDTs and injecting into the DSDT. So drop the `_generator` suffix. Hopefully, this also makes ACPI look a little less scary. Change-Id: I6f0e79632c9c855f38fe24c0186388a25990c44d Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39977 Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de> Reviewed-by: David Guckian Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-01soc/intel/{tgl,jsl}: Use soc/intel/jasperlake for Jasper Lake SoCAamir Bohra
Switch to using Jasper Lake SoC code from soc/intel/jasperlake and stop referring from soc/intel/tigerlake. Addtionally mainboard changes are done to support build. BUG=b:150217037 TEST=Build and boot waddledoo. Build jasperlake_rvp and volteer board. Change-Id: I39f117bd66cb610a305bcdb8ea65332fd0ff4814 Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39825 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
2020-03-28soc/intel/jasperlake: Remove Tiger Lake SoC code from Jasper LakeAamir Bohra
This is a follow-up patch to initial copy patch for Jasper Lake SoC. Remove all Tiger Lake specfic code from Jasper Lake SoC code. BUG=b:150217037 Change-Id: I44dc6bf55ca18a3f0c350f5c3e9fae2996958648 Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39824 Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com> Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-03-28soc/intel/jasperlake: Add Jasper Lake SoC supportAamir Bohra
This is a copy patch from Tiger Lake SoC code. The only changes done on top of copy is changing below configs: 1. SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE -> SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE_COPY 2. SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE -> SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE_COPY 3. SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE_BASE -> SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE_BASE_COPY We started with initial assumption that JSL and TGL can co-exist. But now we see the SoC code in Tiger Lake is relying on too many compile-time directives to make two SoCs co-exist. Some of the differences are listed below: -> Kconfig: Multiple Kconfig options using if SOC_INTEL_{TIGERLAKE/JASPERLAKE} -> GPIO: GPIO communities have their own differences. This requires conditional checks in gpio.asl, gpio.c, gpio*.h, pmc.h and gpio.asl -> PCI IRQs: Set up differently for JSL and TGL -> PCIe: Number of Root ports differ. -> eMMC/SD: Only supported on JSL. -> USB: Number of USB port are different for JSL and TGL. -> Memory configuration parameters are different for JSL and TGL. -> FSP parameters for JSL and TGL are different. The split of JSL and TGL SoC code is planned as below: 1. Copy Tiger Lake SoC code as is, and change SoC Kconfig to avoid conflicts with current mainboard builds. 2. Clean up TGL code out of copy patch done in step 1. Make it JSL only code. The SoC config still kept as SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE_COPY. 3. Change JSL SOC Kconfig from SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE_COPY to SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE, dedede and jasperlake_rvp boards can bind to SoC code from soc/intel/jasperlake. This step establishes Jasper Lake as a separate SoC. 4. Clean up current JSL code from TGL code. This step establishes Tiger Lake as a separate SoC. BUG=b:150217037 Change-Id: I9c33f478a2f8ed5e2d8e7815821d13044d35d388 Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39823 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>