| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Current implementation returns the incorrect GPIO community PID.
The GPIO community index 3 should return PID for COMM_4 and index
4 should return PID for COMM_5.
TEST=Verify GPIO PM bits are correctly set through MS0x ACPI method.
Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com>
Change-Id: I3da4945e93605a297baff076295433164fdf613d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41721
Reviewed-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: EricR Lai <ericr_lai@compal.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add method acpi method GPID to return the GPIO PCR port ID.
This method is further planned to be used for GPIO power
management configuration.
TEST=Build waddledoo board
Change-Id: Ic45b40bbe39e303cddcc82e0e848786b7311ab64
Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41501
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
|
|
Stefan thinks they don't add value.
Command used:
sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool)
The exceptions are for:
- crossgcc (patch file)
- gcov (imported from gcc)
- elf.h (imported from GNU's libc)
- nvramtool (more complicated header)
The removed lines are:
- fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */")
-# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available
-/* This file is part of coreboot */
-# This file is part of msrtool.
-/* This file is part of msrtool. */
- * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in
-/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */
- * This file is part of the coreboot project.
- /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-## This file is part of the coreboot project.
--- This file is part of the coreboot project.
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project */
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-;## This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the
- * This file is part of the coreinfo project.
-## This file is part of the coreinfo project.
- * This file is part of the depthcharge project.
-/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */
-/* This file is part of the ectool project. */
- * This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- * This file is part of the libpayload project.
-## This file is part of the libpayload project.
-/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */
-## This file is part of the superiotool project.
-/* This file is part of the superiotool project */
-/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */
Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Current pin-ctrl kernel v5.4 driver expects the firmware to publish
single GPIO ACPI device. Until kernel pin-ctrl driver implementation is
updated to consume community based GPIO ACPI device, update the current
ACPI code to comply with pin-ctrl driver requirement.
BUG=b:150154277
TEST=Verify intel pin-ctrl driver can successfully load in OS
Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com>
Change-Id: Ifcc92adaee550182ab405541ea85019f31bb8658
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39470
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I2efdeb224c478995d393aa3eaac762c876832391
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40216
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
|
|
This is a copy patch from Tiger Lake SoC code.
The only changes done on top of copy is changing below configs:
1. SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE -> SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE_COPY
2. SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE -> SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE_COPY
3. SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE_BASE -> SOC_INTEL_TIGERLAKE_BASE_COPY
We started with initial assumption that JSL and TGL can co-exist.
But now we see the SoC code in Tiger Lake is relying on too many
compile-time directives to make two SoCs co-exist. Some of the
differences are listed below:
-> Kconfig: Multiple Kconfig options using
if SOC_INTEL_{TIGERLAKE/JASPERLAKE}
-> GPIO: GPIO communities have their own differences.
This requires conditional checks in gpio.asl, gpio.c, gpio*.h,
pmc.h and gpio.asl
-> PCI IRQs: Set up differently for JSL and TGL
-> PCIe: Number of Root ports differ.
-> eMMC/SD: Only supported on JSL.
-> USB: Number of USB port are different for JSL and TGL.
-> Memory configuration parameters are different for JSL and TGL.
-> FSP parameters for JSL and TGL are different.
The split of JSL and TGL SoC code is planned as below:
1. Copy Tiger Lake SoC code as is, and change SoC Kconfig
to avoid conflicts with current mainboard builds.
2. Clean up TGL code out of copy patch done in step 1.
Make it JSL only code. The SoC config still kept as
SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE_COPY.
3. Change JSL SOC Kconfig from SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE_COPY to
SOC_INTEL_JASPERLAKE, dedede and jasperlake_rvp boards can
bind to SoC code from soc/intel/jasperlake. This step establishes
Jasper Lake as a separate SoC.
4. Clean up current JSL code from TGL code. This step establishes
Tiger Lake as a separate SoC.
BUG=b:150217037
Change-Id: I9c33f478a2f8ed5e2d8e7815821d13044d35d388
Signed-off-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39823
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
|
