Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Change-Id: I17c4fc4e3e2eeef7c720c6a020b37d8f7a0f57a4
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29300
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
There used to be a need for an empty smm_init() function
because initialize_cpus() called it even though nothing
called initialize_cpus(). However, garbage collection at
link time is implemented so there's no reason to provide an
empty function to satisfy a symbol that is completely culled
during link. Remove it.
Change-Id: Ic13c85f1d3d57e38e7132e4289a98a95829f765a
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14605
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
Update all of the license headers to make sure they are compliant
with coreboot's license header policy.
Change-Id: I151d058615290e528d9d1738c17804f6b9cc8dce
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14321
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This is to match the layout of the non-fsp baytrail to make comparisons
easier and possibly remove duplicate files.
Change-Id: I9a94842d724ab3826de711d398227e7bdc1045ff
Signed-off-by: Ben Gardner <gardner.ben@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12686
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
While similar to the Bay Trail-M/D code based on the MRC, there are
many differences as well:
- Obviously, uses the FSP instead of the MRC binaries.
- FSP does additional hardware setup, so coreboot doesn't need to.
- Different microcode & microcode loading method
- Uses the cache_as_ram.inc from the FSP Driver
- Various other changes in support of the FSP
Additional changes that don't have to to with the FSP vs MRC:
- Updated IRQ Routing
- Different FADT implementation.
This was validated with FSP:
BAYTRAIL_FSP_GOLD_002_10-JANUARY-2014.fd
SHA256: d29eefbb33454bd5314bfaa38fb055d592a757de7b348ed7096cd8c2d65908a5
MD5: 9360cd915f0d3e4116bbc782233d7b91
Change-Id: Iadadf8cd6cf444ba840e0f76d3aed7825cd7aee4
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5791
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|