coreboot.git - my copy of coreboot

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2015-10-31	tree: drop last paragraph of GPL copyright header	Patrick Georgi
	It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address. Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we imported) looks out for that. This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further editing. Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2015-05-21	Remove address from GPLv2 headers	Patrick Georgi
	As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons but because there are tools that look for them, and giving them a standard pattern simplifies things. However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a new lease, but can drop the address instead. util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that we may want to synchronize every now and then. $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA[, ]02110-1301[, ]USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307[, ]USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -a \! -name \.patch \ -a \! -name \_shipped \ -a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \ -a \! -name LGPL.txt \ -a \! -name COPYING \ -a \! -name DISCLAIMER \ -exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
2015-04-24	fsp: Move fsp to fsp1_0	Marc Jones
	Prepare for FSP 1.1 integration by moving the FSP to a FSP 1.0 specific directory. See follow-on patches for sharing of common code. Change-Id: Ic58cb4074c65b91d119909132a012876d7ee7b74 Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9970 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2014-12-05	fsp_baytrail: Kconfig update for Gold 3 FSP	Martin Roth
	The documentation for the FSP gives the name as BAYTRAIL_FSP.fd instead of the old FvFsp.bin. Change-Id: I69c7c5ff49afd6552612cf50c9ca9b30cfb003e2 Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7648 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
2014-06-23	fsp_baytrail: Minor Kconfig updates	Martin Roth
	- remove the Kconfig text when setting the default for the FSP location. The text was showing up twice in the config menu. - Remove an extra 'the' in the help text. Change-Id: I3777833bf32e19bbe5a8493578a9346d6ab062a4 Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6090 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2014-06-18	fsp_baytrail: Add the default FSP location	Martin Roth
	The default FSP location needs to be in the chipset, not the mainboard. This was removed from the Bayley Bay mainboard in patch 41ea7230f7 reviewed at http://review.coreboot.org/#/c/5982/ Change-Id: Ia26ed34e1401cbd2303166628e7a4e357d79c874 Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5985 Reviewed-by: Dave Frodin <dave.frodin@se-eng.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
2014-05-29	fsp_baytrail: Add the FSP version of Intel's Bay Trail-I chip	Martin Roth
	While similar to the Bay Trail-M/D code based on the MRC, there are many differences as well: - Obviously, uses the FSP instead of the MRC binaries. - FSP does additional hardware setup, so coreboot doesn't need to. - Different microcode & microcode loading method - Uses the cache_as_ram.inc from the FSP Driver - Various other changes in support of the FSP Additional changes that don't have to to with the FSP vs MRC: - Updated IRQ Routing - Different FADT implementation. This was validated with FSP: BAYTRAIL_FSP_GOLD_002_10-JANUARY-2014.fd SHA256: d29eefbb33454bd5314bfaa38fb055d592a757de7b348ed7096cd8c2d65908a5 MD5: 9360cd915f0d3e4116bbc782233d7b91 Change-Id: Iadadf8cd6cf444ba840e0f76d3aed7825cd7aee4 Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5791 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>