coreboot.git - my copy of coreboot

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2015-05-21	Remove address from GPLv2 headers	Patrick Georgi
	As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons but because there are tools that look for them, and giving them a standard pattern simplifies things. However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a new lease, but can drop the address instead. util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that we may want to synchronize every now and then. $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA[, ]02110-1301[, ]USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307[, ]USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -a \! -name \.patch \ -a \! -name \_shipped \ -a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \ -a \! -name LGPL.txt \ -a \! -name COPYING \ -a \! -name DISCLAIMER \ -exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
2015-02-16	acpi: Generate valid ACPI processor objects	Timothy Pearson
	The existing code generated invalid ACPI processor objects if the core number was greater than 9. The first invalid object instance was autocorrected by Linux, but subsequent instances conflicted with each other, leading to a failure to boot if more than 10 CPU cores were installed. The modified code will function with up to 99 cores. Change-Id: I62dc0eb61ae2e2b7f7dcf30e9c7de09cd901a81c Signed-off-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8422 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
2014-05-29	fsp_baytrail: Add the FSP version of Intel's Bay Trail-I chip	Martin Roth
	While similar to the Bay Trail-M/D code based on the MRC, there are many differences as well: - Obviously, uses the FSP instead of the MRC binaries. - FSP does additional hardware setup, so coreboot doesn't need to. - Different microcode & microcode loading method - Uses the cache_as_ram.inc from the FSP Driver - Various other changes in support of the FSP Additional changes that don't have to to with the FSP vs MRC: - Updated IRQ Routing - Different FADT implementation. This was validated with FSP: BAYTRAIL_FSP_GOLD_002_10-JANUARY-2014.fd SHA256: d29eefbb33454bd5314bfaa38fb055d592a757de7b348ed7096cd8c2d65908a5 MD5: 9360cd915f0d3e4116bbc782233d7b91 Change-Id: Iadadf8cd6cf444ba840e0f76d3aed7825cd7aee4 Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5791 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>