aboutsummaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/soc/intel/fsp_baytrail/Makefile.inc
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2015-03-05fsp_baytrail: Add I2C driverWerner Zeh
Add a driver wich can handle the internal I2C controllers of Baytrail SoC. This driver is not suitable for the SMBus controller. Change-Id: I841c3991a2fb0f8b92b8e59ec02d62f5866f5bdf Signed-off-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8401 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2015-01-27CBMEM: Do not use get_top_of_ram() with DYNAMIC_CBMEMKyösti Mälkki
The name was always obscure and confusing. Instead define cbmem_top() directly in the chipset code for x86 like on ARMs. TODO: Check TSEG alignment, it used for MTRR programming. Change-Id: Ibbe5f05ab9c7d87d09caa673766cd17d192cd045 Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
2014-12-17fsp_baytrail: Add code to read GPIOs in romstageMartin Roth
- Build gpio.c into romstage - Add functions to translate the GPIO # to a pad #, then return the value read from the GPIO. - Add functions to configure the GPIO - Function, Pull up/down, pull strength, Input/Output, and Output level. Change-Id: Ic37dfc9a74a598023bdf797d31087428adec176a Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7796 Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@gmx.net>
2014-07-17soc,Makefile.inc: Trivial - drop trailing blank lines at EOFEdward O'Callaghan
Change-Id: I6db4eada5be5f9a4340d9edb942924e2fd18b5ca Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6284 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer@gmail.com>
2014-05-29fsp_baytrail: Add the FSP version of Intel's Bay Trail-I chipMartin Roth
While similar to the Bay Trail-M/D code based on the MRC, there are many differences as well: - Obviously, uses the FSP instead of the MRC binaries. - FSP does additional hardware setup, so coreboot doesn't need to. - Different microcode & microcode loading method - Uses the cache_as_ram.inc from the FSP Driver - Various other changes in support of the FSP Additional changes that don't have to to with the FSP vs MRC: - Updated IRQ Routing - Different FADT implementation. This was validated with FSP: BAYTRAIL_FSP_GOLD_002_10-JANUARY-2014.fd SHA256: d29eefbb33454bd5314bfaa38fb055d592a757de7b348ed7096cd8c2d65908a5 MD5: 9360cd915f0d3e4116bbc782233d7b91 Change-Id: Iadadf8cd6cf444ba840e0f76d3aed7825cd7aee4 Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5791 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>