| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The BOOT_STATE_INIT_ENTRY macro can only be used in ramstage, however
the current state of the header meant bad build errors in non-ramstage.
Therefore, people had to #ifdef in the source. Remove that requirement.
Change-Id: I8755fc68bbaca6b72fbe8b4db4bcc1ccb35622bd
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11492
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Provide a common romstage implementation for the Intel SOCs.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build for Braswell
Change-Id: I80f5f8f0f36e9023117b07d4af5c806fff8157b6
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10050
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Instead of being pointer based use the region infrastrucutre.
Additionally, this removes the need for arch-specific compilation
paths. The users of the new API can use the region APIs to memory
map or read the region provided by the new fmap API.
Change-Id: Ie36e9ff9cb554234ec394b921f029eeed6845aee
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9170
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
Add support for applying write protection to the MRC cache
region in SPI flash.
This is only enabled if there is write protect GPIO that is
set, and the flash status register reports that the flash
chip is currently write protected.
Then it will call out to a SOC specific function that will
enable write protection on the RW_MRC_CACHE region of flash.
The implementation is not quite as clean as I would like because
there is not a common flash protect interface across SOCs so
instead it relies on a new Kconfig variable to be set that will
indicate a SOC implements the function to protect a region of
SPI flash.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:28234
BRANCH=broadwell
TEST=build and boot on samus
1) with either WPSW=0 or SRP0=0 the PRR is not applied
2) with both WPSW=1 and SRP0=1 the PRR is applied
Change-Id: If5907b7ddf3f966c546ae32dc99aa815beb27587
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: a3e0e71dfd7339aab171a26b67aec465a3f332d6
Original-Change-Id: I94e54e4723b1dcdacbb6a05f047d0c0ebc7d8711
Original-Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/241170
Original-Reviewed-by: Shawn N <shawnn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9494
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
The GCC 4.9.2 update showed that the boot_state_init_entry
structures were being padded and assumed to be aligned in to an
increased size. The bootstate scheduler for static entries,
boot_state_schedule_static_entries(), was then calculating the
wrong values within the array. To fix this just use a pointer to
the boot_state_init_entry structure that needs to be scheduled.
In addition to the previous issue noted above, the .bs_init
section was sitting in the read only portion of the image while
the fields within it need to be writable. Also, the
boot_state_schedule_static_entries() was using symbol comparison
to terminate a loop which in C can lead the compiler to always
evaluate the loop at least once since the language spec indicates
no 2 symbols can be the same value.
Change-Id: I6dc5331c2979d508dde3cd5c3332903d40d8048b
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8699
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
This common code can be shared across Intel SOCs.
Change-Id: Id9ec4ccd3fc81cbab19a7d7e13bfa3975d9802d0
Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/196263
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit f9919e2551b02056b83918d2e7b515b25541c583)
Signed-off-by: Isaac Christensen <isaac.christensen@se-eng.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6967
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
|
