| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Use C99 flexible arrays instead of older style of one-element or
zero-length arrays.
It allows the compiler to generate errors when the flexible array does
not occur at the end in the structure.
Change-Id: Id19193b960935eeffca8e8db60073321592368fe
Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76836
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Change-Id: I80f3d2c90c58daa62651f6fd635c043b1ce38b84
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/68255
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
This patch changes the Intel MMA driver to use the new CBFS API.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Icc11d0c2a9ec1bd7a1d6af362f849dac16375433
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52282
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
This patch renames cbfs_boot_map_with_leak() and cbfs_boot_load_file()
to cbfs_map() and cbfs_load() respectively. This is supposed to be the
start of a new, better organized CBFS API where the most common
operations have the most simple and straight-forward names. Less
commonly used variants of these operations (e.g. cbfs_ro_load() or
cbfs_region_load()) can be introduced later. It seems unnecessary to
keep carrying around "boot" in the names of most CBFS APIs if the vast
majority of accesses go to the boot CBFS (instead, more unusual
operations should have longer names that describe how they diverge from
the common ones).
cbfs_map() is paired with a new cbfs_unmap() to allow callers to cleanly
reap mappings when desired. A few new cbfs_unmap() calls are added to
generic code where it makes sense, but it seems unnecessary to introduce
this everywhere in platform or architecture specific code where the boot
medium is known to be memory-mapped anyway. In fact, even for
non-memory-mapped platforms, sometimes leaking a mapping to the CBFS
cache is a much cleaner solution than jumping through hoops to provide
some other storage for some long-lived file object, and it shouldn't be
outright forbidden when it makes sense.
Additionally, remove the type arguments from these function signatures.
The goal is to eventually remove type arguments for lookup from the
whole CBFS API. Filenames already uniquely identify CBFS files. The type
field is just informational, and there should be APIs to allow callers
to check it when desired, but it's not clear what we gain from forcing
this as a parameter into every single CBFS access when the vast majority
of the time it provides no additional value and is just clutter.
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ib24325400815a9c3d25f66c61829a24a239bb88e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39304
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Mariusz Szafrański <mariuszx.szafranski@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Stefan thinks they don't add value.
Command used:
sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool)
The exceptions are for:
- crossgcc (patch file)
- gcov (imported from gcc)
- elf.h (imported from GNU's libc)
- nvramtool (more complicated header)
The removed lines are:
- fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */")
-# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available
-/* This file is part of coreboot */
-# This file is part of msrtool.
-/* This file is part of msrtool. */
- * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in
-/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */
- * This file is part of the coreboot project.
- /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-## This file is part of the coreboot project.
--- This file is part of the coreboot project.
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project */
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-;## This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the
- * This file is part of the coreinfo project.
-## This file is part of the coreinfo project.
- * This file is part of the depthcharge project.
-/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */
-/* This file is part of the ectool project. */
- * This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- * This file is part of the libpayload project.
-## This file is part of the libpayload project.
-/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */
-## This file is part of the superiotool project.
-/* This file is part of the superiotool project */
-/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */
Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: Ic5a920bfe1059534566ceab85a97219dd56f069e
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40213
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I4c110f60b764c97fab2a29f6f04680196f156da5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
According to the POSIX standard, %p is supposed to print a pointer "as
if by %#x", meaning the "0x" prefix should automatically be prepended.
All other implementations out there (glibc, Linux, even libpayload) do
this, so we should make coreboot match. This patch changes vtxprintf()
accordingly and removes any explicit instances of "0x%p" from existing
format strings.
How to handle zero padding is less clear: the official POSIX definition
above technically says there should be no automatic zero padding, but in
practice most other implementations seem to do it and I assume most
programmers would prefer it. The way chosen here is to always zero-pad
to 32 bits, even on a 64-bit system. The rationale for this is that even
on 64-bit systems, coreboot always avoids using any memory above 4GB for
itself, so in practice all pointers should fit in that range and padding
everything to 64 bits would just hurt readability. Padding it this way
also helps pointers that do exceed 4GB (e.g. prints from MMU config on
some arm64 systems) stand out better from the others.
Change-Id: I0171b52f7288abb40e3fc3c8b874aee14b9bdcd6
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37626
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
|
|
Drop 'include <string.h>' when it is not used and
add it when it is missing.
Also extra lines removed, or added just before local includes.
Change-Id: Iccac4dbaa2dd4144fc347af36ecfc9747da3de20
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31966
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Its spreading copies got out of sync. And as it is not a standard header
but used in commonlib code, it belongs into commonlib. While we are at
it, always include it via GCC's `-include` switch.
Some Windows and BSD quirk handling went into the util copies. We always
guard from redefinitions now to prevent further issues.
Change-Id: I850414e6db1d799dce71ff2dc044e6a000ad2552
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28927
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Also unify __attribute__ ((..)) to __attribute__((..)) and
handle ((__packed__)) like ((packed))
Change-Id: Ie60a51c3fa92b5009724a5b7c2932e361bf3490c
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15921
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
- Separate mma code for fsp1.1 and fsp2.0
and restructuring the code
- common code is placed in mma.c and mma.h
- mma_fsp<ver>.h and fsp<ver>/mma_core.c contains
fsp version specific code.
- whole MMA feature is guarded by CONFIG_MMA flag.
Change-Id: I12c9a1122ea7a52f050b852738fb95d03ce44800
Signed-off-by: Pratik Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17496
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Set SAGV to 2 (Fixed High) so that MMA test would
stress memory at high freq point. MMA tests does not
support stressing memory at both high and low points.
BRANCH=glados
BUG=chrome-os-partner:43731
TEST=Build and Boot kunimitsu and ran MMA tests.
Change-Id: I0b2f6cf9955076f6146b957c4d40fe24e6c3f0e7
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 4b16b756d9a74c9111c78fce848b059daee65669
Original-Change-Id: I4c4a59407844e1986fa2cf3a0035aff1d8529cf9
Original-Signed-off-by: Pratik Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/339002
Original-Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Original-(cherry picked from commit c43d9880fe4efd1e1bb853d35140424fb7dd7e99)
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/338847
Original-Commit-Ready: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Original-Tested-by: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14697
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
(1) Added following new function.
cbfs_locate_file_in_region - to locate (and mmap) a file in a flash
region
This function is used to look for MMA blobs in "COREBOOT" cbfs region
(2) mma_setup_test.sh would write to "COREBOOT" region.
(3) changes in mma_automated_test.sh. Few MMA tests need system to
be COLD rebooted before test can start. mma_automated_test.sh would
do COLD reboot after each test, and so i would sync the filesystem
before doing COLD reboot.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chrome-os-partner:43731
TEST=Build and Boot kunimitsu (FAB4). Able to locate MMA files in CBFS
Not tested on Glados.
Change-Id: I8338a46d8591d16183e51917782f052fa78c4167
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 1e418dfffd8a7fe590f9db771d2f0b01a44afbb4
Original-Change-Id: I402f84f5c46720710704dfd32b9319c73c412e47
Original-Signed-off-by: Pratik Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/331682
Original-Commit-Ready: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Original-Tested-by: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14125
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This continues what was done in commit a73b93157f2
(tree: drop last paragraph of GPL copyright header)
Change-Id: Ifb8d2d13f7787657445817bdde8dc15df375e173
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/12914
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch implements Memory Margin Analysis feature in coreboot.
Few things to note
(1) the feature is enabled by setting CONFIG_MMA=y in the config file
(2) coreboot reads mma_test_metadata.bin from cbfs during romstage and
gets the name of MMA test name and test config name. Then coreboot finds
these files in CBFS.
If found, coreboot passes location and size of these files to FSP via
UPD params. Sets MrcFastBoot to 0 so that MRC happens and then MMA test
would be executed during memory init.
(3) FSP passes MMA results data in HOB and coreboot saves it in cbmem
(4) when system boots to OS after test is executed cbmem tool is used
to grab the MMA results data.
BRANCH=none
BUG=chrome-os-partner:43731
TEST=Build and Boot kunimitsu (FAB3) and executed MMA tests
Not tested on Glados
CQ-DEPEND=CL:299476,CL:299475,CL:299474,CL:299473,CL:299509,CL:299508,CL:299507,CL:*230478,CL:*230479
Change-Id: I0b4524abcf57db4d2440a06a79b5a0f4b60fa0ea
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 4aba9b728c263b9d5da5746ede3807927c9cc2a7
Original-Change-Id: Ie2728154b49eac8695f707127334b12e345398dc
Original-Signed-off-by: Pratik Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/299476
Original-Commit-Ready: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Original-Tested-by: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-by: Pratikkumar V Prajapati <pratikkumar.v.prajapati@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/12481
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
