Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Remove assert() and instead use if statement to check if
comm->groups is NULL.
Found-by: klockwork
BUG=None
TEST=Boot to OS
Change-Id: I85a6bc700b52d04c61ca8f2baac62000f40cf2cb
Signed-off-by: Bora Guvendik <bora.guvendik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28940
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
This function adds support for gpio_configure_pads_with_override
which:
1. Takes as input two GPIO tables -- base config table and override
config table
2. Configures each pad in base config by first checking if there is a
config available for the pad in override config table. If yes, then
uses the one from override config table. Else, uses the base config to
configure the pad.
This is done to allow sharing of GPIO tables across baseboard-variants
for various boards i.e. Each board can have a base config table which
is provided by the baseboard and an optional override config table
that can be provided by a variant to configure certain GPIOs
differently. It is helpful when the variant GPIO diff list is not very
huge compared to the baseboard.
BUG=b:111743717
TEST=Verified that the GPIO config for phaser is same with and without
this change.
Change-Id: I1c5dc72c8368957201ab53d2e8398ff861341a4c
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27640
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Justin TerAvest <teravest@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The intelblock code is common code already used by appololake and
cannonlake platform. The denverton platform also use a similar gpio
controller so the intelblock code can be used as well.
Change-Id: I7ecfb5a3527e9c893930149f7b847a41c5dd9374
Signed-off-by: Julien Viard de Galbert <jviarddegalbert@online.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/24928
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add group information for each gpio community and use it to
calculate offset of a pad within its group. Original implementation
assumed that the number of gpios in each group is same but that lead to
a bug for cnl since numbers differ for each group.
BUG=b:69616750
TEST=Need to test again on SKL,CNL,APL,GLK
Change-Id: I02ab1d878bc83d32222be074bd2db5e23adaf580
Signed-off-by: Bora Guvendik <bora.guvendik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/22571
Reviewed-by: Lijian Zhao <lijian.zhao@intel.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
for case CONFIG_SOC_INTEL_COMMON_BLOCK_GPIO_PADCFG_PADTOL=y
https://ticket.coreboot.org/issues/128
Signed-off-by: Hannah Williams <hannah.williams@intel.com>
Change-Id: I2b0b9c07ebc99f4b4d7e8c5a72483bedd33e2e07
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/21282
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Youness Alaoui <snifikino@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
The gpio numbers are global, but they have their respective place
within each community and the group within their community. For
all the calculations open coding this calculation convert them to
use the helpers.
Change-Id: I0423490ae1740ef59225a70fea80a7d91ac2a39a
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20653
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
|
|
A pad number is passed into gpi_status_get() to determine if its
associated bit is set from a generated event. However, the
implementation wasn't taking into account the gpi_status_offset
which dictates the starting offset for each community. Additionally,
the max_pads_per_group field is per community as well -- not global.
Fix the code to properly take into account the community's
gpi_status_offset as well as the max_pads_per_group.
Change-Id: Ia18ac6cbac31e3da3ae0ce3764ac33aa9286ac63
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20652
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Hannah Williams <hannah.williams@intel.com>
|
|
1. Explicitly add LOGICAL to the reset macro name to make it explicit
that the values are logical.
2. Reword some of the comments and combine them into single comment
instead of scattering the comments throughout.
3. Use c99 struct initializers for the reset mapping array.
4. For the chipset specific values use literals that match the hardware.
5. Use 'U' suffixes on the literals so we don't trip up compiler being
over zealous on undefined behavior.
6. Use unsigned and fixed-width types for the reset mapping structure
since the code is reliant on matching up with a register definition.
7. Fix formatting that can fit < 80 cols.
Change-Id: Iaa23a319832c05b8a023f6e45c4ee5ac06dd7066
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20589
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
Sadly, small core and big core are not aligned with the OS driver's
expectation on the number of ACPI devices used for each community.
Big core uses a single device while small cores use one ACPI device
per community. Allow for this distinction within the common gpio
implementation and ensure apollolake is utilizing the new option
to retain the correct behavior.
Change-Id: I7c7535c36221139ad6c9adde2df10b80eb5c596a
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20588
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic48401e92103ff0ec278fb69a3d304148a2d79aa
Signed-off-by: Hannah Williams <hannah.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|