Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I4c110f60b764c97fab2a29f6f04680196f156da5
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch keeps required pch_early_init() function like ABASE programming,
GPE and RTC init into bootblock and moves remaining functions like TCO
configuration and SMBus init into romstage/pch.c in order to maintain only
required chipset programming for bootblock and verstage.
Rename the pch_init function to bootblock_pch_init and romstage_pch_init
according to the stage it is defined in.
TEST=Able to build and boot hatch successfully.
Change-Id: Idf7b04edc3fce147f7857561ce7d5b0cd05f43fe
Signed-off-by: Usha P <usha.p@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37308
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
|
|
This patch includes common romstage code to setup the console
and load postcar.
Fix booting regression issue on all latest IA-SOC introduced by CB:34893
Change-Id: I9da592960f20ed9742ff696198dbc028ef519ddf
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35109
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Ronak Kanabar <ronak.kanabar@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
This change moves soc_fill_power_state and soc_prev_sleep_state to
pmutil.c. It allows the functions to be used across romstage and smm.
BUG=b:124131938
BRANCH=none
TEST=none
Change-Id: If24c3feeb77f4fb692ef0bf38d537b2b54de3c36
Signed-off-by: V Sowmya <v.sowmya@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31787
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
Move funtions callbacks used to override FSP upd values to
separate files. This serves as a base change for SoCs for which
FSP is still under development, and hence the FSP header files
are not available yet and in turn the UPDs cannot be referred.
These newer SoCs will implement empty callbacks. The code will
compile with basic header files which only include the architectural
FSP structures.
This allows plugging in these separate files for compilation in an
environment where FSP header files are available.
The fact is, FSP header files are not released externally until PRQ.
However the teams at intel and some partners have access to the development
version of these files. This code refactor helps to continue development
on the pre-PRQ silicons and submit related code to coreboot.org.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Build for cnlrvp
Change-Id: Iffadc57f6986e688aa1bbe4e5444d105386ad92e
Signed-off-by: Rizwan Qureshi <rizwan.qureshi@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28661
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
The following minimal changes are needed to make system boot until FSP
memoryinit got called.
1. Program SA BARs
2. Assume previous power state is S0.
Change-Id: Iab96b27d4220acf4089b901bca28018eaba940a1
Signed-off-by: Lijian Zhao <lijian.zhao@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20497
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|