Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Rename and split functions to match what Haswell does.
Change-Id: I4f3e997dd934bdf7717a70603d9413eae93cf181
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49778
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
|
|
Files under sb/ or soc/ should not have includes that tie those
directly to external components like ChromeEC os ChromeOS
vendorcode.
Change-Id: Ib56eeedaa9d7422e221efa9c8480ed5e12024bca
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48765
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This patch introduces two new CBFS API functions which are equivalent to
cbfs_map() and cbfs_load(), respectively, with the difference that they
always operate on the read-only CBFS region ("COREBOOT" FMAP section).
Use it to replace some of the simple cases that needed to use
cbfs_locate_file_in_region().
Change-Id: I9c55b022b6502a333a9805ab0e4891dd7b97ef7f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39306
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Currently the decision of whether or not to use mrc_cache in recovery
mode is made within the individual platforms' drivers (ie: fsp2.0,
fsp1.1, etc.). As this is not platform specific, but uses common
vboot infrastructure, the code can be unified and moved into
mrc_cache. The conditions are as follows:
1. If HAS_RECOVERY_MRC_CACHE, use mrc_cache data (unless retrain
switch is true)
2. If !HAS_RECOVERY_MRC_CACHE && VBOOT_STARTS_IN_BOOTBLOCK, this
means that memory training will occur after verified boot,
meaning that mrc_cache will be filled with data from executing
RW code. So in this case, we never want to use the training
data in the mrc_cache for recovery mode.
3. If !HAS_RECOVERY_MRC_CACHE && VBOOT_STARTS_IN_ROMSTAGE, this
means that memory training happens before verfied boot, meaning
that the mrc_cache data is generated by RO code, so it is safe
to use for a recovery boot.
4. Any platform that does not use vboot should be unaffected.
Additionally, we have removed the
MRC_CLEAR_NORMAL_CACHE_ON_RECOVERY_RETRAIN config because the
mrc_cache driver takes care of invalidating the mrc_cache data for
normal mode. If the platform:
1. !HAS_RECOVERY_MRC_CACHE, always invalidate mrc_cache data
2. HAS_RECOVERY_MRC_CACHE, only invalidate if retrain switch is set
BUG=b:150502246
BRANCH=None
TEST=1. run dut-control power_state:rec_force_mrc twice on lazor
ensure that memory retraining happens both times
run dut-control power_state:rec twice on lazor
ensure that memory retraining happens only first time
2. remove HAS_RECOVERY_MRC_CACHE from lazor Kconfig
boot twice to ensure caching of memory training occurred
on each boot.
Change-Id: I3875a7b4a4ba3c1aa8a3c1507b3993036a7155fc
Signed-off-by: Shelley Chen <shchen@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46855
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Having folders for bootblock and romstage is no longer necessary.
Change-Id: I7d1f4063de6a1a1ff9ee7478e94f889a50102054
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46795
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|