Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Shorten define names containing PCI_{DEVICE,VENDOR}_ID_ with
PCI_{DID,VID}_ using the commands below, which also take care of some
spacing issues. An additional clean up of pci_ids.h is done in
CB:61531.
Used commands:
* find -type f -exec sed -i 's/PCI_\([DV]\)\(EVICE\|ENDOR\)_ID_\([_0-9A-Za-z]\{2\}\([_0-9A-Za-z]\{8\}\)*[_0-9A-Za-z]\{0,5\}\)\t/PCI_\1ID_\3\t\t/g'
* find -type f -exec sed -i 's/PCI_\([DV]\)\(EVICE\|ENDOR\)_ID_\([_0-9A-Za-z]*\)/PCI_\1ID_\3/g'
Change-Id: If9027700f53b6d0d3964c26a41a1f9b8f62be178
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39331
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
|
|
The `find_resource` function will never return null (will die instead).
In cases where the existing code already accounts for null pointers, it
is better to use `probe_resource` instead, which returns a null pointer
instead of dying.
Change-Id: I2a57ea1c2f5b156afd0724829e5b1880246f351f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58907
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
|
|
This file only contains the `broadwell_run_reference_code()` function
prototype (either a declaration or an inline stub definition). Rename
this file to refcode.h and only include it where necessary.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Purism Librem 13 v1 remains identical.
Change-Id: I6513f45b8914a84312b27ef4860870a89fd0aab3
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55582
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The typedef needlessly hides the actual type of the variables.
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Purism Librem 13 v1 remains identical.
Change-Id: I58a58cd402ec679960f460e80b37ff2afb8e3974
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55492
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Tested with BUILD_TIMELESS=1, Asrock B85M Pro4 and Purism Librem 13 v1
remain identical.
Change-Id: I74b633fb0b012304b5b4bd943272ed82dcb6f7d5
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52468
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
It was commented that the need for the delay was mainly related
to external displays and only with VBIOS execution. Move the
delay such that it is done only when we actually need to execute
the VBIOS aka option rom.
A delay is currently only defined for librem/purism_bdw in
its Kconfig. As the description of the issue sounds like it
would equally happen on other platforms when VBIOS is involved,
promote the Kconfig visible option to global scope.
Change-Id: I4503158576f35057373f003586bbf76af4d59b3d
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48787
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: Ie3feee0448175db2b6ed4e8e37d92de3af9be371
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50252
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Otherwise, the `GT_CDCLK_675` case falls through and exits early.
Change-Id: Icb979f8a980e1a1e1c712c5d9bc8d94c90376b7f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50141
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
Now that the boards use Haswell's CPU code, Broadwell can be updated.
Change-Id: If07e5272f07edb59bb18eef1f80d7d5807b26e66
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46949
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
There are multiple different devicetree setting formats for graphics
panel settings present in coreboot. Replace the ones for the platforms
that already have (mostly) unified gma/graphics setup code by a unified
struct in the gma driver. Hook it up in HSW, BDW, SKL, and APL and adapt
the devicetrees accordingly.
Always ensure that values don't overflow by applying appropriate masks.
The remaining platforms implementing panel settings (GM45, i945, ILK and
SNB) can be migrated later after unifying their gma/graphics setup code.
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Change-Id: I445defe01d5fbf9a69cf05cf1b5bd6c7c2c1725e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48885
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
For easier review of the switch to a new register struct in the
follow-up change, the panel delay times get converted from destination
register raw format to milliseconds representation in this change.
Formula for conversion of power cycle delay:
gpu_panel_power_cycle_delay_ms =
(gpu_panel_power_cycle_delay - 1) * 100
Formula for all others:
gpu_panel_power_X_delay_ms = gpu_panel_power_X_delay / 10
The register names gain a suffix `_ms` and calculation of the
destination register raw values gets done in gma code now.
Change-Id: Idf8e076dac2b3048a63a0109263a6e7899f07230
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48958
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Correct the mask for the power cycle delay from 0xff to 0x1f, to
represent the actual maximum value according to Intel graphics PRM for
Haswell, Volume 2c and Intel graphics PRM for Broadwell, Volume 2c.
Change-Id: Ib187f1ca6474325475e5ae4cc1b2ffbce12f10bf
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/48957
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ifd1fb02497e1d326b6b9c5752f471f52b145a8ef
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46732
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
It is only used in a single file, on two functions that already check
whether coreboot is running on a Haswell or a Broadwell processor.
Change-Id: I86e1061f722e6d6855190c2fd863d85fc24a1ee0
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46708
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This is essentially a duplicate of `pci_dev_ops_pci`.
Change-Id: I06a21ebd759c35910cd753d3079ea7902868e89d
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46697
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Rename it, add a print and factor out refclock value into a variable.
Change-Id: I7248e0b54cd6310cf74eadc5d976a8868cf822f2
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46688
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This makes comparisons against Haswell a bit simpler.
Change-Id: If1c937628f702c6765a5f36b6eaf4a3c3516359a
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/46323
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
|