| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Found-by: ACPICA 20191018
Change-Id: I81286d89da933b503f605737f28772bfb08483a3
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36253
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The ACPI code of LPE device is included regardless of the
availability of the LPE controller.
Linux remains requesting the status of device LPEA even if
this device is disabled.
Include ACPI LPE controller code at Braswell mainboards with
LPE enabled.
BUG=N/A
TEST=Linux 4.17+ on Portwell PQ7-M107
Change-Id: Ic8acf9ea9e9b0ba9b272e20beb2023b7a4716a73
Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/29414
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com>
|
|
The LPEA device memory resources, required by Windows drivers,
were not being set. Allocate required resources per Inte'sl CHT
Tianocore reference code.
Test: boot Windows on google/edgar, observe LPEA device working properly.
Change-Id: Ic3ecfc2ddade7d76dbaa95ffdd82599c3bcf35da
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/24987
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Without PMAX correctly set, the calculation for PLEN is incorrect,
leading to a Windows BSOD on boot. Correct PMAX using code from
Baytrail SoC, setting PMAX to (CONFIG_MMCONF_BASE_ADDRESS - 1).
Test: Boot Windows 10 on google/edgar without BSOD.
Change-Id: I4f2f4a0ff3a285826709f9eaafa40b0bf0cafb83
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/24985
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
For an unknown reason, the I2C ACPI devices were placed
under \SB intead of \SB.PCI0, as with all other non-Atom
based Intel platforms. While Linux is tolerant of this,
Windows is not. Correct by moving I2C ACPI devices where
they belong.
Also, adjust I2C devices at board level for intel/strago
and google/cyan as to not break compilation.
Change-Id: Iaf8211bd86d6261ee8c4d9c4262338f7fe19ef43
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20055
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Add the files to support the Braswell SOC.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=Build for a Braswell platform
Change-Id: I968da68733e57647d0a08e4040ff0378b4d59004
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10051
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Follow up for commit b890a12, some contributions brought
back a number of FSF addresses, so get rid of them again.
Change-Id: I0ac0c957738ce512deb0ed82b2219ef90d96d46b
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10322
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Add baytrail source for comparison with Braswell.
BRANCH=none
BUG=None
TEST=None
Change-Id: I5170addf41676d95a3daf070a32bcee085f8156d
Signed-off-by: Lee Leahy <leroy.p.leahy@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10117
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
