Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The SMI on TCO timer timeout policy was copied from other
chipsets. However, it's not very advantageous to have
the TCO timer timeout trigger an SMI unless the firmware
was the one responsible for setting up the timer.
BUG=chromium:321832
BRANCH=rambi,squawks
TEST=Manually enabled TCO timer. TCO fires and logged in
eventlog.
Change-Id: I420b14d6aa778335a925784a64160fa885cba20f
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/181985
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5035
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
The PMC in baytrail maintains an additional set
wake status in memory-mapped registers. If these
bits aren't cleared the device won't be able to
go to S5 or S3 without being immediately woken up.
Therefore clear these registers.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:24913
BRANCH=rambi,squawks
TEST=Ensured PRSTS bit 4 is cleared after a reboot and S3 and S5 work
correctly.
Change-Id: I356e00ece851961135b4760cebcdd34e8b9da027
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/181984
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5034
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
The PCIe subsystem was constantly waking up boards from
S3 and S5. Completely disable PCIe wake ups. It can be made
mainboard-configurable later if needed.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:24004
BRANCH=None
TEST=Both S3 and EC RW->RW update (trip through S5) don't
cause wakeups.
Change-Id: I922e2947c4b6e29277d913f06192601a2954f8fe
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/176791
Reviewed-by: Shawn Nematbakhsh <shawnn@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4972
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
GPIOs which trigger SMIs only set the status bits in the ALT_GPIO_SMI
regier. No bits in the SMI_STS register are set. Therefore, the
ALT_GPIO_SMI register needs to be read and cleared on every SMI.
Additionally, the mainboard_gpi_smi() handler needs to be called as
well on every SMI because of this property.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:23505
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted to recovery screen. Typed 'lidclose' on EC
console. SMI occurred which caused the board to be shutdown.
Change-Id: Ic204d8b928a0cb4f51f108a649f374d9f94e4f47
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/176391
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4958
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
In order for gpio pins to trigger an smi/sci the GPIO_ROUT
register needs to be set accordingly. For SMI, the ALT_GPIO_SMI
register needs to be enabled for each gpio as well.
The first 8 gpios from the suspend and core well are the only gpios
that can trigger an SMI or SCI. The settings for the GPIO_ROUT
and ALT_GPIO_SMI register are not commited until the SMM settings
are enabled in the southcluster.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:23505
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted. Manually triggered SCI by changing GPE0a_EN
and toggling PCH_WAKE_L on the EC console.
Change-Id: Id79b70084edc39fc047475e984494c224bd75d6d
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/176390
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4957
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Initialize SMM on all CPUs by relocating the SMM region
and setting SMRR on all the cores. Additionally SMI
is enabled in the south cluster.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:22862
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted rambi. Tested with DEBUG_SMI and noted
power button turns off board while in firmware.
Change-Id: I92e3460572feeb67d4a3d4d26af5f0ecaf7d3dd5
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/173983
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4892
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|