Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
and add pci ids for GLK and APL from device/pci_ids.h
Change-Id: If8101fe52591b09caadfe104ca8daab4258837c7
Signed-off-by: Hannah Williams <hannah.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19999
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
This patch to make common PCI device name between APL and SKL.
Change-Id: I5e4c7502e9678c0a367e9c7a96cf848d5b24f68e
Signed-off-by: Barnali Sarkar <barnali.sarkar@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18576
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
The P2SB device is device 0xd and function 0. If hidden that
causes the latter pci devices on function >= 1 to not be probed
in the kernel. This is also a problem for coreboot if the P2SB
device is hidden by FSP. That means the coreboot driver won't
be ran. Therefore, provide hide and unhide functions for the
P2SB device.
The other quirk is to allow the GPIO devices to work correctly.
Those devices are ACPI devices. However, their resources are
sub-regions within the P2SB BAR. Sadly, linux doesn't handle
ACPI devices being children of PCI devices. This leads to resource
conflict errors when the P2SB device is visible. For the
time being keep the P2SB device hidden, but also ensure the
resources it is using are accounted for and reserved. The fallout
of that is the PMC and SPI device are no longer probed by the
kernel.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:53017
TEST=Ensured P2SB device is visible and pci resources are allocated
correctly for the devices.
Change-Id: I24e59bbde74310e1ce8425b344a3ad0b88702153
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15530
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Andrey Petrov <andrey.petrov@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|