coreboot.git - my copy of coreboot

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2014-05-29	fsp_baytrail: Add the FSP version of Intel's Bay Trail-I chip	Martin Roth
	While similar to the Bay Trail-M/D code based on the MRC, there are many differences as well: - Obviously, uses the FSP instead of the MRC binaries. - FSP does additional hardware setup, so coreboot doesn't need to. - Different microcode & microcode loading method - Uses the cache_as_ram.inc from the FSP Driver - Various other changes in support of the FSP Additional changes that don't have to to with the FSP vs MRC: - Updated IRQ Routing - Different FADT implementation. This was validated with FSP: BAYTRAIL_FSP_GOLD_002_10-JANUARY-2014.fd SHA256: d29eefbb33454bd5314bfaa38fb055d592a757de7b348ed7096cd8c2d65908a5 MD5: 9360cd915f0d3e4116bbc782233d7b91 Change-Id: Iadadf8cd6cf444ba840e0f76d3aed7825cd7aee4 Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@se-eng.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5791 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-01-31	baytrail: add initial support	Aaron Durbin
	The initial Bay Trail code is intended to support the mobile and desktop version of Bay Trail. This support can train memory and execute through ramstage. However, the resource allocation is not curently handled correctly. The MRC cache parameters are successfully saved and reused after the initial cold boot. BUG=chrome-os-partner:22292 BRANCH=None TEST=Built and booted on a reference board through ramstage. Change-Id: I238ede326802aad272c6cca39d7ad4f161d813f5 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/168387 Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4847 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>