| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Currently, the MMCONF Kconfigs only support the Enhanced Configuration
Access mechanism (ECAM) method for accessing the PCI config address
space. Some platforms have a different way of mapping the PCI config
space to memory. This patch renames the following configs to
make it clear that these configs are ECAM-specific:
- NO_MMCONF_SUPPORT --> NO_ECAM_MMCONF_SUPPORT
- MMCONF_SUPPORT --> ECAM_MMCONF_SUPPORT
- MMCONF_BASE_ADDRESS --> ECAM_MMCONF_BASE_ADDRESS
- MMCONF_BUS_NUMBER --> ECAM_MMCONF_BUS_NUMBER
- MMCONF_LENGTH --> ECAM_MMCONF_LENGTH
Please refer to CB:57861 "Proposed coreboot Changes" for more
details.
BUG=b:181098581
BRANCH=None
TEST=./util/abuild/abuild -p none -t GOOGLE_KOHAKU -x -a -c max
Make sure Jenkins verifies that builds on other boards
Change-Id: I1e196a1ed52d131a71f00cba1d93a23e54aca3e2
Signed-off-by: Shelley Chen <shchen@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/57333
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
|
|
Since all multi-core x86 CPUs need to have LAPICs, this option should be
selected for soc/example/min86.
TEST=The example/min86 mainboard still builds.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I5aa6e850f0b4dca27309385ba889b04335fe4f0c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58549
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
With using a Kconfig option to add the x86 LAPIC support code to the
build, there's no need for adding the corresponding directory to subdirs
in the CPU/SoC Makefile. Comparing which CPU/SoC Makefiles added
(cpu/)x86/mtrr and (cpu/)x86/lapic before this and the corresponding
MTRR code selection patch and having verified that all platforms
added the MTRR code on that patch shows that soc/example/min86 and
soc/intel/quark are the only platforms that don't end up selecting the
LAPIC code. So for now the default value of CPU_X86_LAPIC is chosen as y
which gets overridden to n in the Kconfig of the two SoCs mentioned
above.
Change-Id: I6f683ea7ba92c91117017ebc6ad063ec54902b0a
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/44228
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Introduce the `ARCH_ALL_STAGES_X86` Kconfig symbol to automatically
select the per-stage arch options. Subsequent commits will leverage
this to allow choosing between 32-bit and 64-bit coreboot where all
stages are x86. AMD Picasso and AMD Cezanne are the only exceptions
to this rule: they disable `ARCH_ALL_STAGES_X86` and explicitly set
the per-stage arch options accordingly.
Change-Id: Ia2ddbae8c0dfb5301352d725032f6ebd370428c9
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55759
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
To generalise the choice of 32-bit or 64-bit coreboot on x86 hardware,
have platforms select `ARCH_X86` directly instead of through per-stage
Kconfig options, effectively reversing the dependency order.
Change-Id: If15436817ba664398055e9efc6c7c656de3bf3e4
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55758
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
The min86 example SoC code along with the example mainboard
should serve as a minimal example how a buildable x86 SoC code
base can look like.
This can serve, for instance, as a basis to add new SoCs to
coreboot. Starting with a buildable commit should help with
the review of the actual code, and also avoid any regressions
when common coreboot code changes.
As the example code itself is build-tested, it should advance
with coreboot and can't rot like documentation might. It also
serves as a check what APIs need to be implemented with the
default Kconfig settings.
Change-Id: Id76ab15fe77ae3e405c43f9c8677694f178be112
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45710
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
