summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/soc/amd/stoneyridge/i2c.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2019-03-12src: Drop unused 'include <arch/acpigen.h>'Elyes HAOUAS
Use <arch/acpi.h> when appropriate. Change-Id: I05a28d2c15565c21407101e611ee1984c5411ff0 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31781 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
2019-01-06device: Use pcidev_path_on_root()Kyösti Mälkki
Change-Id: I2e28b9f4ecaf258bff8a062b5a54cb3d8e2bb9b0 Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30400 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
2018-02-06soc/amd/stoneyridge: Add API to initialize non-early_init i2c busesDaniel Kurtz
Provide a method for initializing i2c buses that are not marked as early_init in the device tree. These i2c buses can be enabled in a mainboard's ramstage, for example. BUG=b:69407112 TEST=Boot depthcharge w/ CLI enabled on grunt. devbeep => plays beep BRANCH=None Change-Id: I6e49b0de9116138ba102377d283e22d7b50d7dca Signed-off-by: Daniel Kurtz <djkurtz@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23553 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2018-01-30soc/amd/stoneyridge: initialize i2c buses marked as early initAaron Durbin
Initialize the i2c buses that are marked as early init in the device tree. BUG=b:70232394,b:69250772 Change-Id: Iced1797f3bb4765646736c423b081cdc33c12a48 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23497 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Justin TerAvest <teravest@chromium.org>
2018-01-26soc/amd/stoneyridge: fix compilation errorAaron Durbin
The following two patches were independent, but they were merged together. However, the first one changed the API that the second was originally was written against. Fix build. b94a2750 (i2c/designware: reduce API complication for bus config) 13101a7b (soc/amd/stoneyridge: Add I2C devicetree support) BUG=b:72121803 Change-Id: I3678a8f414572dd2227c42ce5585daf6bc933df5 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23445 Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2018-01-25soc/amd/stoneyridge: Add I2C devicetree support.Justin TerAvest
This commit establishes the stoneyridge implementation for i2c entries in the devicetree.cb file. BUG=b:72121803 Change-Id: I0d923609bd8fce94c9aee401a5ae2811281b60e5 Signed-off-by: Justin TerAvest <teravest@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23405 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2018-01-08soc/amd/stoneyridge/i2c: fix formatting and global symbolAaron Durbin
The i2c_bus_address array doesn't need to be a global symbol. Also, the array initializer had some weird indention and there was an extra new line. For consistency the first entry is multiplied by 0 so the formatting is similar. BUG=b:69416132 Change-Id: I74f6dca3a22a245759536f792ce04ac61735b6d0 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23170 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Justin TerAvest <teravest@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Chris Ching <chingcodes@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
2018-01-03soc/amd/stoneyridge: Add I2C supportChris Ching
BUG=b:69416132 BRANCH=none TEST=make Change-Id: Id940af917c9525aba7bc25eea0821f5f36a36653 Signed-off-by: Chris Ching <chingcodes@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/22959 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>