Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Change-Id: Ie9dbed7d6dd1e5f0c97d4a6cedea3d6bd7b000a2
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <fishbaozi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/62068
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Nikolai Vyssotski <nikolai.vyssotski@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
|
|
Add the information of substance and instance in the string for PMUI
and PMUD. It is amdfwtool's job to extract the number from the string.
Change-Id: I43235fefcbff5f730efaf0a8e70b906e62cee42e
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <fishbaozi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/62066
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
This patch renames all FSP Notify Phase API configs to primarily remove
"SKIP_" prefix.
1. SKIP_FSP_NOTIFY_PHASE_AFTER_PCI_ENUM ->
USE_FSP_NOTIFY_PHASE_POST_PCI_ENUM
2. SKIP_FSP_NOTIFY_PHASE_READY_TO_BOOT ->
USE_FSP_NOTIFY_PHASE_READY_TO_BOOT
3. SKIP_FSP_NOTIFY_PHASE_END_OF_FIRMWARE ->
USE_FSP_NOTIFY_PHASE_END_OF_FIRMWARE
The idea here is to let SoC selects all required FSP configs to execute
FSP Notify Phase APIs unless SoC deselects those configs to run native
coreboot implementation as part of the `.final` ops.
For now all SoC that uses FSP APIs have selected all required configs
to let FSP to execute Notify Phase APIs.
Note: coreboot native implementation to skip FSP notify phase API (post
pci enumeration) is still WIP.
Additionally, fixed SoC configs inclusion order alphabetically.
BUG=b:211954778
TEST=Able to build and boot brya.
Signed-off-by: Subrata Banik <subratabanik@google.com>
Change-Id: Ib95368872acfa3c49dad4eb7d0d73fca04b4a1fb
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61792
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Lean Sheng Tan <sheng.tan@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Spaces before tabs are not allowed.
Change-Id: I0d2c55c2e0108e59facd92b2e2c0f6c418ef6db0
Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/62055
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Select ACP gen2 for Sabrina
Change-Id: I107ebd390732b597629a3236d0e7d1f5e2c51379
Signed-off-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61833
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Refactor existing acp code into acp_gen1 variant as preparation for gen2
variant in sabrina.
Change-Id: Id9248584237196b5404b79d3a8552cb90fe4491e
Signed-off-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61831
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
makefile variables
Currently apu/amdfw_a-position and apu/amdfw_b-position currently depend on CEZANNE_FW_A_POSITION and CEZANNE_FW_B_POSITION. This causes error messages from awk as these variables are sourced from fmap_config.h and these variables are expanded before fmap_config.h is built. However these variables should not be set to CEZANNE_FW_*_POSITION. These files end up in the FW_MAIN_* fmap regions. These regions are placed at the proper locations through the chromeos.fmd file. The apu/amdfw_*-position variables are the positions within these regions where the files end up. These variables should be set to 0x40 to coincide with the beginning of the FW_MAIN_* regions, accounting for the size of struct cbfs_file + filename + metadata, aligned to 64 bytes. Currently they end up in the correct locations only because fmap_config.h does not exist when the apu/amdfw_*-position variables are expanded.
This change explicity sets the value of these variables to 0x40, removing the errors from awk and ensuring that these files end up in the correct location in the resulting image. These changes are also applied to the Picasso and Sabrina makefiles as well.
BUG=b:198322933
TEST=Verified that the apu/amdfw_* files end up in the correct locations as reported by cbfstool during the build, did timeless builds and confirmed that coreboot.rom images were identical, tested AP firmware on guybrush and zork devices
Signed-off-by: Robert Zieba <robertzieba@google.com>
Change-Id: If1c2b61c5be0bcab52e19349dacbcc391e8aa909
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61349
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Rob Barnes <robbarnes@google.com>
|
|
Sabrina uses the same MMIO_CONF_BASE MSR as the previous AMD CPUs to
configure the PCI MMCONF base address.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I7e3064bab5ca1e277b04f9aae98f9adabce75399
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61681
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The Sabrina PSP doesn't support mapping the UART, so add a dummy
function to return NULL.
BUG=b:215599230
TEST=None
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Idad8e4874e78bb96730feecb5a7b17334d12217c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61609
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
|
|
Sabrina is compatible with the common AMD UART block and also with the
DRIVERS_UART_8250MEM_32 driver it selects.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I432414c1d501ffbd1047b378996e06d281a9fb6f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61641
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
|
|
Sabrina is compatible with the common AMD SOC_AMD_COMMON_BLOCK_IOMMU
code.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I4c2e8553fde9467ca1b5e9085e36c33d138b7156
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61633
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Sabrina is compatible with the common AMD ACPIMMIO function block
mapping and access functions.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I890375654a9cb1156e481c5586007ac81ab84120
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61626
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Implementation for setup_lapic() did two things -- call
enable_lapic() and virtual_wire_mode_init().
In PARALLEL_MP case enable_lapic() was redundant as it
was already executed prior to initialize_cpu() call.
For the !PARALLEL_MP case enable_lapic() is added to
AP CPUs.
Change-Id: I5caf94315776a499e9cf8f007251b61f51292dc5
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58387
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Sabrina has no SATA controller, so remove the corresponding PIRQ
mapping. This was verified with PPR #57243 Rev 1.53.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I98ffa3675c361e8a74c50ebfc37e79ae63dacc85
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61601
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The common AMD data fabric register access code is valid for Sabrina.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I97fb2c6006c09297584845a83342e75058d35713
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61600
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The common AMD SMU code and the common AMD SMN access code that gets
selected by the common SMU code are valid for Sabrina.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ic220dbb2f73b89554ac7e7b7e6dc7525ae8e9faa
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61599
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The common AMD FCH AOAC bit definitions and helper functions are correct
for Sabrina.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ie791cca0dc760e53e0f5c69c63ac78270ba6ad4f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61598
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Sabrina uses an identical I2C controller as Picasso and Cezanne. Also
both the type and version read-only register of the I2C controller
contain identical values.
The dma_cr, dma_tdlr, dma_rdlr and clr_restart_det registers that are
defined in the dw_i2c_regs struct in the common Designware I2C code
aren't defined in the PPRs of Picasso, Cezanne and Sabrina, but since
common DW I2C code doesn't access those, this is no problem.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I90732aa98518010686f73f80bee229b13e9bc89c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61592
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
I2C bus 0..2 on Sabrina uses a different pad type which supports 1.1V
and 1.8V levels, but doesn't support 3.3V I2C levels. Compared to the
existing I2C pad control registers the bit definitions are different, so
add a separate function to configure those pads which however still has
the same function signature and is compatible with same data structs
used for the devicetree settings. PPR #57243 Rev 1.50 was used as a
reference.
TEST=None
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ie210c3437f2608d1e9fb99dcb151fc4190721375
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61570
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The I2C pad control registers of Picasso and Cezanne are identical and
the one of Sabrina is a superset of it, so factor out the functionality.
To avoid having devicetree settings that contain raw register bits, the
i2c_pad_control struct is introduced and used. The old Picasso code for
this had the RX level hard-coded for 3.3V I2C interfaces, so keep it
this way in this patch but add a TODO for future improvements.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I1d70329644b68be3c4a1602f748e09db20cf6de1
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61568
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I9d098a55a5c6f6e022c3896750c752e2759e101b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61567
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
No mainboard in the current tree implements mainboard_i2c_override. In a
follow-up commit the i2c_pad_control struct is introduced to be able to
make more parameters controllable by devicetree settings in the future.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I8f9ed5d50d26e4623dc5888cc8af090fdd00fc03
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61566
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Commit 86302a806c5cc9b575424305e761753710417692 (soc/amd/{common,
cezanne,picasso}: Add PRE_X86_CBMEM_CONSOLE_SIZE) added this Kconfig
option before the initial commit that added soc/amd/sabrina as copy of
soc/amd/cezanne landed in the tree, so port the change forward to
Sabrina.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I2e8df5e7b7f1ac0af772e8c565f616a68b28e29e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61358
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The corresponding mainboard design guide was used as a reference here.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ie61af7dab35b560d2eec1ea62058f3a4dad5cb0f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61094
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The SMU message response register was moved compared to Cezanne.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ie384de52b1efb1d52f9018315a4b72916a4c9cee
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61095
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Iac1b7308851c34bd1556c02af6b270e9346073e4
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61098
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The Sabrina SoC doesn't have the PM_ESPI_CS_USE_DATA2 bit defined in the
PM_SPI_PAD_PU_PD register. It also doesn't have a physical LPC interface
any more, so there are no LPC pins that can be reconfigured as eSPI
interface.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I02bc8d007901c71942475fe707637c5da7227230
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61097
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The CPPC feature isn't available on the Sabrina SoC, so drop the
corresponding code.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I71a1b0717571729ebca3600ac433e621cafc4e61
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61096
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Also update mb/amd/chausie accordingly.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Idb4dcffa48c3dbdcffb66f1398b99ee96562efb9
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61093
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ic0226afd9e7fffd6bf196f06ee6c34b6b9c92f30
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61092
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
There are no SATA controllers on the Sabrina SoC. The UPD field will be
removed later as a part of the initial UPD header update.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Iedefd9f150e5bcb78173288e5fc9f1bbd6b498cd
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61091
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
|
|
Some of the names have slightly changed in the PPR, but I kept the
current names for consistency across all AMD SoCs in coreboot. Revision
1.50 of the PPR #57243 was used as a reference.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I6bda656015858a57e221b8d7819f944c21564a39
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61090
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The data fabric ID table in PPR #57243 Rev 1.50 has a different IOMS0
fabric ID than Cezanne.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I32890b5c03219f6ebf8180929d71ef726d382483
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61089
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
|
|
Since we don't need to support PCI ID remapping for finding the correct
VBIOS binary for the integrated GPU, graphics.c can be dropped for now.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ifd5b678f472b3b5888353efd057203eb641be874
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61088
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Sabrina is family 17h model A0h.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I01e02e3491fb90941c767058986da876bdf7ca1d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61087
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Compared to Cezanne there are 3 more UART controllers. Revision 1.50 of
the PPR #57243 was used as a reference.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I628b1a7a0930f3409acdcabda2b864d42bf6bd23
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61086
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
|
|
The GPIO and GPIO MUX mapping as well as some GPIO to GEVENT mappings
have changed compared to Cezanne. Sabrina also doesn't have a remote
GPIO bank. Revision 1.50 of PPR #57243 was used as a reference.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Iabb85a3d24c881055e94400d08d01505df44a07a
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61084
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
|
|
Compared to Cezanne there are 3 more UARTs controllers. The PCI
interrupt index table in the new SoC's PPR #57243 Rev 1.50 doesn't
contain a PIRQ mapping for UART4. The reference code has a mapping for
this and it uses PIRQ mapping index 0x77 for UART4 and not for I2C5.
Since the I2C5 controller isn't owned by the x86 side and I didn't see
any mapping of the I2C5 controller into the x86 MMIO space, this seems
very plausible. Also add the corresponding fields to the ACPI code.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I44780f5bc20966e6cc9867fca609d67f2893163d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61083
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I7fa1f9402b177a036f08bf99c98a6191c35fa0b5
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61371
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
This code is common to at least all Zen-based APUs (Picasso, Cezanne,
Sabrina) and is also useful outside of the SoC-specific dynamic ACPI
table generation code.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ie96d4429fb6ed9223efed9b3c754e04052d7ca7c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61357
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Rob Barnes <robbarnes@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Chris Wang <chris.wang@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Eric Peers <epeers@google.com>
|
|
Compared to Cezanne there are 3 more UARTs controllers.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Id98767197a21cb1a61f54fc9b256b10a9506c791
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61082
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Compared to Cezanne there are 3 more UARTs with DMA controllers.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I3a3d255bb4976a55623f3a161e791e80f1d01c69
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61081
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Replace the Renoir/Cezanne PCI IDs with the Sabrina ones that were added
in commit 27b02c2eee68f4b6c8520c4737224aaaf81f137d (include/device/
pci_ids.h: add PCI IDs for AMD Family 17h Model A0h SoC).
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I427df6f8e8c08fb47ae8513b6cf1085d4294e28f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61080
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The Cezanne SoC code was initially started as a copy of example/min86
which only provides enough code to make the SoC code build. Then the
different parts of the real SoC support was brought in patch by patch
which also helped cleaning up and untangling the code. Since the Cezanne
SoC code is now in a rather good shape and the Sabrina SoC is similar to
the Cezanne SoC from the coreboot side, the new SoC support is started
with a copy of the Cezanne code and all the needed changes will be
applied on top of that. In order for the build not to fail due to
duplicate files, this patch does not only copy the directory, but also
replaces most instances of the Cezanne name with Sabrina. Since the
needed blobs aren't available in the 3rdparty/amd_blobs repository yet,
the Cezanne blobs are used for now so that the build will succeed. As
soon as the proper blobs will be available in that repository, the code
will be switched over to use them.
As suggested by Nico, I added a "TODO: Check if this is still correct"
comment to the beginning of every copied file and all SOC_AMD_COMMON_*
Kconfig option selects which will be removed after re-verifying that
each file and each selected common code block is still correct for the
new SoC.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I978ddbdbfd70863acac17d98732936ec2be8fe3c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61077
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|