| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Contradicting the PPR #57243 version 1.56, the I2C3 pad control register
in the MISC ACPIMMIO region is the same new I23C pad type as the
corresponding registers for I2C0..2 and not the older I2C pad control
register type used on Picasso and Cezanne. All I2C pads being of the new
I23C type is in line with the GPIOMUX settings for the pins used by
I2C0..3 that can alternatively connect the pins to an I3C controller.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I51b0ddf8ba2ccfee823e3d4d26a77b11825b1029
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/63233
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The SoC-specific I2C code and header file have been verified some time
ago, but it seems that I forgot to remove the corresponding TODOs.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ifd162bda10e5993bc32db3a77588491397e3c19e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/62223
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
I2C bus 0..2 on Sabrina uses a different pad type which supports 1.1V
and 1.8V levels, but doesn't support 3.3V I2C levels. Compared to the
existing I2C pad control registers the bit definitions are different, so
add a separate function to configure those pads which however still has
the same function signature and is compatible with same data structs
used for the devicetree settings. PPR #57243 Rev 1.50 was used as a
reference.
TEST=None
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ie210c3437f2608d1e9fb99dcb151fc4190721375
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61570
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The I2C pad control registers of Picasso and Cezanne are identical and
the one of Sabrina is a superset of it, so factor out the functionality.
To avoid having devicetree settings that contain raw register bits, the
i2c_pad_control struct is introduced and used. The old Picasso code for
this had the RX level hard-coded for 3.3V I2C interfaces, so keep it
this way in this patch but add a TODO for future improvements.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I1d70329644b68be3c4a1602f748e09db20cf6de1
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61568
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I9d098a55a5c6f6e022c3896750c752e2759e101b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61567
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
No mainboard in the current tree implements mainboard_i2c_override. In a
follow-up commit the i2c_pad_control struct is introduced to be able to
make more parameters controllable by devicetree settings in the future.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I8f9ed5d50d26e4623dc5888cc8af090fdd00fc03
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61566
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The Cezanne SoC code was initially started as a copy of example/min86
which only provides enough code to make the SoC code build. Then the
different parts of the real SoC support was brought in patch by patch
which also helped cleaning up and untangling the code. Since the Cezanne
SoC code is now in a rather good shape and the Sabrina SoC is similar to
the Cezanne SoC from the coreboot side, the new SoC support is started
with a copy of the Cezanne code and all the needed changes will be
applied on top of that. In order for the build not to fail due to
duplicate files, this patch does not only copy the directory, but also
replaces most instances of the Cezanne name with Sabrina. Since the
needed blobs aren't available in the 3rdparty/amd_blobs repository yet,
the Cezanne blobs are used for now so that the build will succeed. As
soon as the proper blobs will be available in that repository, the code
will be switched over to use them.
As suggested by Nico, I added a "TODO: Check if this is still correct"
comment to the beginning of every copied file and all SOC_AMD_COMMON_*
Kconfig option selects which will be removed after re-verifying that
each file and each selected common code block is still correct for the
new SoC.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I978ddbdbfd70863acac17d98732936ec2be8fe3c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61077
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
