Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Commit 3e1943ec46d04aff01c7fc755ac371e33e7a2dcb (soc/amd/cezanne: Force
resets to be cold) forced all resets on Cezanne to be cold resets to
work around a bug. Since the bug is fixed on Sabrina, this workaround
copied over from the Cezanne code isn't needed here, so sort-of revert
what the patch referenced above changed for Cezanne in the Sabrina code.
BUG=b:229105416
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I785e43124a9a969eeb129454e6e15dc245625250
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/63741
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
|
|
Sabrina has no SATA controller, so remove the corresponding PIRQ
mapping. This was verified with PPR #57243 Rev 1.53.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I98ffa3675c361e8a74c50ebfc37e79ae63dacc85
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61601
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Compared to Cezanne there are 3 more UARTs controllers. The PCI
interrupt index table in the new SoC's PPR #57243 Rev 1.50 doesn't
contain a PIRQ mapping for UART4. The reference code has a mapping for
this and it uses PIRQ mapping index 0x77 for UART4 and not for I2C5.
Since the I2C5 controller isn't owned by the x86 side and I didn't see
any mapping of the I2C5 controller into the x86 MMIO space, this seems
very plausible. Also add the corresponding fields to the ACPI code.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I44780f5bc20966e6cc9867fca609d67f2893163d
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61083
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
The Cezanne SoC code was initially started as a copy of example/min86
which only provides enough code to make the SoC code build. Then the
different parts of the real SoC support was brought in patch by patch
which also helped cleaning up and untangling the code. Since the Cezanne
SoC code is now in a rather good shape and the Sabrina SoC is similar to
the Cezanne SoC from the coreboot side, the new SoC support is started
with a copy of the Cezanne code and all the needed changes will be
applied on top of that. In order for the build not to fail due to
duplicate files, this patch does not only copy the directory, but also
replaces most instances of the Cezanne name with Sabrina. Since the
needed blobs aren't available in the 3rdparty/amd_blobs repository yet,
the Cezanne blobs are used for now so that the build will succeed. As
soon as the proper blobs will be available in that repository, the code
will be switched over to use them.
As suggested by Nico, I added a "TODO: Check if this is still correct"
comment to the beginning of every copied file and all SOC_AMD_COMMON_*
Kconfig option selects which will be removed after re-verifying that
each file and each selected common code block is still correct for the
new SoC.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I978ddbdbfd70863acac17d98732936ec2be8fe3c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61077
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|