| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Sabrina is compatible with the common AMD SOC_AMD_COMMON_BLOCK_IOMMU
code.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I4c2e8553fde9467ca1b5e9085e36c33d138b7156
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61633
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Sabrina is compatible with the common AMD ACPIMMIO function block
mapping and access functions.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I890375654a9cb1156e481c5586007ac81ab84120
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61626
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The common AMD data fabric register access code is valid for Sabrina.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I97fb2c6006c09297584845a83342e75058d35713
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61600
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The common AMD SMU code and the common AMD SMN access code that gets
selected by the common SMU code are valid for Sabrina.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ic220dbb2f73b89554ac7e7b7e6dc7525ae8e9faa
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61599
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The common AMD FCH AOAC bit definitions and helper functions are correct
for Sabrina.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ie791cca0dc760e53e0f5c69c63ac78270ba6ad4f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61598
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Sabrina uses an identical I2C controller as Picasso and Cezanne. Also
both the type and version read-only register of the I2C controller
contain identical values.
The dma_cr, dma_tdlr, dma_rdlr and clr_restart_det registers that are
defined in the dw_i2c_regs struct in the common Designware I2C code
aren't defined in the PPRs of Picasso, Cezanne and Sabrina, but since
common DW I2C code doesn't access those, this is no problem.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I90732aa98518010686f73f80bee229b13e9bc89c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61592
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
I2C bus 0..2 on Sabrina uses a different pad type which supports 1.1V
and 1.8V levels, but doesn't support 3.3V I2C levels. Compared to the
existing I2C pad control registers the bit definitions are different, so
add a separate function to configure those pads which however still has
the same function signature and is compatible with same data structs
used for the devicetree settings. PPR #57243 Rev 1.50 was used as a
reference.
TEST=None
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ie210c3437f2608d1e9fb99dcb151fc4190721375
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61570
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The I2C pad control registers of Picasso and Cezanne are identical and
the one of Sabrina is a superset of it, so factor out the functionality.
To avoid having devicetree settings that contain raw register bits, the
i2c_pad_control struct is introduced and used. The old Picasso code for
this had the RX level hard-coded for 3.3V I2C interfaces, so keep it
this way in this patch but add a TODO for future improvements.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I1d70329644b68be3c4a1602f748e09db20cf6de1
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61568
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Commit 86302a806c5cc9b575424305e761753710417692 (soc/amd/{common,
cezanne,picasso}: Add PRE_X86_CBMEM_CONSOLE_SIZE) added this Kconfig
option before the initial commit that added soc/amd/sabrina as copy of
soc/amd/cezanne landed in the tree, so port the change forward to
Sabrina.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I2e8df5e7b7f1ac0af772e8c565f616a68b28e29e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61358
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Compared to Cezanne there are 3 more UART controllers. Revision 1.50 of
the PPR #57243 was used as a reference.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I628b1a7a0930f3409acdcabda2b864d42bf6bd23
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61086
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
|
|
The Cezanne SoC code was initially started as a copy of example/min86
which only provides enough code to make the SoC code build. Then the
different parts of the real SoC support was brought in patch by patch
which also helped cleaning up and untangling the code. Since the Cezanne
SoC code is now in a rather good shape and the Sabrina SoC is similar to
the Cezanne SoC from the coreboot side, the new SoC support is started
with a copy of the Cezanne code and all the needed changes will be
applied on top of that. In order for the build not to fail due to
duplicate files, this patch does not only copy the directory, but also
replaces most instances of the Cezanne name with Sabrina. Since the
needed blobs aren't available in the 3rdparty/amd_blobs repository yet,
the Cezanne blobs are used for now so that the build will succeed. As
soon as the proper blobs will be available in that repository, the code
will be switched over to use them.
As suggested by Nico, I added a "TODO: Check if this is still correct"
comment to the beginning of every copied file and all SOC_AMD_COMMON_*
Kconfig option selects which will be removed after re-verifying that
each file and each selected common code block is still correct for the
new SoC.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I978ddbdbfd70863acac17d98732936ec2be8fe3c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/61077
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
