Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Even though it has an 'amd_' prefix, the amd_pci_domain_fill_ssdt
implementation doesn't contain any AMD-specific code and can also be
used by other SoCs. So factor it out, move the implementation to
src/acpi/acpigen_pci_root_resource_producer.c, and rename it to
pci_domain_fill_ssdt. When a SoC now assigns pci_domain_fill_ssdt to its
domain operation's acpi_fill_ssdt function pointer, the PCI domain
resource producer information will be added to the SSDT.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I7bd8568cf0b7051c74adbedfe0e416a0938ccb99
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80464
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Drop the unneeded data_fabric_set_mmio_np function and the corresponding
SOC_AMD_COMMON_BLOCK_DATA_FABRIC_NP_REGION Kconfig symbol. In systems
with only one FCH, its MMIO region will be subtractively decoded and
there's no need to add a non-posted data fabric MMIO region after the
FSP/openSIL has already configured the data fabric decode windows. In
systems with more than one FCH, openSIL will already take care of
initializing everything for the additional FCH, so we also won't need to
do anything in that case. Since dropping this function also removes both
data_fabric_print_mmio_conf calls before and after adding the unneeded
non-posted MMIO region, replace the data_fabric_set_mmio_np call with a
data_fabric_print_mmio_conf call to still print the data fabric MMIO
decode regions set up by the FSP/openSIL.
TEST=Mandolin still boots successfully
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I474b6e066060abb3fe5b78505521c7782cc192ee
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80355
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
|
|
Make the initialization of the IOAPIC(s) in the PCI root(s) common
across all AMD family 17h+ SoCs. For this the more general
implementation from the Genoa code that supports multiple PC roots is
moved to the common AMD code. All other family 17h+ SoCs are then
adapted to use the common code. For those non-Genoa SoCs, the
initialization of this second IOAPIC is moved from the northbridge
device to the domain device above to match Genoa.
Test=Both the FCH IOAPIC and the PCIe root IOAPIC are still initialized
on Mandolin
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I7c0ec6ac2f11cb11e46248cceec96c1fd2a49c16
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80286
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add the calls to the openSIL stubs to do the silicon initialization, to
get the APCI IO ports, and to get the memory map.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I6f37bf211e130cb44927f8a0e7f9134d246dfc1c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80296
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Only call amd_fsp_silicon_init if PLATFORM_USES_FSP2_0 is selected in
Kconfig. I'm not 100% sure about the data_fabric_set_mmio_np call yet,
but since it doesn't depend on PLATFORM_USES_FSP2_0 to compile, I'll
look into that one later.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I2666f1ac0f0354146ffe005b3ce99484defda7a8
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80242
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Varshit Pandya <pandyavarshit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
|
|
Macros can be confusing on their own; hiding commas make things worse.
This can sometimes be downright misleading. A "good" example would be
the code in soc/intel/xeon_sp/spr/chip.c:
CHIP_NAME("Intel SapphireRapids-SP").enable_dev = chip_enable_dev,
This appears as CHIP_NAME() being some struct when in fact these are
defining 2 separate members of the same struct.
It was decided to remove this macro altogether, as it does not do
anything special and incurs a maintenance burden.
Change-Id: Iaed6dfb144bddcf5c43634b0c955c19afce388f0
Signed-off-by: Nicholas Sudsgaard <devel+coreboot@nsudsgaard.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80239
Reviewed-by: Yidi Lin <yidilin@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
Reviewed-by: Jakub Czapiga <czapiga@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
|
|
Since the definition is the same for all SoCs, move it to the common
amdblock/acpi.h header. Since the Stoneyridge northbridge.c file also
includes this prototype, remove the static attribute of the function
there.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ib9aa215f2b4ba58f43fed2c751d989f1719e0a17
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80221
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
It's not the AGESA code that generates most of the ACPI tables, so
rename the function. This also aligns the other SoCs more with Genoa.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I6b2e6c4cb7139c8bde01b4440ab2e923a1086827
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80217
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Move the call into the FSP code to a file in the common AMD FSP code to
isolate the FSP-specific parts of the code.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ic8236db7ac80275a65020b7e7a9acce8314c831c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80084
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
|
|
Use the new common AMD code that gets the usable non-fixed MMIO windows
from the data fabric MMIO decode registers and generate the PCI0 _CRS
ACPI code based on those regions. For a more detailed description see
the corresponding patch that changes the Picasso code to use this new
code. In contrast to the Picasso code, this change will drop the
unneeded _STA method inside the PCI0 scope which wasn't present in
Picasso's ACPI code before it got replaced by the SSDT that gets
generated by amd_pci_domain_fill_ssdt.
BUG=b:283495475
TEST=Myst still boots and both the coreboot console and the kernel show
the expected PCI MMIO ranges being used.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I425876c4ef470574e00e123d36101641240c98cf
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/75559
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The device operations for the CPU bus are identical for all AMD SoCs, so
introduce a common device operations struct for this and use it in all
AMD SoC's chipset devicetrees as ops for the CPU cluster.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Id32f89b8a33db8dbb747b917eeac3009fbae6631
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71998
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
|
|
Now that the next generation of APUs is officially announced, we can
unmask morgana.
The chip formerly known as Morgana is actually Phoenix.
Surprise!
This patch just changes the name across the entire codebase.
Note that the fw.cfg file will stay pointing to the
3rdparty/amd_blobs/morgana/psp directory until the amd_blobs_repo is
updated.
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Change-Id: Ie9492a30ae9ff9cd7e15e0f2d239c32190ad4956
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71731
Reviewed-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Jason Glenesk <jason.glenesk@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|