| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The Genoa SoC has 6 I2C controllers. In order to support those, select
SOC_AMD_COMMON_BLOCK_I2C and implement the SoC-specific functions and
data structures needed by the common AMD I2C code. Since the common AMD
I2C code also reports if the controller is enabled or not in the SSDT,
change the corresponding DSDT code to use this information. In this
patch the I2C pad control registers don't get configured by coreboot yet
and we rely on ABL already having those set up correctly which seems to
be an assumption that the reference firmware is making too. PPR #55901
Rev 0.26 was used as a reference for the I2C controllers and the GPIO
pins being used.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Iebc10de6ea5c6d441cff04e016dcec62405078c3
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/78900
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Varshit Pandya <pandyavarshit@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch uses AMD SoC common code for MCA and adds MCA bank
information as per Genoa Processor Programming Reference (PPR)
version 0.25 (#55901) and uses AMD SoC common code.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Change-Id: If728d803d600f7e86507cd1b35b40022bf4d379e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76524
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
All CPUs properly come out of reset and relocate SMM.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Change-Id: I8c2d976addacd5a2ba70eb629510128853b9f847
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76523
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Commit e728766f4596 ("soc/amd/mendocino: Do not load MP2 Firmware when
in RO") added logic to ensure that the MP2 disable soft fuse bit was set
for the RO section, but failed to check if the bit was already set
otherwise (as it is for non-ChromeOS builds). This caused the bit to
appear twice in the PSP_RO_SOFTFUSE_BITS string, and when the string
was converted to a series of numeric values and added together, bit
(n+1) ended up being set instead of bit n.
To mitigate this, use the makefile sort() function to ensure the
PSP_[RO_]SOFTFUSE_BITS string does not contain any duplicates before
the bitmask is calculated. Apply this to all AMD SoC makefiles where
the softfuse bits are added.
TEST=build/boot google/skyrim (frostflow). Use a verbose build (V=1)
to verify that the correct soft fuse value is passed to amdfwtool for
RO and RW_A/B for both ChromeOS and non-ChromeOS builds.
Change-Id: I2e207e20132d44016fbcb986bdfd8e935d8fead5
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/78823
Reviewed-by: Eric Lai <ericllai@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
|
|
Use the common AMD data fabric resource reporting code to report how
openSIL distributed PCI buses, MMIO, and IO resources to coreboot's
resource allocator. This replaces the original CB:76521 which was
written back when the common AMD data fabric resource reporting code
didn't exist yet.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Change-Id: Ifcd655ea6d5565668ffee36d0d022b2b711c0b00
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/78342
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Varshit Pandya <pandyavarshit@gmail.com>
|
|
This functionality will eventually be used by the common data fabric
domain resource reporting code.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ieedd432c144e53e43d8099ec617a15056bb36fd1
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/78307
Reviewed-by: Eric Lai <ericllai@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Varshit Pandya <pandyavarshit@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I1529657f30b6e228c2e3cd7e0438255522381367
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76507
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I2e827e9ffbb2ec1be0f1247b77660a9fdeb04f7b
Signed-off-by: Varshit Pandya <pandyavarshit@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/78222
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ic9553e6016c92c9b1678c395cd6a9e6860bf8a76
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76506
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The SPL_TABLE_FILE and SPL_RW_AB_TABLE_FILE Kconfig options provide a
way to override the default SPL file configured in the SoC's fw.cfg file
by passing the '--spl-table' parameter to amdfwtool which will then use
the override instead of the SPL file from the fw.cfg file. When
SPL*_TABLE_FILE is an empty string, the corresponding add_opt_prefix
call in the makefile will result in no '--spl-table' parameter being
passed to amdfwtool, so it'll use the default SPL file from fw.cfg. In
order to not pass an SPL override by default, remove the default from
the SPL_TABLE_FILE in the SoC's Kconfig. The SoC default pointed to the
same SPL file as in fw.cfg file anyway. Now only when a mainboard sets
this option to point to a file, that file will be used as an override.
This override is used to include a special SPL file needed for the
verstage on PSP case on the Chromebooks. Since SPL_TABLE_FILE is an
empty string by default, neither the SPL_TABLE_FILE Kconfig option nor
it being evaluated in the Makefile need to be guarded by HAVE_SPL_FILE,
so remove the dependency in the Kconfig and the ifeq in the Makefile.
Before this patch, the HAVE_SPL_FILE option controlled two things that
shouldn't be controlled by the same Kconfig option: Only when
HAVE_SPL_FILE was set to y, the SPL_TABLE_FILE override was taken into
account, and it also controls if spl_fuse.c got added to the build which
when added will send the SPL fusing command to the PSP. So the case of
needing an SPL file override, but not updating the SPL fuses wasn't
supported before.
The SPL file in the amdfw part will be used by the PSP bootloader for
the anti-rollback feature which makes sure that the SPL file version
isn't lower than what is in the SPL fuses. For this the SPL file needs
to be present in the PSP directory table. The SPL version check happens
way before we're running code on the x86 cores. The SPL fusing PSP
command that can be sent by coreboot will tell the PSP to update the SPL
fuses so that the fused minimal SPL version will be updated to the
current SPL version.
Since the former HAVE_SPL_FILE option now only controls if the SPL
fusing command will be sent to the PSP mailbox, rename it to
PERFORM_SPL_FUSING to clarify what this will do and update the help text
correctly describe what this does.
TEST=With INCLUDE_CONFIG_FILE set to n, timeless builds for both Birman
with Phoenix APU and Skyrim result in identical binaries.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I6cec1f1b285fe48e81a961414fbc9978fa1003cc
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/78178
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Change-Id: Ifb4d7dda5fcf1ccacb901b24e4f7cf6945ee16e0
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76503
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Varshit Pandya <pandyavarshit@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Ie1ae2ba4d4833570ca0621023bdeed67ccabe5cb
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76501
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Varshit Pandya <pandyavarshit@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I5d5d3ff27ab0953844f9bbef30b6487fb480e29b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76500
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
|
|
Only the lower half of the flash gets memory mapped below 4G in the
current setup.
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Varshit Pandya <pandyavarshit@gmail.com>
Change-Id: Iffe5c17a50f3254411a4847c7e635ce0fd282fde
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76499
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
TESTED: AMD onyx reaches x86 code
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Signed-off-by: Varshit Pandya <pandyavarshit@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I95d84f93663a80f322fd4d7cdeb35ccfe0ec7d21
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76498
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martin.roth@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Change-Id: I639fb1e911a7449d0db0d2bfcfbb6f4f225b0cef
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76496
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@amd.corp-partner.google.com>
|
|
This adds a dummy soc (genoa) based on EXAMPLE_MIN86 with
amd linker script hooked up.
Default to 64bit code as that will be a sensible default for this
platform (high memory access required for RAS setup).
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Change-Id: I69253466084d17c4359d7e824d69f12490b076e4
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/76495
Reviewed-by: Martin L Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
