Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
I'm not 100% sure if this should rather be duplicated from Picasso or
commonized. Checked with the docs and this won't be compatible with
Stoneyridge and one future product's PPR lacked the corresponding
register. Some other chip has a compatible register layout, but a
different number of PCIe GPP clock outputs, so the common code would
need to use some SoC-dependent defines and possibly a SoC-specific
lookup table for the mapping which is also not that great.
TEST=Checked Cezanne PPR
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I6b6d0cb8d7eb0288d8a18fcb975dc377b2c6846a
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54685
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Cezanne must use cold resets. Change the warm reset request to always
set TOGGLE_ALL_PWR_GOOD. And, since the bit is sticky across power
cycles, set it early for good measure.
BUG=b:184281092
TEST=Majolica successfully resets using 0xcf9
Signed-off-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Change-Id: I7d4ca5665335b20100a5c802d12d79c0d0597ad9
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52982
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
This uses the new FSP PCI methods to pull the routing table and populate
the pirq data structure.
BUG=b:184766519
TEST=Boot guybrush and verify we get Got IRQ 0x1F (disabled) messages
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ie21229cc2fb4fd5b85c0b9e933f7b43af24864b0
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52914
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
BUG=b:184549804
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I4ebbe9667d18a96b1a363d0353c612e214699d12
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52273
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Add I2C initialization in romstage and ramstage.
TEST=To test the I2C connection on Majolica, which doesn't have SPD
connection, call the function below after i2c_soc_init is called.
i2c_read_bytes(2, 0x4d, addr, data, 1);/* Read out 1 byte one time */
It can get the register values of TMP432B.
Or
/* Override EC port in ec.h */
#define EC_DATA 0x662
#define EC_SC 0x666
ec_write(0xA9, 0x40);
i2c_read_bytes(1, 0x10, addr, data, 2);/* Read out 2 bytes one time */
It can get the register values of CM32181A3OP(ALS).
Change-Id: I3a2a1494b44b68e8d8204fba0c90e769e0256e6f
Signed-off-by: Zheng Bao <fishbaozi@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51029
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
These definitions were identical to picasso. The only thing I changed
was that I renamed Misc1 and Misc2 to HPET_L and HPET_H.
This change still doesn't write the PCI_IRQ register for all the PCI
devices. We need to refactor the picasso pci_gpp code first.
TEST=Boot majolica and see FCH IRQs being programmed.
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Ic7e637f234d3af426959a9bbd82a0dcf25bb3c8e
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50451
Reviewed-by: Mathew King <mathewk@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ie7bab29ae8d0e28c392210f8dcbaa4441ca61114
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50454
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The offsets of ACPI_CPU_CONTROL and ACPI_GPE0_BLK match the ones from
the reference code, but not the PPR. I've submitted a change request for
the PPR, so this mismatch might go away in the future. The case for
HAVE_SMI_HANDLER will be implemented in a future patch. If that one ends
up being identical to the function in soc/amd/picasso, I'll move it to
the common AMD SoC code.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: If80b841df12d351d5a0c1e0d2e7bf1e31b03447f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50270
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I38c6961b65b89cb57ff80e491bf8973be4e12eeb
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50094
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|