Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
SMMINFO is already set up in S5, so it should be skipped in S3 resume
BUG=b:194990818
TEST=Build guybrush
Change-Id: I30ee6d7006ddac4dbdae9825bd4fa6eac7fd48cb
Signed-off-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/63025
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Implementation for setup_lapic() did two things -- call
enable_lapic() and virtual_wire_mode_init().
In PARALLEL_MP case enable_lapic() was redundant as it
was already executed prior to initialize_cpu() call.
For the !PARALLEL_MP case enable_lapic() is added to
AP CPUs.
Change-Id: I5caf94315776a499e9cf8f007251b61f51292dc5
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58387
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
When the mp_init_with_smm call returns a failure, coreboot can't just
continue with the initialization and boot process due to the system
being in a bad state. Ignoring the failure here would just cause the
boot process failing elsewhere where it may not be obvious that the
failed multi-processor initialization step was the root cause of that.
I'm not 100% sure if calling do_cold_reset or calling die_with_post_code
is the better option here. Calling do_cold_reset likely here would
likely result in a boot-failure loop, so I call die_with_post_code here.
BUG=b:193809448
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ifeadffb3bae749c4bbd7ad2f3f395201e67d9e28
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58859
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Each CPU/SoC checks the return value of the mp_init_with_smm and prints
the same error message if it wasn't successful, so move this check and
printk to mp_init_with_smm. For this the original mp_init_with_smm
function gets renamed to do_mp_init_with_smm and a new mp_init_with_smm
function is created which then calls do_mp_init_with_smm, prints the
error if it didn't return CB_SUCCESS and passes the return value of
do_mp_init_with_smm to its caller.
Since no CPU/SoC code handles a mp_init_with_smm failure apart from
printing a message, also add a comment at the mp_init_with_smm call
sites that the code might want to handle a failure.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I181602723c204f3e43eb43302921adf7a88c81ed
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58498
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Using cb_err as return type clarifies the meaning of the different
return values. This patch also adds the types.h include that provides
the definition of the cb_err enum and checks the return value of
mp_init_with_smm against the enum values instead of either checking if
it's non-zero or less than zero to handle the error case.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ibcd4a9a63cc87fe176ba885ced0f00832587d492
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58491
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ia489dbfba59c334cf29f96a4000cef73b9b797d4
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/56279
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Currently the MCA support for Cezanne only clears the MCA status
registers. The MCA error handling and BERT table generation will be
added in subsequent patches.
Change-Id: Ib9b5174186c28c8c82f57ffd8936c8dad4e63c5b
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/56262
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The warm reset bit in the NCP_ERR register doesn't behave as the PPR [1]
suggested; no matter if something was written to the register, the
NCP_WARM_BOOT bit never got set and the NCP_ERR register in I/O-space
always reads back as 0x7f.
[1] checked with PPR for AMD Family 19h Model 51h A1 (CZN) #56569 Rev
3.01
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I569372db9f36ec7bbc741f4d7312ade312daa70b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55101
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Trying to limit the number of available cores by setting the MAX_CPUS
Kconfig option to a lower value than the SoC's default might result in
cores being enabled in the FSP-S, but not fully initialized in coreboot
which will cause some malfunction. Add a static assert to make sure
that this option isn't changed from the default. To limit the maximum
number of cores, use the downcore_mode and disable_smt devicetree
settings instead.
BUG=b:184162768
TEST=Build fails if MAX_CPUS isn't the expected default.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Idd6aa1d99128b17218a8e910c33415218a58578f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52606
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Even though the implementation is different on Stoneyridge compared to
Picasso and Cezanne, the function prototypes are identical, so move them
to the AMD SoC common reset header file.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I8d3a3a9ea568ea18658c49612efabdbe36d5f957
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51395
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I38d52394b5f6ffb837fa753fc9e82c0450c6aae3
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50505
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
TEST=Boot majolica and see microcode update
CBFS: Found 'cpu_microcode_blob.bin' @0x6900 size 0x15c0 in mcache @0xcf7fe9d8
microcode: patch id to apply = 0x0a50000b
microcode: being updated to patch id = 0x0a50000b succeeded
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: If50b1d8b3ebf4b3e6f8a9dd3ab96073e0cb92424
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50616
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Change-Id: I845a7e2cfea58ca08cd2a6f0d884dbbbe1a7bdef
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50483
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The MCA MSRs aren't getting cleared and no microcode update gets applied
for now. Both will be added later.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I38ce5d11787ffefdd0183c5540ae2683158cbee8
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50482
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I54299cadae4cb562e04a16c3b8e051c9c454db79
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50404
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|