Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
This makes it easier to have common code for MP init on AMD systems.
Change-Id: Icb6808edf96a17ec0b3073ba2486b3345a4a66ea
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/64867
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
The syscfg has to option to automatically mark the range between 4G and
TOM2, which contains DRAM, as WB. Making it generally not necessary to
allocate MTRRs for memory above 4G if no PCI BARs are placed up there.
Change-Id: Ifbacae28e272ab2f39f268ad034354a9c590d035
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/64868
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
SMMINFO is already set up in S5, so it should be skipped in S3 resume
BUG=b:194990818
TEST=Build guybrush
Change-Id: I30ee6d7006ddac4dbdae9825bd4fa6eac7fd48cb
Signed-off-by: Fred Reitberger <reitbergerfred@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/63025
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Implementation for setup_lapic() did two things -- call
enable_lapic() and virtual_wire_mode_init().
In PARALLEL_MP case enable_lapic() was redundant as it
was already executed prior to initialize_cpu() call.
For the !PARALLEL_MP case enable_lapic() is added to
AP CPUs.
Change-Id: I5caf94315776a499e9cf8f007251b61f51292dc5
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58387
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
When the mp_init_with_smm call returns a failure, coreboot can't just
continue with the initialization and boot process due to the system
being in a bad state. Ignoring the failure here would just cause the
boot process failing elsewhere where it may not be obvious that the
failed multi-processor initialization step was the root cause of that.
I'm not 100% sure if calling do_cold_reset or calling die_with_post_code
is the better option here. Calling do_cold_reset likely here would
likely result in a boot-failure loop, so I call die_with_post_code here.
BUG=b:193809448
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ifeadffb3bae749c4bbd7ad2f3f395201e67d9e28
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58859
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Each CPU/SoC checks the return value of the mp_init_with_smm and prints
the same error message if it wasn't successful, so move this check and
printk to mp_init_with_smm. For this the original mp_init_with_smm
function gets renamed to do_mp_init_with_smm and a new mp_init_with_smm
function is created which then calls do_mp_init_with_smm, prints the
error if it didn't return CB_SUCCESS and passes the return value of
do_mp_init_with_smm to its caller.
Since no CPU/SoC code handles a mp_init_with_smm failure apart from
printing a message, also add a comment at the mp_init_with_smm call
sites that the code might want to handle a failure.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I181602723c204f3e43eb43302921adf7a88c81ed
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58498
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
Using cb_err as return type clarifies the meaning of the different
return values. This patch also adds the types.h include that provides
the definition of the cb_err enum and checks the return value of
mp_init_with_smm against the enum values instead of either checking if
it's non-zero or less than zero to handle the error case.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Ibcd4a9a63cc87fe176ba885ced0f00832587d492
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58491
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ia489dbfba59c334cf29f96a4000cef73b9b797d4
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/56279
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Currently the MCA support for Cezanne only clears the MCA status
registers. The MCA error handling and BERT table generation will be
added in subsequent patches.
Change-Id: Ib9b5174186c28c8c82f57ffd8936c8dad4e63c5b
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/56262
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
|
|
The warm reset bit in the NCP_ERR register doesn't behave as the PPR [1]
suggested; no matter if something was written to the register, the
NCP_WARM_BOOT bit never got set and the NCP_ERR register in I/O-space
always reads back as 0x7f.
[1] checked with PPR for AMD Family 19h Model 51h A1 (CZN) #56569 Rev
3.01
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I569372db9f36ec7bbc741f4d7312ade312daa70b
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55101
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Trying to limit the number of available cores by setting the MAX_CPUS
Kconfig option to a lower value than the SoC's default might result in
cores being enabled in the FSP-S, but not fully initialized in coreboot
which will cause some malfunction. Add a static assert to make sure
that this option isn't changed from the default. To limit the maximum
number of cores, use the downcore_mode and disable_smt devicetree
settings instead.
BUG=b:184162768
TEST=Build fails if MAX_CPUS isn't the expected default.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: Idd6aa1d99128b17218a8e910c33415218a58578f
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/52606
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Even though the implementation is different on Stoneyridge compared to
Picasso and Cezanne, the function prototypes are identical, so move them
to the AMD SoC common reset header file.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I8d3a3a9ea568ea18658c49612efabdbe36d5f957
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51395
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I38d52394b5f6ffb837fa753fc9e82c0450c6aae3
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50505
Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
TEST=Boot majolica and see microcode update
CBFS: Found 'cpu_microcode_blob.bin' @0x6900 size 0x15c0 in mcache @0xcf7fe9d8
microcode: patch id to apply = 0x0a50000b
microcode: being updated to patch id = 0x0a50000b succeeded
Signed-off-by: Raul E Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org>
Change-Id: If50b1d8b3ebf4b3e6f8a9dd3ab96073e0cb92424
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50616
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Change-Id: I845a7e2cfea58ca08cd2a6f0d884dbbbe1a7bdef
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50483
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The MCA MSRs aren't getting cleared and no microcode update gets applied
for now. Both will be added later.
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I38ce5d11787ffefdd0183c5540ae2683158cbee8
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50482
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Change-Id: I54299cadae4cb562e04a16c3b8e051c9c454db79
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/50404
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
|