summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/security/vboot
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2020-05-01security/vboot: Convert reboot-related errors to vboot2-styleYu-Ping Wu
Error codes are renamed as follows: VBERROR_SHUTDOWN_REQUESTED --> VB2_REQUEST_SHUTDOWN VBERROR_REBOOT_REQUIRED --> VB2_REQUEST_REBOOT VBERROR_EC_REBOOT_TO_SWITCH_RW --> VB2_REQUEST_REBOOT_EC_SWITCH_RW VBERROR_EC_REBOOT_TO_RO_REQUIRED --> VB2_REQUEST_REBOOT_EC_TO_RO BRANCH=none BUG=b:124141368, chromium:988410 TEST=emerge-nami coreboot Cq-Depend: chromium:2143030 Change-Id: Id82cf85f49dfb63a9c3d41aacd3969786bffcac7 Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40749 Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-28vboot: Always build secdata functions for romstageJulius Werner
Since CB:40389, all platforms with CONFIG_VBOOT_EARLY_EC_SYNC need to write back secdata in romstage. Those platforms currently all happen to have CONFIG_VBOOT_SEPARATE_VERSTAGE set as well, but there's no official dependency between those options. Change the Makefile to unconditionally build the secdata access routines for romstage so that this would work on other platforms as well. Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Change-Id: I0b3c79e9bb8af9d09ef91f5749953ca109dd2a40 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40760 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Daisuke Nojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2020-04-28security/lockdown: Write-protect WP_ROPatrick Rudolph
Allow to write protect only the WP_RO region in case of enabled VBOOT. One can either lock the boot device in VERSTAGE early if VBOOT is enabled, or late in RAMSTAGE. Both options have their downsides as explained below. Lock early if you don't trust the code that's stored in the writeable flash partition. This prevents write-protecting the MRC cache, which is written in ramstage. In case the contents of the MRC cache are corrupted this can lead to system instability or trigger unwanted code flows inside the firmware. Lock late if you trust the code that's stored in the writeable flash partition. This allows write-protecting the MRC cache, but if a vulnerability is found in the code of the writeable partition an attacker might be able to overwrite the whole flash as it hasn't been locked yet. Change-Id: I72c3e1a0720514b9b85b0433944ab5fb7109b2a2 Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com> Signed-off-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32705 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
2020-04-23rules.h: Rename ENV_VERSTAGE to ENV_SEPARATE_VERSTAGEJulius Werner
When CONFIG_SEPARATE_VERSTAGE=n, all verstage code gets linked into the appropriate calling stage (bootblock or romstage). This means that ENV_VERSTAGE is actually 0, and instead ENV_BOOTBLOCK or ENV_ROMSTAGE are 1. This keeps tripping up people who are just trying to write a simple "are we in verstage (i.e. wherever the vboot init logic runs)" check, e.g. for TPM init functions which may run in "verstage" or ramstage depending on whether vboot is enabled. Those checks will not work as intended for CONFIG_SEPARATE_VERSTAGE=n. This patch renames ENV_VERSTAGE to ENV_SEPARATE_VERSTAGE to try to clarify that this macro can really only be used to check whether code is running in a *separate* verstage, and clue people in that they may need to cover the linked-in verstage case as well. Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Change-Id: I2ff3a3c3513b3db44b3cff3d93398330cd3632ea Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40582 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2020-04-23vboot: Add permission check for kernel spaceDaisuke Nojiri
This patch restores the permission check for the kernel space which was dropped when read_space_kernel was moved from Depthcharge by CL:2155429. BUG=chromium:1045217, chromium:1020578 BRANCH=none TEST=none Signed-off-by: dnojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> Change-Id: If6d487940f39865cadc0ca9d5de6e055ad3e017d Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40579 Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-04-20security/vboot, mb/google: Fix build errorsPatrick Georgi
There have been two cases of incompatibilities between overlapping changes, and they need to be resolved in a single commit to unbreak the tree: 1. CB:40389 introduced a new use of write_secdata while CB:40359 removed that function in favor of safe_write. Follow the refactor of the latter in the code introduced by the former. 2. CB:39849 changed google_chromeec_get_usb_pd_power_info()'s interface and adapted all its users. Except for duffy and kaisa which were only added in CB:40223 and CB:40393 respectively, so reapply the patch to puff's mainboard.c to their mainboard.c files. Change-Id: Ib8dfcd61bb79e0a487eaa60e719bd93561f2d97a Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40518 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com> Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
2020-04-20vboot/secdata: remove retries, readback, and CRC checkJoel Kitching
Depthcharge trusts that our TPM driver is working reliably, and so should we. Also remove CRC check -- the value returned by antirollback_read_space_firmware() is dropped in vboot_logic.c verstage_main(), and vboot handles this check internally. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:972956 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I5d3f3823fca8507fd58087bb0f7b78cfa49417ab Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40359 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-04-20vboot: remove leftover TPM_PCR_GBB constantsJoel Kitching
These constants were left behind after the code using them was relocated in CB:34510. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:972956 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I6ce7c969a9e9bdf6cdce3343ba666a08b3521f27 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40358 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-04-17ec_sync: Run EFS2 in romstagednojiri
EFS2 allows EC RO to enable PD for special cases. When doing so, it sets NO_BOOT flag to avoid booting the OS. AP needs to get NO_BOOT flag from Cr50 and enforce that. This patch makes verstage get a boot mode and a mirrored hash stored in kernel secdata from Cr50. This patch also makes romstage write an expected EC hash (a.k.a. Hexp) to Cr50 (if there is an update). BUG=b:147298634, chromium:1045217, b:148259137 BRANCH=none TEST=Verify software sync succeeds on Puff. Signed-off-by: dnojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> Change-Id: I1f387b6e920205b9cc4c8536561f2a279c36413d Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40389 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-04-10assert.h: Simplify dead_code()Nico Huber
It turns out the linker's error message already includes the line number of the dead_code() invocation. If we don't include the line number in the identifier for our undefined reference, we don't need individual identifiers at all and can work with a single, global declaration. Change-Id: Ib63868ce3114c3f839867a3bfb1b03bdb6facf16 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40240 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2020-04-04assert.h: Add a tag parameter to dead_code()Nico Huber
When dead_code() is used in inline functions in a header file, the generated function names (based on the line number) may collide with a dead_code() in the code file. Now that we are hit by such a case, we need a quick solution: Add a tag argument for all invocations in header files. Change-Id: I0c548ce998cf8e28ae9f76b5c0ea5630b4e91ae2 Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40140 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
2020-04-04src/security: Use SPDX for GPL-2.0-only filesAngel Pons
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now. Change-Id: I51f5764b57fb8b62e3a4b3d41bd32e5330a2983c Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40057 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
2020-03-31security/vboot: relocate and rename vboot_platform_is_resuming()Bill XIE
After measured boot is decoupled from verified boot in CB:35077, vboot_platform_is_resuming() is never vboot-specific, thus it is renamed to platform_is_resuming() and declared in bootmode.h. Change-Id: I29b5b88af0576c34c10cfbd99659a5cdc0c75842 Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39103 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-03-31security/vboot: Decouple measured boot from verified bootBill XIE
Currently, those who want to use measured boot implemented within vboot should enable verified boot first, along with sections such as GBB and RW slots defined with manually written fmd files, even if they do not actually want to verify anything. As discussed in CB:34977, measured boot should be decoupled from verified boot and make them two fully independent options. Crypto routines necessary for measurement could be reused, and TPM and CRTM init should be done somewhere other than vboot_logic_executed() if verified boot is not enabled. In this revision, only TCPA log is initialized during bootblock. Before TPM gets set up, digests are not measured into tpm immediately, but cached in TCPA log, and measured into determined PCRs right after TPM is up. This change allows those who do not want to use the verified boot scheme implemented by vboot as well as its requirement of a more complex partition scheme designed for chromeos to make use of the measured boot functionality implemented within vboot library to measure the boot process. TODO: Measure MRC Cache somewhere, as MRC Cache has never resided in CBFS any more, so it cannot be covered by tspi_measure_cbfs_hook(). Change-Id: I1fb376b4a8b98baffaee4d574937797bba1f8aee Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35077 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
2020-03-17src (minus soc and mainboard): Remove copyright noticesPatrick Georgi
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example: - What's a "Copyright $year-present"? - Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current copyright holder? - People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even though they only deleted stuff - Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year, because why not? - Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"? - Or "Generated Code"? Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead and use the git history to deal with the rest. Change-Id: I89b10076e0f4a4b3acd59160fb7abe349b228321 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39611 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-03-12vboot: remove extraneous vboot_recovery_mode_memory_retrainJoel Kitching
Just call get_recovery_mode_retrain_switch() directly. BUG=b:124141368 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Icb88d6862db1782e0218276984e527638b21fd3a Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39343 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2020-03-07vboot: Upgrade kernel space to v1.0dnojiri
This patch upgrades the kernel space to v1.0 to accommodate EC hash, which is used for CrOS EC's early firmware selection. BUG=chromium:1045217 BRANCH=none TEST=Boot Helios. Verify software sync works. Cq-Depend: chromium:2041695 Change-Id: I525f1551afd1853cae826e87198057410167b239 Signed-off-by: dnojiri <dnojiri@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39137 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-03-06security/vboot: Support enabling EC EFS with EC software syncSam McNally
If the ChromeOS EC uses EC early firmware selection (EFS), the AP vboot build must also enable EC EFS. Add an option to control this, passing it through to vboot. BUG=b:150742950 TEST=none BRANCH=none Signed-off-by: Sam McNally <sammc@chromium.org> Change-Id: I697e90748e19d15af154011413b30c0f2a0bf52e Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39272 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <quasisec@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
2020-02-24treewide: Capitalize 'CMOS'Elyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: I1d36e554618498d70f33f6c425b0abc91d4fb952 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38928 Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-02-24vboot: remove rogue vboot_struct.h includeJoel Kitching
As part of vboot1 deprecation, remove an unused vboot_struct.h include. coreboot is now free of vboot1 data structure use. One vboot_api.h include remains as part of security/vboot/ec_sync.c. BUG=b:124141368 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I042d692aa252f8f859d4005455eb6a2eabc24a87 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39024 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-02-19vboot: use vb2api_get_recovery_reason functionJoel Kitching
Use vb2api_get_recovery_reason() API function rather than accessing vb2_shared_data internals. Of all the vanilla verified boot code in coreboot, this is the last remaining use of vboot's internal data structures in coreboot. There remains only one sole instance in Eltan's code. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:957880 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I845c9b14ffa830bc7de28e9a38188f7066871803 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Cq-Depend: chromium:2055662 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38886 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-02-18security/vboot: Correct help text of VBOOT_STARTS_IN_ROMSTAGEYu-Ping Wu
Since CB:37231 [1], the vboot working data has been replaced with vboot work buffer, so corrrect the help text of option VBOOT_STARTS_IN_ROMSTAGE accordingly. [1] security/vboot: Remove struct vboot_working_data BRANCH=none BUG=chromium:1021452 TEST=none Change-Id: I80783274179ae7582bbb4c8f9d392895623badce Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38900 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
2020-02-17vboot: rename GBB flag FAFT_KEY_OVERIDE to FLAG_RUNNING_FAFTJoel Kitching
This was renamed in vboot_reference CL:1977902. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:965914 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I79af304e9608a30c6839cd616378c7330c3de00a Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37462 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-02-17vboot: remove VBOOT_SAVE_RECOVERY_REASON_ON_REBOOT optionJoel Kitching
With CL:1940398, this option is no longer needed. Recovery requests are not cleared until kernel verification stage is reached. If the FSP triggers any reboots, recovery requests will be preserved. In particular: - Manual requests will be preserved via recovery switch state, whose behaviour is modified in CB:38779. - Other recovery requests will remain in nvdata across reboot. These functions now only work after verstage has run: int vboot_check_recovery_request(void) int vboot_recovery_mode_enabled(void) int vboot_developer_mode_enabled(void) BUG=b:124141368, b:35576380 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I52d17a3c6730be5c04c3c0ae020368d11db6ca3c Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38780 Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-02-17vboot: push clear recovery mode switch until BS_WRITE_TABLESJoel Kitching
Serves two purposes: (1) On some platforms, FSP initialization may cause a reboot. Push clearing the recovery mode switch until after FSP code runs, so that a manual recovery request (three-finger salute) will function correctly under this condition. (2) The recovery mode switch value is needed at BS_WRITE_TABLES for adding an event to elog. (Previously this was done by stashing the value in CBMEM_ID_EC_HOSTEVENT.) BUG=b:124141368, b:35576380 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I30c02787c620b937e5a50a5ed94ac906e3112dad Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38779 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2020-02-14vboot: fix up some includesJoel Kitching
These header files need to make use of vb2_shared_data. Remove the last vestiges of vboot1 data structures in coreboot. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:1038260 TEST=Build locally with CL:2054269 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I61b27e33751c11aac9f8af261a75d83b003b5f92 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38884 Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-02-10vboot: correct workbuf size when VBOOT_STARTS_IN_ROMSTAGEJoel Kitching
Part of the design of vboot persistent context is that the workbuf gets placed in CBMEM and stays there for depthcharge to use in kernel verification. As such, the space allocated in CBMEM needs to be at least VB2_KERNEL_WORKBUF_RECOMMENDED_SIZE. In the VBOOT_STARTS_IN_ROMSTAGE case, prior to this CL, vboot_get_context() would get invoked for the first time after CBMEM comes up, and it would only allocate VB2_FIRMWARE_WORKBUF_RECOMMENDED_SIZE. Initialize the workbuf directly in vboot_setup_cbmem() instead with the correct VB2_KERNEL_WORKBUF_RECOMMENDED_SIZE. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:994060 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild TEST=boot on GOOGLE_EVE with VBOOT_STARTS_IN_ROMSTAGE set BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ie09c39f960b3f14f3a64c648eee6ca3f23214d9a Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38778 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Raul Rangel <rrangel@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-02-07security/vboot: relocate vb2ex_abort and vb2ex_printfJoel Kitching
Enabling an assertion in vb2_member_of() results in coreboot linking vb2ex_abort() and vb2ex_printf() in ramstage. Move these two functions from vboot_logic.c to vboot_lib.c, which is should be enabled in all stages if CONFIG_VBOOT_LIB is enabled. Note that CONFIG_VBOOT_LIB is implied by CONFIG_VBOOT. Relevant vboot_reference commit: CL:2037263. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:1005700 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ica0103c5684b3d50ba7dc1b4c39559cb192efa81 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38706 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
2020-02-05vendorcode/eltan/security: Switch to vb2 vboot libraryWim Vervoorn
The eltan verified_boot is using the vboot 2.1 data structures and code, as well as the fwlib21 build target, they are all deprecated. Refer to CB:37654 for more information. The verified_boot code is updated to use the vb2 structures and code and make sure only public functions are used. BUG=N/A TEST=build Change-Id: I1e1a7bce6110fe35221a4d7a47c1eb7c7074c318 Signed-off-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38590 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
2020-01-25vboot: Remove hard dependency on MISSING_BOARD_RESETJulius Werner
Having a working board reset is certainly better when you're running vboot (because otherwise you'll hang when transitioning into recovery mode), but I don't think it should be strictly required, since it's still somewhat usable without. This is particularly important for certain test platforms that don't have a good way to reset but might still be useful for vboot testing/prototyping. Change-Id: Ia765f54b6e2e176e2d54478fb1e0839d8cab9849 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38417 Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2020-01-18security/vboot: Allow UDC regardless of vboot stateWim Vervoorn
When a VBOOT enabled system is used without ChromeOS it may be valid to allow the UDC independent of the vboot state. Provide the option to always allow UDC when CHROMEOS is not selected. BUG=N/A TEST=build Change-Id: I6142c4a74ca6930457b16f62f32e1199b8baaff8 Signed-off-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38403 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2020-01-18cbfs: Remove locator conceptJulius Werner
When vboot was first integrated into CBFS it was still part of Google vendorcode. So to not directly tie custom vendorcode into the core CBFS library, the concept of cbfs_locator was introduced to decouple core code from an arbitrary amount of platform-specific implementations that want to decide where the CBFS can be found. Nowadays vboot is a core coreboot feature itself, and the locator concept isn't used by anything else anymore. This patch simplifies the code by removing it and just calling vboot from the CBFS library directly. That should make it easier to more closely integrate vboot into CBFS in the future. Change-Id: I7b9112adc7b53aa218c58b8cb5c85982dcc1dbc0 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38419 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2020-01-10src/security: Fix typosElyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: I238fce2d48cf62003a701f972a87974415419538 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/38198 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
2019-12-26src: Remove unused include <string.h>Elyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: Ic6b66dd8fa387e67bb0ce609fb7e2553eeb66b3c Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2019-12-20security/vboot: Add a dedicated flag for building of vboot libraryBill XIE
As discussed in CB:35077, since both measured boot and verified boot depends on vboot library, it had better to introduce a dedicated flag CONFIG_VBOOT_LIB to control the building and linking of the vboot library, and make other flags needing vboot library select it. Only the actual verification stuff should be conditional on CONFIG_VBOOT. Change-Id: Ia1907a11c851ee45a70582e02bdbe08fb18cc6a4 Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37787 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
2019-12-19src/security: Remove unused <stdlib.h>Elyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: I0b5c375baf7911ebced2f8c43a88aae014c877ad Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33694 Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-12-19arch/x86: Drop uses of ROMCC_BOOTBLOCKArthur Heymans
Change-Id: Ia0405fdd448cb31b3c6ca3b3d76e49e9f430bf74 Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37339 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
2019-12-18vboot: remove 2lib headers from MakefileJoel Kitching
Only headers from firmware/lib should be imported. As far as I can tell, nothing imports 2lib headers directly anymore, so we can get rid of this CFLAG. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:968464 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ie5f3fe1d0180113b332e57ed07d4cfe563e7ecf2 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37786 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2019-12-18vboot: Fix MOCK_SECDATA for new naming schemeJulius Werner
CB:37655 updated all secdata_xxx to secdata_firmware_xxx, but forgot the code that's only compiled when MOCK_SECDATA is set. This patch fixes it. Change-Id: Icf12fe405d7ce46345ccbdcb76f6aa1b56ed0194 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37772 Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-12-13security/vboot: Ensure firmware body size is respected againJulius Werner
CB:36845 simplified how coreboot finds the RW CBFS after vboot has and eliminated a layer of caching. Unfortunately, we missed the fact that the former cached value didn't exactly match the FMAP section... it was in fact truncated to the data actually used by vboot. That patch unintentionally broke this truncation which leads to performance regressions on certain CBFS accesses. This patch makes use of a new API function added to vboot (CL:1965920) which we can use to retrieve the real firmware body length as before. (Also stop making all the vb2_context pointers const. vboot generally never marks context pointers as const in its API functions, even when the function doesn't modify the context. Therefore constifying it inside coreboot just makes things weird because it prevents you from calling random API functions for no reason. If we really want const context pointers, that's a refactoring that would have to start inside vboot first.) This patch brings in upstream vboot commit 4b0408d2: 2019-12-12 Julius Werner 2lib: Move firmware body size reporting to separate function Change-Id: I167cd40cb435dbae7f09d6069c9f1ffc1d99fe13 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37680 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Mathew King <mathewk@chromium.org>
2019-12-12vboot: update secdata naming schemeJoel Kitching
secdata -> secdata_firmware secdatak -> secdata_kernel BUG=b:124141368, chromium:972956 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ie2051de51c8f483a8921831385557fad816eb9fb Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37655 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-12-10vboot: remove old vboot_fill_handoff function headerJoel Kitching
This function was removed in CB:33535. BUG=b:124141368 TEST=make clean && make runtests BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ifded75319c92dcbb4befbb3fbecc1cd2df8a9ad0 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37588 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-12-09EC sync: Properly handle VBERROR return codes from vb2api_ec_syncTim Wawrzynczak
Some return codes were missed when implementing this initially; the vboot logic can require the system to command the EC to reboot to its RO, switch RW slots or it can require a poweroff of the SoC. This patch appropriately handles these return codes. BUG=b:145768046 BRANCH=firmware-hatch-12672.B TEST=ODM verified this patch fixes the issues seen. Change-Id: I2748cf626d49c255cb0274cb336b072dcdf8cded Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37562 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-12-06vboot: Clear secdata change flags after factory initJulius Werner
factory_initialize_tpm() calls secdata_xxx_create() (for both firmware and kernel space) and then immediately writes those spaces out to the TPM. The create() functions make vboot think it just changed the secdata (because it reinitialized the byte arrays in the context), so we also need to clear the VB2_CONTEXT_SECDATA_xxx_CHANGED flags again, otherwise vboot thinks it still needs to flush the spaces out to the TPM even though we already did that. Also clean up some minor related stuff (VB2_CONTEXT_SECDATA_CHANGED notation is deprecated, and secdata space intialization should use the same write-and-readback function we use for updates). Change-Id: I231fadcf7b35a1aec3b39254e7e41c3d456d4911 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37471 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2019-12-06vboot: update VbExNvStorageWrite functionJoel Kitching
Going forwards, vb2ex_commit_data will be used to flush both nvdata and secdata. The patch that is circularly dependent on this lies between a patch that makes vboot no longer build and the patch that fixes that, so we have to pull the whole thing in at once to sort out the mess. Updating from commit id 1c4dbaa0: 2019-11-18 Julius Werner Makefile: Fix typo for MOCK_TPM to commit id 695c56dc: 2019-12-04 Julius Werner Makefile: Make loop unrolling fully controllable by the caller BUG=b:124141368, chromium:1006689 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ia2612da0df101cd3c46151dbce728633a39fada1 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37315 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2019-12-02src: Move 'static' to the beginning of declarationElyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: I9b2cc1bb58922d9e32202ea4c20b9aacfe308bad Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33673 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2019-12-02lib/coreboot_table: Add CBMEM_ID_VBOOT_WORKBUF pointer to coreboot tableYu-Ping Wu
Since struct vb2_shared_data already contains workbuf_size and vboot_workbuf_size is never used in depthcharge, remove it from struct sysinfo_t. In addition, remove lb_vboot_workbuf() and add CBMEM_ID_VBOOT_WORKBUF pointer to coreboot table with add_cbmem_pointers(). Parsing of coreboot table in libpayload is modified accordingly. BRANCH=none BUG=chromium:1021452 TEST=emerge-nami coreboot libpayload depthcharge; Akali booted correctly Change-Id: I890df3ff93fa44ed6d3f9ad05f9c6e49780a8ecb Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37234 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-12-02security/vboot: Remove struct vboot_working_dataYu-Ping Wu
After CB:36808, CB:36844 and CB:36845, all fields except buffer_offset were removed from struct vboot_working_data. Since buffer_offset is used to record the offset of the workbuf relative to the whole structure, it is no longer needed. This patch removes the structure, and renames vboot_get_working_data() to vboot_get_workbuf(). BRANCH=none BUG=chromium:1021452 TEST=emerge-nami coreboot Change-Id: I304a5e4236f13b1aecd64b88ca5c8fbc1526e592 Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37231 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
2019-11-29security/vboot: Drop CAR_GLOBAL_MIGRATION supportArthur Heymans
Change-Id: I9dee03da028b9111b685e325368815a86e444a47 Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37028 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2019-11-28security/vboot: Use persistent context to read GBB flagsJulius Werner
With the persistent vboot context coreboot no longer needs to read GBB flags from flash itself -- it can just ask vboot for the cached result. This patch removes the existing GBB code and provides gbb_is_flag_set() (with a slightly better namespaced name) as a static inline instead. Change-Id: Ibc3ed0f3fbeb53d630925d47df4dc474b0ed07ee Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37261 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
2019-11-26security/vboot: Remove duplicate offsetof() definitionJacob Garber
This macro is already defined in commonlib/helpers.h Change-Id: I1fce2936757b13807e254f4a844f583b938bf349 Signed-off-by: Jacob Garber <jgarber1@ualberta.ca> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37181 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-by: Alex James <theracermaster@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-11-25Kconfig: Drop the C_ENVIRONMENT_BOOTBLOCK symbolArthur Heymans
The romcc bootblock will be deprecated soon and most platforms use C_ENVIRONMENT_BOOTBLOCK already. This patch drops the CONFIG_C_ENVIRONMENT_BOOTBLOCK symbol and adds CONFIG_ROMCC_BOOTBLOCK where needed. Change-Id: I773a76aade623303b7cd95ebe9b0411e5a7ecbaf Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37154 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Michał Żygowski <michal.zygowski@3mdeb.com>
2019-11-22Makefiles: Remove -D__PRE_RAM__Kyösti Mälkki
All cases of testing for __PRE_RAM__ have been converted to equivalent ENV_xxx definitions from <rules.h>. Change-Id: Ib6cd598f17109cc1072818cebe4791f7410c3428 Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37075 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2019-11-20security/vboot: Build vboot library with same .a that depthcharge usesTim Wawrzynczak
Currently, depthcharge and coreboot are using two different vboot libraries. coreboot is using "fwlib20", while depthcharge uses "fwlib". The only difference between the two libraries is the inclusion of vboot1-only compilation units in fwlib, which are now deprecated. Therefore, coreboot may as well use fwlib too. Vboot is expected to converge on a single firmware library soon. BUG=none BRANCH=none TEST=compiles and runs verstage correctly Change-Id: I905b781c3596965ec7ef45a2a7eafe15fdd4d9cc Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36341 Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-11-20security/vboot/sync_ec: Add timestampsTim Wawrzynczak
Add 4 new timestamps to the EC software sync flow: 1) Beginning of EC software sync 2) EC finished calculating Vboot hash 3) EC is no longer requesting power limiting 4) End of EC software sync BUG=none BRANCH=none TEST=verified timestamps show up in cbmem log Change-Id: I6e5703c146b5ec27d01700fdb39cb3d2092ea8a8 Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36209 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-11-20security/vboot: Add vboot callbacks to support EC software syncTim Wawrzynczak
Use the new functions introduced into the EC driver to support performing EC software sync via vboot callbacks. NOTE: This patch assumes that the EC image is added to CBFS uncompressed. Streaming decompression of the image will be added in a future patch. Also adds a new Kconfig option VBOOT_EARLY_EC_SYNC. The new Kconfig option compiles EC software sync into romstage, dependent upon having a CrOS EC. BUG=b:112198832 BRANCH=none TEST=Successful EC software sync Change-Id: I9b1458a45ab3ed5623af50f78036c4f88461b226 Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36208 Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-11-20cbfs: switch to region_device for location APIsAaron Durbin
Drop struct cbfs_props and replace with struct region_device object. The goal of the cbfs locator APIs are to determine the correct region device to find the cbfs files. Therefore, start directly using struct region_device in the cbfs location paths. Update the users of the API and leverage the default boot region device implementation for apollolake. Change-Id: I0158a095cc64c9900d8738f8ffd45ae4040575ea Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36939 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-11-20security/vboot: Remove selected_region from struct vboot_working_dataYu-Ping Wu
Since we already have pre-RAM cache for FMAP (CB:36657), calling load_firmware() multiple times is no longer a problem. This patch replaces vboot_get_selected_region() usage with vboot_locate_firmware(), which locates the firmware by reading from the CBMEM cache. In addition, returning false from vboot_is_slot_selected() implies the recovery path was requested, i.e., vb2_shared_data.recovery_reason was set. Therefore, we simply remove the vboot_is_slot_selected() check from vboot_check_recovery_request(). BRANCH=none BUG=chromium:1021452 TEST=emerge-kukui coreboot Change-Id: I27cb1a2175beb189053fc3e44b17b60aba474bb0 Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36845 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-11-20security/vboot: Remove buffer_size from struct vboot_working_dataYu-Ping Wu
Since buffer_size is no longer used, remove it from struct vboot_working_data. BRANCH=none BUG=chromium:1021452 TEST=emerge-kukui coreboot Change-Id: Ie770e89b4a45e0ec703d5bbb8fb6a298ce915056 Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36844 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-11-19security/vboot: Remove vboot_named_region_device(_rw)Yu-Ping Wu
Remove vboot_named_region_device(_rw) and use fmap_locate_area_as_rdev(_rw) directly. BRANCH=none BUG=none TEST=emerge-kukui coreboot Change-Id: I244ac4e01ae5b80285162b3baffc0b30aa057bfb Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36922 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2019-11-16security/vboot: Add config option to always enable the displayWim Vervoorn
In order to always show the bootlogo very early in coreboot we need the option to always enable the display when VBOOT is enabled. To do this a config option is added to make sure this functionality can be provided without interfering with systems that require the standard VBOOT display handing. BUG=N/A TEST=tested on facebook fbg1701. Change-Id: I3ffaac85d2082717bb9608d536f7cec66a583789 Signed-off-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36547 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com> Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
2019-11-16vboot: remove vboot_possibly_executed functionJoel Kitching
vboot_possibly_executed previously provided some better compile-time code elimination, before CB:32716 made vboot_logic_executed capable of that directly. BUG=b:124141368, TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: If5ca8f03c51e1ced20e1215b1cfdde54da3d001f Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36863 Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-11-16vboot: update commentPatrick Georgi
The comment in the source referred to an earlier approach, so update it to match current reality. Change-Id: I9a23ec0a719fb623cfd465c397ef7ef16550b93c Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36862 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
2019-11-15security/vboot: Remove flags from struct vboot_working_dataYu-Ping Wu
Since now we have persistent context, the usage of the flags can be replaced with vb2_context.flags. BRANCH=none BUG=chromium:1021452 TEST=emerge-kukui coreboot Change-Id: I8e5757a8cc09712c3acde9cbaab910b7498681b4 Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36808 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-11-15vboot: use vboot persistent contextJoel Kitching
vb2_context object is now stored on the workbuf as part of vb2_shared_data. Use vboot's new API functions vb2api_init and vb2api_relocate to create and move the workbuf. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:994060 TEST=Build locally BRANCH=none Change-Id: I051be1e47bf79b15a1689d49a5d4c031e9363dfa Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Also-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/chromiumos/third_party/coreboot/+/1902339 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36300 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Maulik V Vaghela <maulik.v.vaghela@intel.com>
2019-11-11security/vboot: Add rw_region_only support to vbootWim Vervoorn
In some case where the flash space is limited or when a large payload such as LinuxBoot is used, the RO region may not be large enough to contain all components that would normally be added. This patch adds the possibility to add specific components to the RW regions only in the same way as the RO_ONLY_SUPPORT does for the RO region. Please note: this applies only to the items that would normally be added to all regions. If the payload is directed to the RW region only, a recovery payload needs to be added to the RO region manually. BUG=N/A TEST=build Change-Id: Ie0df9b5dfc6df4f24efc5582a1aec9ecfb48c44d Signed-off-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36544 Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-11-07lib/cbfs: Add fallback to RO region to cbfs_boot_locateWim Vervoorn
With this change cbfs_boot_locate will check the RO (COREBOOT) region if a file can not be found in the active RW region. By doing so it is not required to duplicate static files that are not intended to be updated to the RW regions. The coreboot image can still be updated by adding the file to the RW region. This change is intended to support VBOOT on systems with a small flash device. BUG=N/A TEST=tested on facebook fbg1701 Change-Id: I81ceaf927280cef9a3f09621c796c451e9115211 Signed-off-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36545 Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-11-06security/vboot/Kconfig: Remove unused symbolsArthur Heymans
Change-Id: I417a2ff45b4a8f5bc800459a64f1c5a861fcd3d5 Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36605 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
2019-11-05security/vboot: Removed vboot_prepare from vboot_locatorWim Vervoorn
When prog_locate() is called in the stage VBOOT is starting from and the image to be loaded is not the target image vboot_prepare() may be called too early. To prevent this vboot_prepare() is removed from the vboot_locator structure. This allows more control over the start of the vboot logic. To clarify the change the vboot_prepare() has been renamed to vboot_run_logic() and calls to initialize vboot have been added at the following places: postcar_loader: when VBOOT starts in ROMSTAGE romstage_loader: when VBOOT starts in BOOTBLOCK ramstage_loader: when VBOOT starts in ROMSTAGE BUG=N/A TEST=tested on facebook fbg1701 Change-Id: Id5e8fd78458c09dd3896bfd142bd49c2c3d686df Signed-off-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36543 Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-10-27src/[northbridge,security]: change "unsigned" to "unsigned int"Martin Roth
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org> Change-Id: If6b5930f78c3da6dcefaa7b6202cd0424a24525b Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36331 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2019-10-27src: Use 'include <boot/coreboot_tables.h>' when appropriateElyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: I3d90e46ed391ce323436750c866a0afc3879e2e6 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36359 Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-10-18build: Mark bootblock files on x86 as IBBPatrick Rudolph
* Add cbfsoption --ibb to mark files as IBB * Will be used by "Legacy FIT TXT" boot Change-Id: I83313f035e7fb7e1eb484b323862522e28cb73d4 Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31497 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
2019-10-16vboot: add new vb2ex_abort callbackJoel Kitching
Required for new VB2_ASSERT and VB2_DIE macros in vboot code. (See chromium:972956.) BUG=b:124141368, chromium:1005700 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I61a1036ccab80862d6eb12f9f72286f29e8478cf Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36035 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-09-30vboot: create board-specific test-only GBB HWID if not setHung-Te Lin
The HWID in vboot GBB is an identifier for machine model. On Chrome OS, that should be provisioned in manufacturing process (by collecting real hardware information), and will be checked in system startup. For bring up developers, they usually prefer to generate a test-only string for HWID. However that format was not well documented and cause problems. Further more, most Chromebooks are using HWID v3+ today while the test-only HWID is usually v2. Non-Chrome OS developers may also prefer their own format. To simplify development process, the GBB_CONFIG now defaults to empty string, and will be replaced by a board-specific test-only v2 HWID automatically. Developers can still override that in mainboard Kconfig if they prefer v3 or other arbitrary format. BUG=b:140067412 TEST=Built 'kukui' successfully. Removed kukui GBB config and built again, still seeing correct test HWID. Change-Id: I0cda17a374641589291ec8dfb1d66c553f7cbf35 Signed-off-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35634 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2019-09-21vboot: extend BOOT_MODE_PCR to SHA256 bank on TPM2Andrey Pronin
With the support of various algorithms and banks in tlcl_extend(), digest_algo parameter of tpm_extend_pcr() started defining the target PCR bank in TPM2 case. The OS expects coreboot to extend the SHA256 bank of BOOT_MODE_PCR. The value that the OS expects coreboot to extend into BOOT_MODE_PCR is the SHA1 digest of mode bits extended to the length of SHA256 digest by appending zero bytes. Thus the correct value for digest_algo passed into tpm_extend_pcr() for BOOT_MODE_PCR is TPM_ALG_SHA256. This didn't matter until adding the support for multiple digest introduced by patches like https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33252, as tlcl_extend always used SHA256 bank before. Change-Id: I834fec24023cd10344cc359117f00fc80c61b80c Signed-off-by: Andrey Pronin <apronin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35476 Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-09-13security/vboot: Replace use of __PRE_RAM__Kyösti Mälkki
Change-Id: Ibaeda2762c733fdbe48979b635cc0cfd7ee4295d Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35387 Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-09-02vboot: remove fastboot supportJoel Kitching
Fastboot support in vboot_reference is unused, unmaintained, and produces compile errors when enabled. Since there is no current or planned use cases for fastboot, remove it. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:995172 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I06ea816ffb910163ec2c3c456b3c09408c806d0b Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35002 Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-08-21vboot: update vboot2 functions to use new vb2_error_tJoel Kitching
To make explicit when vboot2 error codes should be returned, use the new vb2_error_t type on all functions which return VB2_ERROR_* constants. Additionally, add required vboot submodule commit id e6700f4c: 2019-07-31 14:12:30 +0800 - (vboot: update vboot2 functions to use new vb2_error_t) NOTE: This patch was merged separately on the Chromium tree: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/c/1728499 BUG=b:124141368, chromium:988410 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I804c2b407e496d0c8eb9833be629b7c40118415c Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Cq-Depend: chromium:1728292 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34860 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-08-21vboot: use vboot2 API to set initial secdatak valueJoel Kitching
Previously, the initial value for secdatak was embedded in secdata_tpm.c as a uint8_t array. Switch to using vb2api_secdatak_create instead, and write the value in ctx->secdatak. Remove an unnecessary call to vb2api_secdata_create in _factory_initialize_tpm. BUG=b:124141368, chromium:972956 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none TEST=Check that size and value of initial secdatak has not changed. Apply the patch below and check for this output: _factory_initialize_tpm():266: _factory_initialize_tpm: secdatak sizes are identical? 1 _factory_initialize_tpm():269: _factory_initialize_tpm: secdatak values are identical? 1 diff --git a/src/security/vboot/secdata_tpm.c b/src/security/vboot/secdata_tpm.c index ff62185107..c1818b482f 100644 --- a/src/security/vboot/secdata_tpm.c +++ b/src/security/vboot/secdata_tpm.c @@ -148,6 +148,18 @@ static uint32_t write_secdata(uint32_t index, return TPM_E_CORRUPTED_STATE; } +/* + * This is derived from rollback_index.h of vboot_reference. see struct + * RollbackSpaceKernel for details. + */ +static const uint8_t secdata_kernel[] = { + 0x02, + 0x4C, 0x57, 0x52, 0x47, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0x00, 0x00, 0x00, + 0xE8, +}; + /* * This is used to initialize the TPM space for recovery hash after defining * it. Since there is no data available to calculate hash at the point where TPM @@ -250,6 +262,11 @@ static uint32_t _factory_initialize_tpm(struct vb2_context *ctx) * indication that TPM factory initialization was successfully * completed. */ + VBDEBUG("%s: secdatak sizes are identical? %d\n", __func__, + sizeof(secdata_kernel) == sizeof(ctx->secdatak)); + VBDEBUG("%s: secdatak values are identical? %d\n", __func__, + memcmp(secdata_kernel, ctx->secdatak, + sizeof(secdata_kernel)) == 0); RETURN_ON_FAILURE(set_kernel_space(ctx->secdatak)); if (CONFIG(VBOOT_HAS_REC_HASH_SPACE)) @@ -452,7 +469,7 @@ uint32_t antirollback_read_space_firmware(struct vb2_context *ctx) /* Read the firmware space. */ rv = read_space_firmware(ctx); - if (rv == TPM_E_BADINDEX) { + if (true) { /* * This seems the first time we've run. Initialize the TPM. */ Change-Id: I74261453df6cc55ef3f38d8fb922bcc604084c0a Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Cq-Depend: chromium:1652874, chromium:1655049 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33386 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-08-08vboot: fix conditional using vboot_setup_tpm return valueJoel Kitching
vboot_setup_tpm returns (TPM_SUCCESS == 0) on success. In this case, call antirollback_read_space_firmware. This regression was introduced in CB:34510. BUG=b:139101213 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ifdea1d85167a50a1ada5afe9b107408e3a2e0d6f Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34790 Reviewed-by: Subrata Banik <subrata.banik@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com> Reviewed-by: Ronak Kanabar <ronak.kanabar@intel.com> Reviewed-by: V Sowmya <v.sowmya@intel.com> Reviewed-by: caveh jalali <caveh@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-08-06security/vboot: Add Support for Intel PTTChristian Walter
Add support for Intel PTT. For supporting Intel PTT we need to disable read and write access to the TPM NVRAM during the bootblock. TPM NVRAM will only be available once the DRAM is initialized. To circumvent this, we mock secdata if HAVE_INTEL_PTT is set. The underlying problem is, that the iTPM only supports a stripped down instruction set while the Intel ME is not fully booted up. Details can be found in Intel document number 571993 - Paragraph 2.10. Change-Id: I08c9a839f53f96506be5fb68f7c1ed5bf6692505 Signed-off-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34510 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-07-29Revert "src/security/vboot: Add option to skip display init with vboot 2.0"Christian Walter
This reverts commit 598af2e2c2785c00eb4290cdcefe1082b2a6f858. Reason for revert: This commit breaks every board with VBOOT enabled if the platform is apollolake, broadwell, skylake, baswell, baytrails or icelake. The reason is, that the SoC selects VBOOT_MUST_REQUEST_DISPLAY by default, and this has a dependency now on VBOOT_MAY_SKIP_DISPLAY_INIT. This will only be auto-selected if it is a CHROMEOS platform. Change-Id: I3872d9aa993326ded135d8a5d950d5b1b1eddf34 Signed-off-by: Christian Walter <christian.walter@9elements.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34308 Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-07-23vboot: relocate call to vboot_save_recovery_reason_vbnvJoel Kitching
Relocate call to vboot_save_recovery_reason_vbnv and rename vb2_clear_recovery_reason_vbnv for consistency. BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I111cc23cf3d4b16fdb058dd395ac17a97f23a53f Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33551 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2019-07-23vboot: deprecate vboot_handoff structureJoel Kitching
vboot_handoff is no longer used in coreboot, and is not needed in CBMEM or cbtable. BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753 TEST=make clean && make runtests BRANCH=none Change-Id: I782d53f969dc9ae2775e3060371d06e7bf8e1af6 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33536 Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-07-07src/security/vboot: Add option to skip display init with vboot 2.0Sukerkar, Amol N
This config option, when set, will allow the platform to skip display initialization in normal (non-developer, non-recovery) mode. This allows platforms that do not implement firmware UI in normal mode to skip the display init in firmware. TEST=Set option CONFIG_VBOOT and clear CONFIG_VBOOT_MAY_SKIP_DISPLAY_INIT and the display should initialize in ramstage when platform boots. Set CONFIG_VBOOT and set CONFIG_VBOOT_MAY_SKIP_DISPLAY_INIT and the display initialization should be skipped in coreboot. Signed-off-by: Sukerkar, Amol N <amol.n.sukerkar@intel.com> Change-Id: Icadad6da34dcb817af02868e89a94ea62dbfa7b3 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33844 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-07-03vboot: Use CONFIG_VBOOT_MIGRATE_WORKING_DATA on all platformsJulius Werner
When we added CONFIG_VBOOT_MIGRATE_WORKING_DATA, the idea was that on some Arm platforms the original working data buffer was in SRAM, which stays accessbile for the whole runtime of the system. There is no reason to migrate it into CBMEM on those platforms because ramstage and the payload could continue to access it in SRAM. Now that we've had a couple of months of experience with this option, we found that most of our Arm platforms have some issue that requires migrating anyway, because BL31 often claims SRAM for itself and makes it inaccessible to the payload. On the remaining platforms, accessing SRAM from the payload is possible but still an issue, because libpayload doesn't have enough memory layout information to set up proper page tables for it, so we're accessing it uncached and at risk of alignment errors. Rather than having to figure out how to map the right SRAM range for every platform in the payload, let's just get rid of the option. memcpy()ing 12KB isn't worth this much hassle. Change-Id: I1b94e01c998f723c8950be4d12cc8f02b363a1bf Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33952 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
2019-06-27vboot: remove vboot_handoff stepJoel Kitching
Depthcharge no longer reads this data structure, and uses the vboot workbuf in vboot_working_data instead. Since vboot2 downstream migration is not yet completed, the vboot2 -> vboot1 migration code is still required, but has been relocated to depthcharge. BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753 TEST=make clean && make runtests BRANCH=none Change-Id: I769abbff79695b38d11fb6a93c2b42f64d4bafde Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33535 Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-06-21security/vboot: Remove useless 'const'Elyes HAOUAS
Change-Id: I3b5ca272abffe46c6a63251cf4905780f87a6836 Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33540 Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-06-21vboot: relocate code to log and clear recovery mode switchJoel Kitching
Logging and clearing the recovery mode switch doesn't have anything to do with vboot_handoff. Move it to the main verstage logic file. BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I2e74f3893463e43fe5fad4a8df8036560f34e0db Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33534 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
2019-06-21vboot: remove functions which read vboot_handoff.out_flagsJoel Kitching
These functions are no longer used and may be removed: * vboot_handoff_check_recovery_flag * vboot_get_handoff_flag BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ie05652ef1288eef74bd2e7e8bea79fd29d523859 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33533 Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-06-21vboot: remove vboot_handoff_get_recovery_reasonJoel Kitching
Two functions retrieve vboot recovery_reason: * vboot_handoff_get_recovery_reason * vboot_get_recovery_reason_shared_data Previously, when CBMEM comes online, a vboot_handoff data structure is created, and depending on the architecture, coreboot may eventually lose access to vboot_working_data. After implementing vboot_working_data CBMEM migration, vboot_working_data is always guaranteed to be accessible. vboot_get_recovery_reason_shared_data is corrected to also allow accessing vboot_working_data in ramstage and postcar. Now, vboot_handoff_get_recovery reason returning a valid recovery reason implies that vboot_get_recovery_reason_shared_data should *also* return a valid recovery reason. Thus we may remove the former. BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Iac216dc968dd155d9d4f8bd0f2dfd5034762f9a0 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33532 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-06-12vboot: recovery path should finalize work contextJoel Kitching
Recovery path should finalize work context, and trim vboot_working_data buffer_size. Otherwise, depthcharge ingests the full 12 KB workbuf in recovery path. BUG=chromium:972528, b:134893812 TEST=Build with vboot_reference CL:1584488. Check that USB disks are properly verified in recovery path. BRANCH=none Change-Id: Icf2600d2eb5d846a26aec35a153946dd2f7f128c Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33358 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-05-22post_code: add post code for failure to load next stageKeith Short
Add a new post code, POST_INVALID_ROM, used when coreboot fails to locate or validate a resource that is stored in ROM. BUG=b:124401932 BRANCH=sarien TEST=build coreboot for sarien and arcada platforms Change-Id: Ie6de6590595d8fcdc57ad156237fffa03d5ead38 Signed-off-by: Keith Short <keithshort@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32770 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
2019-05-22vboot: determine display init before recovery checkEric Lai
Display is required by recovery mode. Determine display init before recovery check. BUG=b:133197727,b:133175864 TEST=enter recovery mode, checked the display shows up Signed-off-by: Eric Lai <ericr_lai@compal.corp-partner.google.com> Change-Id: Id6ac611f51241373bca3e2b394a94dcd52d3fde7 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32906 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
2019-05-20security/vboot/vboot_crtm.h: Remove ENV_ for vboot_measure_cbfs_hook()Frans Hendriks
vboot_measure_cbfs_hook() is included when CONFIG_VBOOT_MEASURED_BOOT is enabled, but this function is defined as 0 in vboot_crtm.h using ENV_ Remove ENV_ for vboot_measure_cbfs_hook() function definition. This function is added to bootblock stage also. BUG=NA TEST=Build Google Banon and Google Cyan Change-Id: Ic62c18db09c119dfb85340a6b7f36bfd148aaa45 Signed-off-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32532 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-05-20vboot: save whether developer mode is enabledJoel Kitching
Save whether or not vboot has selected developer mode as a flag in vboot_working_data. Other coreboot code may access this flag without needing to consult vboot_handoff (which is in the process of being deprecated). BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ieb6ac4937c943aea78ddc762595a05387d2b8114 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32843 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-05-15vboot: remove OPROM-related codeJoel Kitching
As of CL:1605641, vboot2 code should be used for setting and checking display init state. Remove all vboot1 OPROM-related code, and use the vboot2 display init code which has already been added in previous commits. coreboot should not be reading vboot NVRAM flags directly. Remove the function vboot_wants_oprom(), and instead rely on display_init_required(), which uses the VBOOT_WD_FLAG_DISPLAY_INIT value stored in vboot_working_data.flags, initialized during verstage. Note that this means in the case of CONFIG_VBOOT=y, the return value of display_init_required() can only be trusted after verstage has been executed. This should not be a problem assuming that all display initialization occurs in ramstage. BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:948529 TEST=Build locally TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: Ic8f9dc5a3c7f1546a8fed82bde02be4d04568f8d Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Cq-Depend: chromium:1605641, chromium:1605525 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32723 Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
2019-05-15vboot: rename BOOT_OPROM_NEEDED to BOOT_DISPLAY_REQUESTJoel Kitching
Verified Boot OPROM code is being refactored. OPROM is being generalized into "display initialization". As such, the NVRAM request flag is being renamed from OPROM_NEEDED to DISPLAY_REQUEST. BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:948529 TEST=make clean && make test-abuild BRANCH=none Change-Id: I74374abf7d1deb594c073f7a4a76c9de46092143 Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com> Cq-Depend: chromium:1605640 Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32720 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
2019-05-10vboot: Turn vboot_logic_executed() into a static inlineJulius Werner
This patch moves vboot_logic_executed() (and its dependencies) into a header and turns it into a static inline function. The function is used to guard larger amounts of code in several places, so this should allow us to save some more space through compile-time elimination (and also makes it easier to avoid undefined reference issues in some cases). Change-Id: I193f608882cbfe07dc91ee90d02fafbd67a3c324 Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32716 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-by: Frans Hendriks <fhendriks@eltan.com>
2019-05-10vboot: Make vboot_logic_executed() a bit more preciseJulius Werner
This patch adds another check to vboot_logic_executed() to make sure we only do a runtime check for verstage_should_load() if CONFIG_VBOOT_RETURN_FROM_VERSTAGE is enabled. That's the only case where the stage that's loading the verstage can execute after verification has run (because the verstage will return to it when it's done). In the other case, the stage that loads verstage really just loads it and will never do anything again after hand-off, so it's guaranteed to always execute before verification. This change may allow extra dead-code elimination in some cases. Change-Id: I7019b6f7b0acfbf0a8173914b53364751b08f2cf Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32714 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
generated by cgit v1.2.3 (git 2.25.1) at 2024-11-20 11:31:29 +0000