coreboot.git - my copy of coreboot

Age	Commit message (Collapse)	Author
2015-10-31	tree: drop last paragraph of GPL copyright header	Patrick Georgi
	It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address. Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we imported) looks out for that. This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further editing. Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2015-05-21	Remove address from GPLv2 headers	Patrick Georgi
	As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons but because there are tools that look for them, and giving them a standard pattern simplifies things. However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a new lease, but can drop the address instead. util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that we may want to synchronize every now and then. $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, MA[, ]02110-1301[, ]USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]Suite 330, Boston, MA 02111-1307[, ]USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + $ find * -type f -a \! -name \.patch \ -a \! -name \_shipped \ -a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \ -a \! -name LGPL.txt \ -a \! -name COPYING \ -a \! -name DISCLAIMER \ -exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} + Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
2015-03-20	romstages: use common run_ramstage()	Aaron Durbin
	Instead of sprinkling the cbfs calls around (as well as getting return values incorrect) use the common run_ramstage() to perform the necessary work to load and run ramstage. Change-Id: I37b1e94be36ef7a43efe65b2db110742fa105169 Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8710 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2014-04-26	Rename coreboot_ram stage to ramstage	Furquan Shaikh
	Rename coreboot_ram stage to ramstage. This is done in order to provide consistency with other stage names (bootblock, romstage) and to allow any Makefile rule generalization, required for patches to be submitted later. Change-Id: Ib66e43b7e17b9c48b2d099670ba7e7d857673386 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5567 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
2013-07-15	beaglebone: Put some code in romstage.c so we can tell if it ran.	Gabe Black
	The placeholder code in beaglebone's romstage.c didn't do anything, it just immediately tried to load the RAM stage and jump into it. That doesn't currently work, and there's no indication whether you actually successfully got into the ROM stage or not. This change adds a few lines which initialize the console and say "Hi" so that we can tell that the ROM stage is running. Change-Id: I45a0908c3ac65b21e0e5020428696d2e54933d0e Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3581 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2013-07-10	ARMv7: De-uboot-ify Exynos5250 code	Stefan Reinauer
	When starting the Exynos5250 port, a lot of unneeded u-boot code was imported. This is an attempt to get rid of a lot of unneeded code before the port is used as a basis for further ARM ports. There is a lot more that can be done, including cleaning up the 5250's Kconfig file. Change-Id: I2d88676c436eea4b21bcb62f40018af9fabb3016 Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3642 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
2013-05-26	beaglebone: initial Kconfig and Makefiles	Gabe Black
	Initial structure of Beaglebone port Change-Id: Ia255ab207f424dcd525990cdc0d74953e012c087 Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org> Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/3279 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>