| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Change-Id: Ied455ff29b151fb5f4bca26a189b1d4104d8cede
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/80595
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <service+coreboot-gerrit@felixsinger.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Selects should be done in the Kconfig file instead of Kconfig.name and
not mixed over both files.
Change-Id: I73844dc4686dd014ec2209e296cc4aff47280e9f
Signed-off-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/75070
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
|
|
This board is similar to x11ssm-f but has a proprietary form factor with
NVMe and a single x16 slot (potentially bifurcated to 2x x8) and a x4
slot.
Change-Id: I53a0b6012ae64cf1ba4b625f11aaf771637307f3
Signed-off-by: Kieran Kunhya <kieran@kunhya.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/77610
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
|
|
The X11SSH-LN4F and X11SSH-F are very similiar. They both use the same
PCB and use the same Supermicro BIOS ID. The X11SSH-LN4F has 4 NICs in
difference to the X11SSH-F which only has 2 NICs. The two additional
NICs aren't populated on the X11SSH-F. Enable the PCIe root ports
connected to the two additional Intel NICs.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
Change-Id: Id4e66be47ceef75905ba760b8d5a14284e130f63
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51330
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
|
|
This adds another X11 series board, the X11SSH-F, which is similiar to
X11SSH-TF but differs in PCIe interfaces/devices, ethernet interfaces.
Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org>
Change-Id: I92c32bff861f0b5697aea52ff282fae76b3b78ac
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45229
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
|
|
This adds another x11 series board, the X11SSM-F, which is similiar to
X11SSH-TF but differs in PCIe interfaces/devices, GPIO settings and
Ethernet interfaces.
Change-Id: I24e6f0f41a844652f88b562285b26beef311a2c9
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35427
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Michael Niewöhner
|
|
Most of the X11 boards with socket LGA1151 are basically the same boards
with just some minor differences like different NICs (1 GbE, 10 GbE),
number of NICs / PCIe ports etc.
There are about 20 boards that can be added, if there is a community for
testing.
To be able to add more x11 boards easily like x11ssm (see CB:35427) this
restructures the x11ssh tree to represent a "X11 LGA1151 series". There
were multiple suggestions for the structure like grouping by series
(x10, x11, x...), grouping by chipset or by cpu family.
It turned out that there are some "X11 series" boards that are
completely different. Grouping by chipset or cpu family suffers from the
same problem. This is why finally we agreed on grouping by series and
socket ("X11 LGA1151 series").
The structure uses the common baseboard scheme, while there is no "real"
baseboard we know of. By checking images, comparing logs etc. we came to
the conclusion that Supermicro does have some base layout which is only
modified a bit for the different boards.
X11SSH-TF was moved to the variants/ folder with it's gpio.h. As we
expect the other boards to have mostly the same device tree, there is a
common devicetree that gets overridden by each variant's overridetree.
Besides that some very minor modifications happened (formatting, fixing
comments, ...) but not much.
Documentation is reworked in CB:35547
Change-Id: I8dc4240ae042760a845e890b923ad40478bb8e29
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35426
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
