Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
The processor P_BLK doesn't support throttling. This behaviour could be
emulated with SMM, but instead just update the FADT to indicate no support
for legacy I/O based throttling using P_CNT.
We have _PTC defined in SSDT, which should be used in favour of P_CNT by
ACPI aware OS, so this change has no effect on modern OS.
Drop all occurences of p_cnt_throttling_supported and update autoport
to not generate it any more.
Change-Id: Iaf82518d5114d6de7cef01dca2d3087eea8ff927
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34351
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
Set up generic decode ranges based on the devicetree settings.
Change-Id: Ie59b8272c69231d6dffccee30b4d3c84a7e83e8f
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33548
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
With the memory controller the separate sockets becomes a useless
distinction. They all used the same code anyway.
UNTESTED: This also updates autoport.
Change-Id: I044d434a5b8fca75db9eb193c7ffc60f3c78212b
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31031
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This is a merely cosmetic change.
Change-Id: If36419fbee9628b591116604bf32fe00a4f08c17
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31030
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
|
|
With commits 9987534 [southbridge/intel: Remove leftover TPM ACPI code]
and 66ce18c [soc/intel: Remove legacy static TPM asl code] removing
TPM ASL code from the southbridge's LPCB device, the LPC TPM chip driver
(drivers/pc80/tpm) must be added to devicetree in order to ensure the
new acpigen code is used to replace it.
Test: boot various google/samsung boards, verify SSDT created with
LPBC.TPM device and TPM visible to and usable by SeaBIOS and Linux
Change-Id: Iedaa01f26fb357914549bb3dda24b0bd6ef67480
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27786
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Instead of hardcoding the PCI mmio size read it from devicetree.
Set a default value of 2048 MiB and 1024MiB for laptops without
discrete graphics.
Tested on Sandybridge Lenovo T520.
Change-Id: I791ebd6897c5ba4e2e18bd307d320568b1378a13
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15140
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ibbb056ae209a16533757af925c8c833c94803834
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13662
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
Old igd.asl had inconsistent addresses (between _DOD and actual device)
and ghost devices. Any of those is enough to make brightness on windows
fail and make igd.asl out-of-ACPI-spec. Also old code favoured ridiculous
copying of the same thing 6 times per chipset. Leave only hooking up and
chipset-specific part in chipset directory. Move NVS handling and ACPI-spec
parts to a common file.
Change-Id: I556769e5e28b83e7465e3db689e26c8c0ab44757
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7472
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <edward.ocallaghan@koparo.com>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
|
|
On those chipsets the pins are just a legacy concept. Real interrupts are
messages on corresponding busses or some internal logic of chipset.
Hence interrupt routing isn't anymore board-specific (dependent on layout) but
depends only on configuration.
Rather than attempting to sync real config, ACPI and legacy descriptors, just
use the same interrupt routing per chipset covering all possible devices.
The only part which remains board-specific are LPC and PCI interrupts.
Interrupt balancing may suffer from such merge but:
a) Doesn't seem to be the case of this map on current systems
b) Almost all OS use MSI nowadays bypassing this stuff completely
c) If we want a good balancing we need to take into account that e.g.
wlan card may be placed in a different slot and so would require complicated
balancing on runtime. It's difficult to maintain with almost no benefit.
Change-Id: I9f63d1d338c5587ebac7a52093e5b924f6e5ca2d
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7130
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I04ed600796c55f5af4f0a07687f676e6484a9830
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7200
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Ability to choose compatibility mode is interesting for testing payloads and
OS for compatibility with older systems.
As per comments
"ide_legacy_combined # TODO: Does nothing since
generations, remove from sb code?"
The "combined" mode was removed. It wasn't used by any mobo and the code for
it is almost identical to IDE one other than few bits relating to interrupt
handling and ISA mode.
Change-Id: I407a8fac753b513812a86bef5abcf39c6d81472e
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4658
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
The name lapic_cluster is a bit misleading, since the construct is not local
APIC specific by concept. As implementations and hardware change, be more
generic about our naming. This will allow us to support non-x86 systems without
adding new keywords.
Change-Id: Icd7f5fcf6f54d242eabb5e14ee151eec8d6cceb1
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2377
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The name pci_domain was a bit misleading, since the construct is only
PCI specific in a particular (northbridge/cpu) implementation, but not
by concept. As implementations and hardware change, be more generic
about our naming. This will allow us to support non-PCI systems without
adding new keywords.
Change-Id: Ide885a1d5e15d37560c79b936a39252150560e85
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2376
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
A while back coreboot was changed to read the subsystem IDs from
devicetree.cb to allow each onboard PCI device to have its own
subsystem id. When we originally branched, this was not the case,
and the sandybridge/ivybridge mainboards have not been updated yet.
Also, drop the subsystem ID from Emerald Lake 2, since it's not a
Google device.
Change-Id: Ie96fd67cd2ff65ad6ff725914e3bad843e78712e
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1042
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
Change-Id: Ic93ad2749834c8f7a2ca1651d343561f2a496312
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/953
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|