| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
This to fix following error using Clang-16.0.0:
/cb-build/coreboot-toolchain.0/clang/LENOVO_W500/mainboard/lenovo/t400/static.c:135:22: error: implicit truncation from 'int' to a one-bit wide bit-field changes value from 1 to -1 [-Werror,-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion]
.backlight_enable = 0x01,
^~~~
/cb-build/coreboot-toolchain.0/clang/LENOVO_W500/mainboard/lenovo/t400/static.c:136:23: error: implicit truncation from 'int' to a one-bit wide bit-field changes value from 1 to -1 [-Werror,-Wsingle-bit-bitfield-constant-conversion]
.dock_event_enable = 0x01,
^~~~
Change-Id: Icd35224877fee355e1bbb8a8e838cb047604babb
Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/73810
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Singer <felixsinger@posteo.net>
|
|
`chip` entries always need a device node below them to actually get
hooked up.
Change-Id: Ib9e6019b6f316c1b176da1592514dcdcaf8c505a
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/57473
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The X200 would undock itself when waking up from S3, requiring a
physical reconnection before the dock would work again.
Similar to 4611ad8, this reintroduces h8_mb_init() for the X200. A hook
function h8_mb_init() will be called at the end of h8_enable(), in place
of the ancient h8_mainboard_init_dock().
This should fix the regression the X201 and T410 also suffered from for
the X200.
Change-Id: Icb6dd145e56b90e0e04133810c5e9ac7b641ad68
Signed-off-by: Kevin Keijzer <kevin@quietlife.nl>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51123
Reviewed-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Even though `device` entries are children of `chip` entries in the
devicetree source format, the chips in the translated C structures
are only hooked up to device nodes. Hence, to configure a chip in
a device- or overridetree, it always needs a `device` below it.
This should fix docking events for the X200 ThinkPad.
Change-Id: I561e7ae81f2e096a091868ce51daa1c8f66af067
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Found-by: Kevin Keijzer <kevin@quietlife.nl>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/51118
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Kevin Keijzer
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Stefan thinks they don't add value.
Command used:
sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool)
The exceptions are for:
- crossgcc (patch file)
- gcov (imported from gcc)
- elf.h (imported from GNU's libc)
- nvramtool (more complicated header)
The removed lines are:
- fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */")
-# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available
-/* This file is part of coreboot */
-# This file is part of msrtool.
-/* This file is part of msrtool. */
- * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in
-/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */
- * This file is part of the coreboot project.
- /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-## This file is part of the coreboot project.
--- This file is part of the coreboot project.
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project */
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-;## This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the
- * This file is part of the coreinfo project.
-## This file is part of the coreinfo project.
- * This file is part of the depthcharge project.
-/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */
-/* This file is part of the ectool project. */
- * This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- * This file is part of the libpayload project.
-## This file is part of the libpayload project.
-/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */
-## This file is part of the superiotool project.
-/* This file is part of the superiotool project */
-/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */
Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I7b7670bb541cf4814fd4958d5c0d8c68cbee80c2
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40085
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I426518e8e18de1c8efcfb7ecb0835df3e257dca1
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39608
Reviewed-by: Wim Vervoorn <wvervoorn@eltan.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Discussed in CB:36093, in the past many lenovo boards need to declare
an empty h8_mainboard_init_dock() to satisfy h8.c.
Now the confusing H8_DOCK_EARLY_INIT might be retired, and if a
mainboard needs dock init (done with h8_mainboard_init_dock() in the
past) in ramstage, (discussed in CB:4294 where H8_DOCK_EARLY_INIT is
introduced) it can just do it in its own chip_ops.enable_dev function.
Tested on X200. Testing on other affected targets may be necessary.
Change-Id: I5737406d1f6cb6e91b2e2fa349a206a3dba988d1
Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36385
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
If a device node should be enabled on some variants, but disabled on
others, it had better be declared as disabled (rather than absent) in
base device tree (rather than override tree for the variant disabling
it), and enabled in override tree for the variant needing it, so that
it does not need to be declared once more when adding another variant
with such node disabled.
Change-Id: I4b28360905ae38149ace9ac5d21cd6d5045b7584
Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36347
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
It is similar to X200s, with U-series CPU, slightly different gpio
setup, no docking support, and no superio chip.
Tested:
- CPU Core 2 Duo U9400
- Slotted DIMM 4GiB*2 from samsung
- Camera
- pci-e slots
- sata and usb2
- libgfxinit-based graphic init
- NVRAM options for North and South bridges
- Sound
- Thinkpad EC
- S3
- Linux 4.19.67-2 within Debian GNU/Linux stable, loaded from
Linux payload (Heads) and Seabios.
TODO: repurpose and/or rename flag H8_DOCK_EARLY_INIT (introduced in
CB:4294 ) for h8-using devices without a dock.
Change-Id: Ic6a6059ccf15dd2e43ed4fc490c1d3c36aa1e817
Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@hardenedlinux.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36093
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
