| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Every Lenovo Thinkpad includes a Trusted Platform Module, so we can enable
it for the sandy-/ivybridge platforms.
Change-Id: Icda443ba88c2a49a0033014ce7710dd607fa15dc
Signed-off-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10411
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
Not used anywhere.
Change-Id: I9bab092d285aaebdf9283ba08e23197f9785b3a6
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10329
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
|
|
Old igd.asl had inconsistent addresses (between _DOD and actual device)
and ghost devices. Any of those is enough to make brightness on windows
fail and make igd.asl out-of-ACPI-spec. Also old code favoured ridiculous
copying of the same thing 6 times per chipset. Leave only hooking up and
chipset-specific part in chipset directory. Move NVS handling and ACPI-spec
parts to a common file.
Change-Id: I556769e5e28b83e7465e3db689e26c8c0ab44757
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7472
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <edward.ocallaghan@koparo.com>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
|
|
Tested on T530, T430s.
Verified with lspci dump.
Change-Id: I45acadb0c55534a67f7ad3e7bd84f4482a4344d7
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9451
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <edward.ocallaghan@koparo.com>
|
|
Set correct gpio routing and enable bits for EC SMI gpio and EC WAKE gpio.
Verified with schematics.
Change-Id: Ie3b98c4456a870c881e7663b19eb8ca8e5564c5c
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8358
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
On those chipsets the pins are just a legacy concept. Real interrupts are
messages on corresponding busses or some internal logic of chipset.
Hence interrupt routing isn't anymore board-specific (dependent on layout) but
depends only on configuration.
Rather than attempting to sync real config, ACPI and legacy descriptors, just
use the same interrupt routing per chipset covering all possible devices.
The only part which remains board-specific are LPC and PCI interrupts.
Interrupt balancing may suffer from such merge but:
a) Doesn't seem to be the case of this map on current systems
b) Almost all OS use MSI nowadays bypassing this stuff completely
c) If we want a good balancing we need to take into account that e.g.
wlan card may be placed in a different slot and so would require complicated
balancing on runtime. It's difficult to maintain with almost no benefit.
Change-Id: I9f63d1d338c5587ebac7a52093e5b924f6e5ca2d
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7130
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
This implementation is more compact, unified and works with windows as well.
Tested under windows and under Debian GNU/Linux.
Change-Id: I585dec12e17e22d829baa3f2dc7aecc174f9d3b5
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7296
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Change-Id: I04ed600796c55f5af4f0a07687f676e6484a9830
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7200
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Change-Id: I80b7facfb9cc9f642dd1c766884dc23da1aab2c8
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6800
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I80f1e27268d0be58514d110611fd3c18cbe81829
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6895
Reviewed-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Change-Id: I804aff0fa53609e5fc70301053f075aa54b9bde5
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6893
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Idwer Vollering <vidwer@gmail.com>
|
|
As introduced in:
1783a3c ivybridge: LVDS gfx init.
The panel on the T530 is a AUO B156HW01 V.4, 40 pin LVDS (2 ch, 6-bit).
Tx parameters derived from datasheet table.
Change-Id: I2e3b56a2a3d1ede08a704b839cc11fe6d685cf5b
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/6395
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <gaumless@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
Step 2: change the Lenovo X230 code to adapt it to the new board's
hardware with the great guidance from Vladimir (phcoder) to find the
correct GPIO's.
The machine has:
- Chipset: Intel QM77
- GPU's: Intel Integrated HD Graphics
: Discrete NVIDIA NVS 5400M (1 GB VRAM) with Optimus Technology
Change-Id: Iee12c3edc22df4a7935b7fb7ff4a320c21c4239b
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5391
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
|
|
Step 1: copy all files unmodified from Lenovo X230. This makes it much
easier later to see how the two boards actually and deliberately differ
when porting bugfixes from one to the other.
Change-Id: I3151c7848440ea6c240b959379a8eb369d35f3de
Signed-off-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/5390
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
