Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
If unspecified, chipset code already uses 101, and 0x65 == 101.
Change-Id: I524ca492fa577003df23017756f74a455582132f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/55212
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
Most boards use `device lapic 0 on` with zero written in decimal.
For the sake of consistency, update the remaining boards to follow suit.
Change-Id: I1d3b1ac107e33aae11189cdd5e719b8e48b10f08
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54359
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Most boards use `device domain 0 on` with zero written in decimal.
For the sake of consistency, update the remaining boards to follow suit.
Change-Id: I6e2f0a19d57cfe6fc4e4ac4d14310133ad6b01d8
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54358
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
Most boards use `device cpu_cluster 0 on` with zero written in decimal.
For the sake of consistency, update the remaining boards to follow suit.
Change-Id: I083c8f8e9b38ddcc217dc8bf17ae3c9473ba77e9
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/54357
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
|
|
They aren't specific to AC power operation anymore. Also adapt autoport.
Change-Id: Ib04d0a08674b7d2773d440d39bd6dfbd4359e0fb
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49089
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
All mainboards use the same values for AC and battery, even desktop
boards without a battery. Use the AC values everywhere and drop the
battery values. Subsequent commits will rename the AC power options
accordingly, and will also clean up the corresponding acpigen code.
This is intentional so as to ease reviewing the devicetree changes.
Also update util/autoport accordingly.
Change-Id: I581dc9b733d1f3006a4dc81d8a2fec255d2a0a0f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49088
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
All boards currently have backlight on either LVDS or eDP.
Change-Id: I878bc7f1ff75a2b82b9556e855aff1d4d03e0268
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/45035
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
Use it wherever the standard numbers were copied to. Bit 31 is set
at runtime unconditionally, so we don't need it here.
Change-Id: I0d853c3b8250a2c7b2d1a91985a555e4b17ad76c
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39731
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The `link_frequency_270_mhz` setting was originally used by the native
graphics init code for Sandy/Ivy Bridge, which is long gone.
The value of this information (which board had it set) is questionable.
The only board that had an LVDS panel and set it to 0 was the ThinkPad
L520, where native graphics init was never reported to work. Also, the
native graphics init only used it for calculations, but never confi-
gured the hardware to use a specific frequency. A look into the docu-
mentation also doesn't reveal any straps that could be used to confi-
gure it.
Change-Id: Ieceaa13e4529096a8ba9036479fd84969faebd14
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39763
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I70eabc0b03709409d997ccbe8b8e257d68aec338
Signed-off-by: Peter Lemenkov <lemenkov@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37302
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
|
|
The processor P_BLK doesn't support throttling. This behaviour could be
emulated with SMM, but instead just update the FADT to indicate no support
for legacy I/O based throttling using P_CNT.
We have _PTC defined in SSDT, which should be used in favour of P_CNT by
ACPI aware OS, so this change has no effect on modern OS.
Drop all occurences of p_cnt_throttling_supported and update autoport
to not generate it any more.
Change-Id: Iaf82518d5114d6de7cef01dca2d3087eea8ff927
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <patrick.rudolph@9elements.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34351
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
With the memory controller the separate sockets becomes a useless
distinction. They all used the same code anyway.
UNTESTED: This also updates autoport.
Change-Id: I044d434a5b8fca75db9eb193c7ffc60f3c78212b
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31031
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This is a merely cosmetic change.
Change-Id: If36419fbee9628b591116604bf32fe00a4f08c17
Signed-off-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31030
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Tristan Corrick <tristan@corrick.kiwi>
|
|
* Move board specific SPI registers to devicetree
* Remove unused headers
* Remove obsolete methods
* Fix coding style
* Fix Thinkpad L520 SPI lvscc register
Except for Thinkpad L520, no functional change has been done,
just moving stuff around.
Change-Id: I692a5632030fe2fedbe9a90f86251000f1360fb2
Signed-off-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19494
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
s230u seems only have two sata ports: one for the 2.5in hdd and one for
msata. map 0x11 (port 0 & 4) enables hdd but not msata, and map 0x5
(port 0 & 2) enables both.
Change-Id: I1e9e96f0d0849b1e8c4e02aa4f686ceb5e10b3ab
Signed-off-by: Bill XIE <persmule@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19523
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
|
|
Created using autoport plus some manual work and copying from G505S to
account for the non-H8 EC.
This model uses the same ENE KB9012 EC as the G505S.
Tested:
- Mainboard variant with 8GB Elpida DDR3
- SeaBIOS payload
- Booting into Linux 4.9.6 with Debian/unstable installed on the
internal HDD/SDD slot
- Native raminit
- Both native VGA init and option rom VGA init
- Basic TPM functionality (auto-detection and RNG)
- Battery status readout
- Basic ACPI functions (power button event; power-off; reboot)
- thinkpad-acpi hotkey functions
- thinkpad-acpi LED control (red thinkpad LED)
- Suspend to RAM and resume works
- Mini displayport output works
Known issues:
- Patches needed for EC battery support
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/18348/
https://review.coreboot.org/#/c/18349/
- No thermal zone since temperature sensing is not H8-compatible
and needs to be reverse engineered.
Not tested:
- msata/wwan (probably works)
Signed-off-by: Tobias Diedrich <ranma+coreboot@tdiedrich.de>
Change-Id: I52bc4515277e5c18afbb14a80a9ac788049f485c
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18351
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|