| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Convert wtm2 board to use the broadwell soc chipset.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:28234
TEST=Build and boot on wtm2 with haswell and broadwell
CQ-DEPEND=CL:201067
CQ-DEPEND=CL:*164226
Original-Change-Id: Ifb0db15cc23a3b66430b32b2ad3f8ab2fb03c4c3
Original-Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/201070
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
(cherry picked from commit e1073c6e34ab2d436faf46dde5f6b3bf99692866)
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marc.jones@se-eng.com>
Change-Id: I925b91a8de980b1768f03eaee915a7fd91fbdbda
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/8001
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
The management engine is slow, requiring at least 500ms between
when the Dram Init Done message is sent (right after memory training)
to when the MBP will report that it is successfully cleared and
that the ME can finally be sent the EOP message.
Currently this is adding 100-150ms to the boot time. If we defer
waiting for the MBP Clear indicator until the finalize step we
can gain back that lost time.
boot on falco with SMI debugging enabled to
ensure that the ME is locked down in the finalize step:
Finalizing Coreboot
SMI# #0
SMI_STS: PM1 APM
ME: MBP cleared
ME: mkhi_end_of_post
ME: END OF POST message successful (0)
Change-Id: Icab4c8c8e00eea67bed5e8154d91a1eb48a492d1
Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/62633
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4375
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
This reverts commit ff81f50f0e4c068b64c4a5c7f5244196ecd24965.
Deferring this step until the finalize stage will allow us
to defer waiting for the MBP clear indicator and speeding
up the boot.
Change-Id: Ib8edffd06689e72875830cd68b5aedb7ac3b0559
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/62631
Tested-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Commit-Queue: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4373
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
Now that we have RW ramstage we don't need to have the
management engine lock down step done in a final SMM.
ME: mkhi_end_of_post
ME: END OF POST message successful (0)
PCI: 00:16.0: Disabling device
Change-Id: I9db4e72e38be58cc875c1622a966d8fcacc83280
Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://gerrit.chromium.org/gerrit/49757
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4153
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
Here's the great news: From now on you don't have to worry about
hitting the right io.h include anymore. Just forget about romcc_io.h
and use io.h instead. This cleanup has a number of advantages, like
you don't have to guard device/ includes for SMM and pre RAM
anymore. This allows to get rid of a number of ifdefs and will
generally make the code more readable and understandable.
Potentially in the future some of the code in the io.h __PRE_RAM__
path should move to device.h or other device/ includes instead,
but that's another incremental change.
Change-Id: I356f06110e2e355e9a5b4b08c132591f36fec7d9
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2872
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
This is mostly a copy of Whitetip Mountain 1 with specific GPIO
map for this Customer Reference Board (CRB).
This mainboard currently has basic funcionality and is able to
boot a Linux Kernel but many of the new Haswell ULT specific
devices are not yet enabled.
Change-Id: I999452d86f00a2c245fa39b1b76080f6a3b1e352
Signed-off-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2725
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
