| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Use the ACPI generator for creating the Chrome OS gpio
package. Each mainboard has its own list of Chrome OS
gpios that are fed into a helper to generate the ACPI
external OIPG package. Additionally, the common
chromeos.asl is now conditionally included based on
CONFIG_CHROMEOS.
Change-Id: I1d3d951964374a9d43521879d4c265fa513920d2
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15909
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
The only difference in this code on all our platforms is the array
describing the GPIOs. Hence, only keep that array in the mainboard
ChromeOS directory and move everything else to generic ChromeOS ACPI
code.
Change-Id: I9fc75842af64530c1255bea1c5f803c5316d6da6
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/1278
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
No part of ChromeOS seems to use the debug header description, so drop
it to make sure it does not get copied around wrongly.
Change-Id: Icb0baedbf6112f11289b2ddd9618a955a424ddf7
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/989
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
The Emerald Lake 2 CRB wasn't designed with ChromeOS in mind, so there aren't
any actual developer mode, recovery mode, or write protect switches, let alone
GPIOs to read them from. Instead, I've commandeered signals connected to GPIOs
which are for other things but which aren't used by hardware or, for instance,
the EC to do something Coreboot doesn't control.
The recovery mode switch is connected to GPIO 22 and is called BIOS_REC on the
schematic. The name is at least very reminiscent of the right thing even if
it's supposed to be used for something else. There's a jumper on the board
labelled J8G1 which can force the line to ground, and if not, there's a switch
on the front of the case which toggles its value. "RECOVER" is for recovery
mode and "KEEP" is for normal mode.
The developer mode switch is connected to GPIO 57 and is called SV_DET on the
schematic. It's connected to a jumper labelled J8E2 on the board and, as far as
I can tell, can't be controlled in any other way. When the jumper is in place
and the pins are shorted, developer mode is selected. When the jumper is
removed, normal mode is selected.
The write protect is connected to GPIO 48 which is called BIOS_RESP on the
schematic. It's connected to a jumper labelled J8E3 which, like j8E2, seems to
be the only way to control the line it's on. When the jumper is in place,
write protect is "disabled", and when it's in place it's "enabled" even though
there's no functional difference.
The input for the recovery mode switch was chosen because of the name it
already had on the CRB, BIOS recovery, and because there's a switch to control
it on the front of the case which makes it easy to get at. The jumpers for
developer mode and recovery mode were chosen because there weren't very many
options available, and of those these were next to each other which should
make them easier to find and work with. It might be a good idea to wire toggle
switches up to the pins of those jumpers so they'll be easy to identify, can
be labelled, and would be easier to work with than little jumpers in the
middle of the motherboard.
Change-Id: Ib2c3dc05077dacfbede596dae143ed81a99dbebd
Signed-off-by: Gabe Black <gabeblack@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/965
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
This adds support for Intel's Emerald Lake 2 board.
Change-Id: Ifaeeac9d52fe655324ee29df5f7187b89b35f73a
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/951
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
