summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/mainboard/ibm/e325/resourcemap.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2010-04-27Since some people disapprove of white space cleanups mixed in regular commitsStefan Reinauer
while others dislike them being extra commits, let's clean them up once and for all for the existing code. If it's ugly, let it only be ugly once :-) Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> Acked-by: Stefan Reinauer <stepan@coresystems.de> git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@5507 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2008-10-01The ARRAY_SIZE macro is convenient, yet mostly unused. Switch lots ofCarl-Daniel Hailfinger
code to use it. That makes the code more readable and also less error-prone. Abuild tested. Signed-off-by: Carl-Daniel Hailfinger <c-d.hailfinger.devel.2006@gmx.net> Acked-by: Peter Stuge <peter@stuge.se> git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@3624 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2004-04-27Fixed the device on bus 0 problem for IBM/E325. The structure ↵Li-Ta Lo
mainboard_ibm_e325_control is not actually defined in the mainboard.c. It was only declared in chip.h. Why gcc did not tell me this mistake and why gcc does not complain about define a structure twice ? git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@1539 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2004-04-26check in the current code for IBM/E325, can somebody help to fix it ?Li-Ta Lo
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@1538 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2004-03-19fixes for various wrong bitsRonald G. Minnich
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@1447 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1
2004-03-18e325 supportRonald G. Minnich
git-svn-id: svn://svn.coreboot.org/coreboot/trunk@1440 2b7e53f0-3cfb-0310-b3e9-8179ed1497e1