| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
The gpio table is only used by depthcharge, and depthcharge rarely
has a need for the "recovery" gpio. On a few boards it does use the
gpio as a signal for confirming physical presence, so on that boards
we'll advertise the board as "presence".
All these strings probably should have been #defines to help avoid
typos (e.g., the "ec_in_rw" in stout seems questionable since everybody
else uses "EC in RW").
Cq-Depend: chromium:1580454
BUG=b:129471321
BRANCH=None
TEST=Local compile and flash (with corresponding changes to depthcharge)
to 2 systems, one with a "presence" gpio and another without. Confirmed
that both systems could enter dev mode.
Change-Id: Id6d62d9e48d3e6646cbc1277ea53f0ca95dd849e
Signed-off-by: Matt Delco <delco@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32718
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
The "write protect" GPIO's cached value is never actually
read after entering depthcharge. Ensure the value from
get_write_protect_state() is being transferred accurately,
so that we may read this GPIO value in depthcharge without
resampling.
The cached value of the "recovery" GPIO is read only on certain
boards which have a physical recovery switch. Correct some of
the values sent to boards which presumably never read the
previously incorrect value. Most of these inaccuracies are from
non-inverted values on ACTIVE_LOW GPIOs.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:950273
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Ic17a98768703d7098480a9233b752fe5b201bd51
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Drop 'include <string.h>' when it is not used and
add it when it is missing.
Also extra lines removed, or added just before local includes.
Change-Id: Iccac4dbaa2dd4144fc347af36ecfc9747da3de20
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31966
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
The virtualized developer switch was invented five years ago and has
been used on every vboot system ever since. We shouldn't need to specify
it again and again for every new board. This patch flips the Kconfig
logic around and replaces CONFIG_VIRTUAL_DEV_SWITCH with
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_DEV_SWITCH, so that only a few ancient boards need to
set it and it fits better with CONFIG_PHYSICAL_REC_SWITCH. (Also set the
latter for Lumpy which seems to have been omitted incorrectly, and hide
it from menuconfig since it's a hardware parameter that shouldn't be
configurable.)
Since almost all our developer switches are virtual, it doesn't make
sense for every board to pass a non-existent or non-functional developer
mode switch in the coreboot tables, so let's get rid of that. It's also
dangerously confusing for many boards to define a get_developer_mode()
function that reads an actual pin (often from a debug header) which will
not be honored by coreboot because CONFIG_PHYSICAL_DEV_SWITCH isn't set.
Therefore, this patch removes all those non-functional instances of that
function. In the future, either the board has a physical dev switch and
must define it, or it doesn't and must not.
In a similar sense (and since I'm touching so many board configs
anyway), it's annoying that we have to keep selecting EC_SOFTWARE_SYNC.
Instead, it should just be assumed by default whenever a Chrome EC is
present in the system. This way, it can also still be overridden by
menuconfig.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:459701
Change-Id: If9cbaa7df530580a97f00ef238e3d9a8a86a4a7f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18980
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Instead of defining the same functions for reading/clearing boot-mode
switches from EC in every mainboard, add a common infrastructure to
enable common functions for handling boot-mode switches if
GOOGLE_CHROMEEC is being used.
Only boards that were not moved to this new infrastructure are those
that do not use GOOGLE_CHROMEEC or which rely on some mainboard specific
mechanism for reading boot-mode switches.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=abuild compiles all boards successfully with and without ChromeOS
option.
Change-Id: I267aadea9e616464563df04b51a668b877f0d578
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/17449
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
A long time ago many Chrome OS boards had pages full of duplicated
boilerplate code for the fill_lb_gpios() function, and we spent a lot of
time bikeshedding a proper solution that passes a table of lb_gpio
structs which can be concisely written with a static struct initializer
in http://crosreview.com/234648. Unfortunately we never really finished
that patch and in the mean time a different solution using the
fill_lb_gpio() helper got standardized onto most boards.
Still, that solution is not quite as clean and concise as the one we had
already designed, and it also wasn't applied consistently to all recent
boards (causing more boards with bad code to get added afterwards). This
patch switches all boards newer than Link to the better solution and
also adds some nicer debug output for the GPIOs while I'm there.
If more boards need to be converted from fill_lb_gpio() to this model
later (e.g. from a branch), it's quite easy to do with:
s/fill_lb_gpio(gpio++,\n\?\s*\([^,]*\),\n\?\s*\([^,]*\),\n\?\s*\([^,]*\),\n\?\s*\([^,]*\));/\t{\1, \2, \4, \3},/
Based on a patch by Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Booted on Oak. Ran abuild -x.
Change-Id: I449974d1c75c8ed187f5e10935495b2f03725811
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14226
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
This is an nvidia t210 based board.
This includes Chrome OS downstream up to Change-Id: Ic89ed54c.
Change-Id: I4d77659f4f2d21b1bbdcfc3467e1a166c02ddd47
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10635
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
