Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
INT_MODEL defined in ACPI 1.0 and renamed to reserved since V 2.0.
The value for this field is zero but 1 is allowed to maintain
compatibility with ACPI 1.0.
So set this value to zero as we are using greater version than ACPI 1.0.
Change-Id: I910ead4e5618c958a7989f4c309a3a4bb938e31a
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/29986
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: David Guckian
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I91b54b43c8bb5cb17ff86a6d9afa95f265ee49df
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31431
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
|
|
The assignment of header->checksum was in some cases done twice, or
unnecessarily split into two lines.
Change-Id: Ib0c0890d7589e6a24b11e9bda10e6969c7d73c56
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Neuschäfer <j.neuschaefer@gmx.net>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28988
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marc Jones <marc@marcjonesconsulting.com>
|
|
Most FADT report using ACPIv3 FADT table. Using the get revision
function keeps the table versions in sync.
Change-Id: Ie554faf1be65c7034dd0836f0029cdc79eae1aed
Signed-off-by: Marc Jones <marcj303@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/28277
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Marshall Dawson <marshalldawson3rd@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Haswell, Broadwell, Baytrail, and Braswell ChromeOS devices'
FADT version were incorrectly set to 3, rather than the correct
ACPI_FADT_REV_ACPI_3_0. The incorrect value resulted in these
devices reporting compliance to ACPI 2.0, rather than ACPI 3.0.
This mirrors similar recent changes to SKL and APL SoCs.
Test: boot any affected device and check ACPI version reported
vai FADT header using OS-appropriate tools.
Change-Id: I689d2f848f4b8e5750742ea07f31162ee36ff64d
Signed-off-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19498
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Philipp Deppenwiese <zaolin.daisuki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Alexander Couzens <lynxis@fe80.eu>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
As per discussion with lawyers[tm], it's not a good idea to
shorten the license header too much - not for legal reasons
but because there are tools that look for them, and giving
them a standard pattern simplifies things.
However, we got confirmation that we don't have to update
every file ever added to coreboot whenever the FSF gets a
new lease, but can drop the address instead.
util/kconfig is excluded because that's imported code that
we may want to synchronize every now and then.
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin St, Fifth Floor, Boston, *MA[, ]*02110-1301[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 51 Franklin Street, Suite 500, Boston, MA 02110-1335, USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 59 Temple Place[-, ]*Suite 330, Boston, MA *02111-1307[, ]*USA:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f -exec sed -i "s:Foundation, Inc., 675 Mass Ave, Cambridge, MA 02139, USA.:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
$ find * -type f
-a \! -name \*.patch \
-a \! -name \*_shipped \
-a \! -name LICENSE_GPL \
-a \! -name LGPL.txt \
-a \! -name COPYING \
-a \! -name DISCLAIMER \
-exec sed -i "/Foundation, Inc./ N;s:Foundation, Inc.* USA\.* *:Foundation, Inc. :;s:Foundation, Inc. $:Foundation, Inc.:" {} +
Change-Id: Icc968a5a5f3a5df8d32b940f9cdb35350654bef9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
|
|
This patch aligns baytrail to the new SoC header include scheme.
BUG=None
TEST=Tested with whole series. Compiled Rambi.
Change-Id: I0f0a894f6f33449756582eefa0b50bae545220db
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Original-Commit-Id: 1216a86538517c03a7e5bca547d08ff3dbcaa083
Original-Change-Id: If5d2a609354b3d773aa3d482e682ab97422fd9d5
Original-Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Original-Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/222026
Original-Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/9363
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@google.com>
|
|
The FADT for baytrail had incorrect offsets leading to
the kernel spewing a huge mess of ACPI errors. Fix these offsets
to be initialized in the chipset code.
BUG=chrome-os-partner:23505
BRANCH=None
TEST=Built and booted into kernel on rambi. Login screen comes up.
Change-Id: I89fc2a4fd800ff01cedf89b51cfb1369aceb9f03
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/175663
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4941
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
BUG=chrome-os-partner:23121
BRANCH=None
TEST=None
Change-Id: I283415be326e2d92e1e1bf7866954f17a7266edb
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://chromium-review.googlesource.com/171940
Reviewed-by: Bernie Thompson <bhthompson@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4865
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|