| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Tested by making lenovo x230 configurable despite pretty MRC bugs.
Change-Id: Ia2a123f24334f5cd5f42473b7ce7f3d77c0e65b7
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/13658
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com>
|
|
Not used anywhere.
Change-Id: I9bab092d285aaebdf9283ba08e23197f9785b3a6
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10329
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
|
|
Old igd.asl had inconsistent addresses (between _DOD and actual device)
and ghost devices. Any of those is enough to make brightness on windows
fail and make igd.asl out-of-ACPI-spec. Also old code favoured ridiculous
copying of the same thing 6 times per chipset. Leave only hooking up and
chipset-specific part in chipset directory. Move NVS handling and ACPI-spec
parts to a common file.
Change-Id: I556769e5e28b83e7465e3db689e26c8c0ab44757
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7472
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <edward.ocallaghan@koparo.com>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
|
|
On those chipsets the pins are just a legacy concept. Real interrupts are
messages on corresponding busses or some internal logic of chipset.
Hence interrupt routing isn't anymore board-specific (dependent on layout) but
depends only on configuration.
Rather than attempting to sync real config, ACPI and legacy descriptors, just
use the same interrupt routing per chipset covering all possible devices.
The only part which remains board-specific are LPC and PCI interrupts.
Interrupt balancing may suffer from such merge but:
a) Doesn't seem to be the case of this map on current systems
b) Almost all OS use MSI nowadays bypassing this stuff completely
c) If we want a good balancing we need to take into account that e.g.
wlan card may be placed in a different slot and so would require complicated
balancing on runtime. It's difficult to maintain with almost no benefit.
Change-Id: I9f63d1d338c5587ebac7a52093e5b924f6e5ca2d
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7130
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I04ed600796c55f5af4f0a07687f676e6484a9830
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7200
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Ability to choose compatibility mode is interesting for testing payloads and
OS for compatibility with older systems.
As per comments
"ide_legacy_combined # TODO: Does nothing since
generations, remove from sb code?"
The "combined" mode was removed. It wasn't used by any mobo and the code for
it is almost identical to IDE one other than few bits relating to interrupt
handling and ISA mode.
Change-Id: I407a8fac753b513812a86bef5abcf39c6d81472e
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4658
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
The name lapic_cluster is a bit misleading, since the construct is not local
APIC specific by concept. As implementations and hardware change, be more
generic about our naming. This will allow us to support non-x86 systems without
adding new keywords.
Change-Id: Icd7f5fcf6f54d242eabb5e14ee151eec8d6cceb1
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2377
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
The name pci_domain was a bit misleading, since the construct is only
PCI specific in a particular (northbridge/cpu) implementation, but not
by concept. As implementations and hardware change, be more generic
about our naming. This will allow us to support non-PCI systems without
adding new keywords.
Change-Id: Ide885a1d5e15d37560c79b936a39252150560e85
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2376
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
AKA Acer C7 Chromebook
See http://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/devices/acer-c7-chromebook.html
for more information. Thank you to Sage Electronic Engineering, LLC for
making this possible! http://www.se-eng.com/
Change-Id: Ic4e4d50045a82cbb82e1dea3cd5a04525a648612
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2026
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
