Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
<gpio.h> chain-include <soc/gpio.h>.
Change-Id: Ia57d5cd33c70b6a755babd4db56c64c0e3666f9f
Signed-off-by: Elyes Haouas <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/71817
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
The only purpose of mainboard_chromeos_acpi_generate()
was to pass cros_gpio array for ACPI \\OIPG package
generation.
Promote variant_cros_gpio() from baseboards to ChromeOS
declaration.
Change-Id: I5c2ac1dcea35f1f00dea401528404bc6ca0ab53c
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58897
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
|
|
This reverts commit adb393bdd6cd6734fa2672bd174aca4588a68016.
This relands commit 6260bf712a836762b18d80082505e981e040f4bc.
Reason for revert:
The original CL did not handle some devices correctly.
With the fixes:
* commit 36721a4 (mb/google/brya: Add GPIO_IN_RW to all variants'
early GPIO tables)
* commit 3bfe46c (mb/google/guybrush: Add GPIO EC in RW to early
GPIO tables)
* commit 3a30cf9 (mb/google/guybrush: Build chromeos.c in verstage
This CL also fix the following platforms:
* Change to always trusted: cyan.
* Add to early GPIO table: dedede, eve, fizz, glados, hatch, octopus,
poppy, reef, volteer.
* Add to both Makefile and early GPIO table: zork.
For mb/intel:
* adlrvp: Add support for get_ec_is_trusted().
* glkrvp: Add support for get_ec_is_trusted() with always trusted.
* kblrvp: Add support for get_ec_is_trusted() with always trusted.
* kunimitsu: Add support for get_ec_is_trusted() and initialize it as
early GPIO.
* shadowmountain: Add support for get_ec_is_trusted() and initialize
it as early GPIO.
* tglrvp: Add support for get_ec_is_trusted() with always trusted.
For qemu-q35: Add support for get_ec_is_trusted() with always trusted.
We could attempt another land.
Change-Id: I66b8b99d6e6bf259b18573f9f6010f9254357bf9
Signed-off-by: Hsuan Ting Chen <roccochen@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58253
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Karthik Ramasubramanian <kramasub@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
|
|
It's commented in <types.h> that it shall provide <commonlib/helpers.h>.
Fix for ARRAY_SIZE() in bulk, followup works will reduce the number
of other includes these files have.
Change-Id: I2572aaa2cf4254f0dea6698cba627de12725200f
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58996
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I9e7200d60db4333551e34a615433fa21c3135db6
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/58921
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
|
|
This reverts commit 6260bf712a836762b18d80082505e981e040f4bc.
Reason for revert: This CL did not handle Intel GPIO correctly. We need
to add GPIO_EC_IN_RW into early_gpio_table for platforms using Intel
SoC.
Signed-off-by: Hsuan Ting Chen <roccochen@chromium.org>
Change-Id: Iaeb1bf598047160f01e33ad0d9d004cad59e3f75
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/57951
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
vboot_reference is introducing a new field (ctx) to store the current
boot mode in crrev/c/2944250 (ctx->bootmode), which will be leveraged
in both vboot flow and elog_add_boot_reason in coreboot.
In current steps of deciding bootmode, a function vb2ex_ec_trusted
is required. This function checks gpio EC_IN_RW pin and will return
'trusted' only if EC is not in RW. Therefore, we need to implement
similar utilities in coreboot.
We will deprecate vb2ex_ec_trusted and use the flag,
VB2_CONTEXT_EC_TRUSTED, in vboot, vb2api_fw_phase1 and set that flag
in coreboot, verstage_main.
Also add a help function get_ec_is_trusted which needed to be
implemented per mainboard.
BUG=b:177196147, b:181931817
BRANCH=none
TEST=Test on trogdor if manual recovery works
Signed-off-by: Hsuan Ting Chen <roccochen@chromium.org>
Change-Id: I479c8f80e45cc524ba87db4293d19b29bdfa2192
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/57048
Reviewed-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Stefan thinks they don't add value.
Command used:
sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool)
The exceptions are for:
- crossgcc (patch file)
- gcov (imported from gcc)
- elf.h (imported from GNU's libc)
- nvramtool (more complicated header)
The removed lines are:
- fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */")
-# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available
-/* This file is part of coreboot */
-# This file is part of msrtool.
-/* This file is part of msrtool. */
- * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in
-/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */
- * This file is part of the coreboot project.
- /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-## This file is part of the coreboot project.
--- This file is part of the coreboot project.
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project */
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-;## This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the
- * This file is part of the coreinfo project.
-## This file is part of the coreinfo project.
- * This file is part of the depthcharge project.
-/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */
-/* This file is part of the ectool project. */
- * This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- * This file is part of the libpayload project.
-## This file is part of the libpayload project.
-/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */
-## This file is part of the superiotool project.
-/* This file is part of the superiotool project */
-/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */
Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I8076155330100982de82d410b6579ac99ed89e7b
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40187
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I09cc279b1f75952bb397de2c3f2b299255163685
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
wpsw_boot is deprecated in favour of wpsw_cur. As such,
coreboot no longer needs to share "write protect" GPIO
with depthcharge.
BUG=b:124141368, chromium:950273
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I2fcb7f82aa063fd72928171af5cbef0356ba620c
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Cq-Depend: chromium:2088434
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39318
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The gpio table is only used by depthcharge, and depthcharge rarely
has a need for the "recovery" gpio. On a few boards it does use the
gpio as a signal for confirming physical presence, so on that boards
we'll advertise the board as "presence".
All these strings probably should have been #defines to help avoid
typos (e.g., the "ec_in_rw" in stout seems questionable since everybody
else uses "EC in RW").
Cq-Depend: chromium:1580454
BUG=b:129471321
BRANCH=None
TEST=Local compile and flash (with corresponding changes to depthcharge)
to 2 systems, one with a "presence" gpio and another without. Confirmed
that both systems could enter dev mode.
Change-Id: Id6d62d9e48d3e6646cbc1277ea53f0ca95dd849e
Signed-off-by: Matt Delco <delco@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32718
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
This change fixes the following issues with EC_IN_RW signal:
1. EC_IN_RW is an input signal to the SoC. Configure it accordingly in
GPIO table for baseboard and bip.
2. GPIO_EC_IN_RW is passed in coreboot tables so that payload can
re-sample the GPIO at runtime.
BUG=b:110084012
TEST=Verified that EC_IN_RW signal is read correctly in depthcharge.
Change-Id: I1c5f5b4b914ced98e89a571dc398df5ba1fe8460
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27166
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Justin TerAvest <teravest@chromium.org>
|
|
Add octopus board using GLK soc. Copied base code from mainboard/intel/glkrvp.
TODO: Fix as per octopus schematic.
Change-Id: Ic8c25b3fafbfef31b8b3b802acb3bc53ee7146b6
Signed-off-by: Hannah Williams <hannah.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23685
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|