| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I8076155330100982de82d410b6579ac99ed89e7b
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40187
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I09cc279b1f75952bb397de2c3f2b299255163685
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
wpsw_boot is deprecated in favour of wpsw_cur. As such,
coreboot no longer needs to share "write protect" GPIO
with depthcharge.
BUG=b:124141368, chromium:950273
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I2fcb7f82aa063fd72928171af5cbef0356ba620c
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Cq-Depend: chromium:2088434
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39318
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
The gpio table is only used by depthcharge, and depthcharge rarely
has a need for the "recovery" gpio. On a few boards it does use the
gpio as a signal for confirming physical presence, so on that boards
we'll advertise the board as "presence".
All these strings probably should have been #defines to help avoid
typos (e.g., the "ec_in_rw" in stout seems questionable since everybody
else uses "EC in RW").
Cq-Depend: chromium:1580454
BUG=b:129471321
BRANCH=None
TEST=Local compile and flash (with corresponding changes to depthcharge)
to 2 systems, one with a "presence" gpio and another without. Confirmed
that both systems could enter dev mode.
Change-Id: Id6d62d9e48d3e6646cbc1277ea53f0ca95dd849e
Signed-off-by: Matt Delco <delco@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32718
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
This change fixes the following issues with EC_IN_RW signal:
1. EC_IN_RW is an input signal to the SoC. Configure it accordingly in
GPIO table for baseboard and bip.
2. GPIO_EC_IN_RW is passed in coreboot tables so that payload can
re-sample the GPIO at runtime.
BUG=b:110084012
TEST=Verified that EC_IN_RW signal is read correctly in depthcharge.
Change-Id: I1c5f5b4b914ced98e89a571dc398df5ba1fe8460
Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/27166
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Justin TerAvest <teravest@chromium.org>
|
|
Add octopus board using GLK soc. Copied base code from mainboard/intel/glkrvp.
TODO: Fix as per octopus schematic.
Change-Id: Ic8c25b3fafbfef31b8b3b802acb3bc53ee7146b6
Signed-off-by: Hannah Williams <hannah.williams@intel.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/23685
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
