| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
Not used anywhere.
Change-Id: I9bab092d285aaebdf9283ba08e23197f9785b3a6
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10329
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
|
|
Old igd.asl had inconsistent addresses (between _DOD and actual device)
and ghost devices. Any of those is enough to make brightness on windows
fail and make igd.asl out-of-ACPI-spec. Also old code favoured ridiculous
copying of the same thing 6 times per chipset. Leave only hooking up and
chipset-specific part in chipset directory. Move NVS handling and ACPI-spec
parts to a common file.
Change-Id: I556769e5e28b83e7465e3db689e26c8c0ab44757
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7472
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <edward.ocallaghan@koparo.com>
Reviewed-by: Timothy Pearson <tpearson@raptorengineeringinc.com>
|
|
On those chipsets the pins are just a legacy concept. Real interrupts are
messages on corresponding busses or some internal logic of chipset.
Hence interrupt routing isn't anymore board-specific (dependent on layout) but
depends only on configuration.
Rather than attempting to sync real config, ACPI and legacy descriptors, just
use the same interrupt routing per chipset covering all possible devices.
The only part which remains board-specific are LPC and PCI interrupts.
Interrupt balancing may suffer from such merge but:
a) Doesn't seem to be the case of this map on current systems
b) Almost all OS use MSI nowadays bypassing this stuff completely
c) If we want a good balancing we need to take into account that e.g.
wlan card may be placed in a different slot and so would require complicated
balancing on runtime. It's difficult to maintain with almost no benefit.
Change-Id: I9f63d1d338c5587ebac7a52093e5b924f6e5ca2d
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7130
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I04ed600796c55f5af4f0a07687f676e6484a9830
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/7200
Reviewed-by: Nicolas Reinecke <nr@das-labor.org>
Reviewed-by: Edward O'Callaghan <eocallaghan@alterapraxis.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
Ability to choose compatibility mode is interesting for testing payloads and
OS for compatibility with older systems.
As per comments
"ide_legacy_combined # TODO: Does nothing since
generations, remove from sb code?"
The "combined" mode was removed. It wasn't used by any mobo and the code for
it is almost identical to IDE one other than few bits relating to interrupt
handling and ISA mode.
Change-Id: I407a8fac753b513812a86bef5abcf39c6d81472e
Signed-off-by: Vladimir Serbinenko <phcoder@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/4658
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <patrick@georgi-clan.de>
|
|
Ladies and gentlemen, I'm very happy to announce coreboot support for
the latest and greatest Google Chromebook: The Chromebook Pixel.
See the link below for more information on the Chromebook Pixel, and
its exciting specs:
http://www.google.com/intl/en/chrome/devices/chromebooks.html#pixel
The device is running coreboot and open source firmware on the EC
(see ChromeEC commit for more information on that exciting topic)
Change-Id: I03d00cf391bbb1a32f330793fe9058493e088571
Signed-off-by: Stefan Reinauer <reinauer@google.com>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/2482
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
