Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I09cc279b1f75952bb397de2c3f2b299255163685
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
Load calibration params from flash. If the format of the params is
correct, use these calibration params for fast calibration to reduce the
bootup time.
Bootup time of DRAM partial calibration:
- 1,349,385 usecs with low frequency
- 924,698 usecs with middle frequency
- 1,270,089 usecs with high frequency
3,544,172 usecs in total.
Bootup time of DRAM fast calibration:
- 216,663 usecs with low frequency
- 328,220 usecs with middle frequency
- 322,612 usecs with high frequency
867,495 usecs in total.
BUG=b:139099592
BRANCH=none
TEST=Boots correctly on Kukui
Change-Id: I9ef4265dd369a1c276bb02294696556df927e7bc
Signed-off-by: Huayang Duan <huayang.duan@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35164
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Two fields of struct sdram_params are renamed for future CL of DRAM full
calibration. Field 'impedance' is also removed.
BUG=none
BRANCH=none
TEST=emerge-kukui coreboot
Change-Id: I2f9673fd5ea2e62ee971f0d81bdd12aaf565e31c
Signed-off-by: Yu-Ping Wu <yupingso@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/35738
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Support SANDISK SDADA4CR-128G, SAMSUNG KMDP6001DA-B425, KMDV6001DA-B620
EMCP LPDDR4X DDR bootup.
BUG=b:80501386
BRANCH=none
TEST=Boots correctly on EMCP DRAM
Change-Id: I7de4c9a27282d3d00f51adf46dcb3d2f3984bfff
Signed-off-by: Huayang Duan <huayang.duan@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33838
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
|
|
Support SAMSUNG KMDP6001DA-B425 and MICRON MT29VZZZAD8DQKSL EMCP LPDDR4X DDR
From the calibration log of MICRON MT29VZZZAD8DQKSL, we found
the begin pass range of RX window earlier than with other DDR type.
So need change the DQS starting offset to increase the scan range of RX window.
BUG=b:80501386
BRANCH=none
TEST=Boots correctly on EMCP DRAM
Change-Id: I5fcc8673a2fbd7ec3a8776ab61c57f8903ddda20
Signed-off-by: Huayang Duan <huayang.duan@mediatek.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32243
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Hung-Te Lin <hungte@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Huayang Duan <huayang.duan@mediatek.corp-partner.google.com>
|