Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Change-Id: I5bb1a819475383719dbda32d9b5fea63da1e6713
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40611
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: I90a3b2384797a15d5ac7f3cf9df808a5cfb1dc8c
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40178
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I09cc279b1f75952bb397de2c3f2b299255163685
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
wpsw_boot is deprecated in favour of wpsw_cur. As such,
coreboot no longer needs to share "write protect" GPIO
with depthcharge.
BUG=b:124141368, chromium:950273
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I2fcb7f82aa063fd72928171af5cbef0356ba620c
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Cq-Depend: chromium:2088434
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39318
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I5791fddec8b2387df5979adbb1a0fa64c5dd23ea
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/37522
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
|
|
Use explicit simple PCI config accessors here.
Change-Id: Ifa3814fdd7795479ca5fdbfc4deb3fe8db9805f3
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34519
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
The gpio table is only used by depthcharge, and depthcharge rarely
has a need for the "recovery" gpio. On a few boards it does use the
gpio as a signal for confirming physical presence, so on that boards
we'll advertise the board as "presence".
All these strings probably should have been #defines to help avoid
typos (e.g., the "ec_in_rw" in stout seems questionable since everybody
else uses "EC in RW").
Cq-Depend: chromium:1580454
BUG=b:129471321
BRANCH=None
TEST=Local compile and flash (with corresponding changes to depthcharge)
to 2 systems, one with a "presence" gpio and another without. Confirmed
that both systems could enter dev mode.
Change-Id: Id6d62d9e48d3e6646cbc1277ea53f0ca95dd849e
Signed-off-by: Matt Delco <delco@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32718
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
The "write protect" GPIO's cached value is never actually
read after entering depthcharge. Ensure the value from
get_write_protect_state() is being transferred accurately,
so that we may read this GPIO value in depthcharge without
resampling.
The cached value of the "recovery" GPIO is read only on certain
boards which have a physical recovery switch. Correct some of
the values sent to boards which presumably never read the
previously incorrect value. Most of these inaccuracies are from
non-inverted values on ACTIVE_LOW GPIOs.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:950273
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: Ic17a98768703d7098480a9233b752fe5b201bd51
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32233
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Currently only two devices make use of physical dev switch:
stumpy, lumpy
Deprecate this switch. If these devices are flashed to ToT,
they may still make use of virtual dev switch, activated
via recovery screen.
BUG=b:124141368, b:124192753, chromium:942901
TEST=util/lint/checkpatch.pl -g origin/master..HEAD
TEST=util/abuild/abuild -B -e -y -c 50 -p none -x
TEST=make clean && make test-abuild
BRANCH=none
Change-Id: I87ec0db6148c1727b95475d94e3e3f6e7ec83193
Signed-off-by: Joel Kitching <kitching@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31943
Reviewed-by: Simon Glass <sjg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Motivation is to reduce use of !__PRE_RAM__, it does not
mean ENV_RAMSTAGE but we also exclude ENV_SMM with the change.
Change-Id: I1f96bb8c055a3da63274e1ab7f7d4bc70867cbf1
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31930
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Drop 'include <string.h>' when it is not used and
add it when it is missing.
Also extra lines removed, or added just before local includes.
Change-Id: Iccac4dbaa2dd4144fc347af36ecfc9747da3de20
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/31966
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Werner Zeh <werner.zeh@siemens.com>
Reviewed-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I91158452680586ac676ea11c8589062880a31f91
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31692
Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
PCI config accessors are no longer indirectly included
from <arch/io.h> use <device/pci_ops.h> instead.
Change-Id: I2adf46430a33bc52ef69d1bf7dca4655fc8475bd
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/31675
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
Change-Id: I99b9c0452ed0e6d580edb5a4f3317d776085b382
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30399
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
We have init_bootmode_straps() defined for the same purpose.
Change-Id: Ia2692d8f8986247ea4ce889d6252d3c4c8b27bc4
Signed-off-by: Kyösti Mälkki <kyosti.malkki@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30398
Reviewed-by: Arthur Heymans <arthur@aheymans.xyz>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: Ib3aafcc586b1631a75f214cfd19706108ad8ca93
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29285
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Use of device_t has been abandoned in ramstage.
Use pci_devfn_t or pnp_devfn_t instead of device_t in romstage.
Change-Id: Ie0ae3972eacc97ae154dad4fafd171aa1f38683a
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/26984
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
This callback was only required for a single mainboard, and it can
easily be moved to mainboard-specific code. This patch removes it from
the global namespace and isolates it to the Jecht board. (This makes
it easier to separate vboot and chromeos code in a later patch.)
Change-Id: I9cf67a75a052d1c86eda0393b6a9fbbe255fedf8
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18981
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
|
|
The virtualized developer switch was invented five years ago and has
been used on every vboot system ever since. We shouldn't need to specify
it again and again for every new board. This patch flips the Kconfig
logic around and replaces CONFIG_VIRTUAL_DEV_SWITCH with
CONFIG_PHYSICAL_DEV_SWITCH, so that only a few ancient boards need to
set it and it fits better with CONFIG_PHYSICAL_REC_SWITCH. (Also set the
latter for Lumpy which seems to have been omitted incorrectly, and hide
it from menuconfig since it's a hardware parameter that shouldn't be
configurable.)
Since almost all our developer switches are virtual, it doesn't make
sense for every board to pass a non-existent or non-functional developer
mode switch in the coreboot tables, so let's get rid of that. It's also
dangerously confusing for many boards to define a get_developer_mode()
function that reads an actual pin (often from a debug header) which will
not be honored by coreboot because CONFIG_PHYSICAL_DEV_SWITCH isn't set.
Therefore, this patch removes all those non-functional instances of that
function. In the future, either the board has a physical dev switch and
must define it, or it doesn't and must not.
In a similar sense (and since I'm touching so many board configs
anyway), it's annoying that we have to keep selecting EC_SOFTWARE_SYNC.
Instead, it should just be assumed by default whenever a Chrome EC is
present in the system. This way, it can also still be overridden by
menuconfig.
CQ-DEPEND=CL:459701
Change-Id: If9cbaa7df530580a97f00ef238e3d9a8a86a4a7f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18980
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
Use the ACPI generator for creating the Chrome OS gpio
package. Each mainboard has its own list of Chrome OS
gpios that are fed into a helper to generate the ACPI
external OIPG package. Additionally, the common
chromeos.asl is now conditionally included based on
CONFIG_CHROMEOS.
Change-Id: I1d3d951964374a9d43521879d4c265fa513920d2
Signed-off-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/15909
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Duncan Laurie <dlaurie@chromium.org>
|
|
A long time ago many Chrome OS boards had pages full of duplicated
boilerplate code for the fill_lb_gpios() function, and we spent a lot of
time bikeshedding a proper solution that passes a table of lb_gpio
structs which can be concisely written with a static struct initializer
in http://crosreview.com/234648. Unfortunately we never really finished
that patch and in the mean time a different solution using the
fill_lb_gpio() helper got standardized onto most boards.
Still, that solution is not quite as clean and concise as the one we had
already designed, and it also wasn't applied consistently to all recent
boards (causing more boards with bad code to get added afterwards). This
patch switches all boards newer than Link to the better solution and
also adds some nicer debug output for the GPIOs while I'm there.
If more boards need to be converted from fill_lb_gpio() to this model
later (e.g. from a branch), it's quite easy to do with:
s/fill_lb_gpio(gpio++,\n\?\s*\([^,]*\),\n\?\s*\([^,]*\),\n\?\s*\([^,]*\),\n\?\s*\([^,]*\));/\t{\1, \2, \4, \3},/
Based on a patch by Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=Booted on Oak. Ran abuild -x.
Change-Id: I449974d1c75c8ed187f5e10935495b2f03725811
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/14226
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <dhendrix@chromium.org>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
A lot changed here between Chrome OS and upstream, and these changes are
needed to reflect that.
Change-Id: I7195861465388d0f6a7cb540ebf4e410e38c260a
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10723
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|
|
Taken from CrOS, including everything up to commit da4c33913.
Adapted to upstream.
Change-Id: I095e6726a220200ba17719fc05fcdc521da484e8
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10432
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|