| Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|---|
|
UART pad configuration should not be done in common code, because that
may cause short circuits, when the user sets a wrong UART index. Thus,
add the corresponding pads to the early UART gpio table for the board as
a first step. Common UART pad config code then gets dropped in CB:48829.
Also switch to `bootblock_mainboard_early_init` to configure the pads in
early bootblock before console initialization, to make the console work
as early as possible. The board does not do any other gpio configuration
in bootblock, so this should not influence behaviour in a negative way
(e.g. breaking overrides).
Change-Id: I62ffbe36bd7b7675aa0f41a8c6e9214d04ad4ae5
Signed-off-by: Michael Niewöhner <foss@mniewoehner.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/49428
Reviewed-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Stefan thinks they don't add value.
Command used:
sed -i -e '/file is part of /d' $(git grep "file is part of " |egrep ":( */\*.*\*/\$|#|;#|-- | *\* )" | cut -d: -f1 |grep -v crossgcc |grep -v gcov | grep -v /elf.h |grep -v nvramtool)
The exceptions are for:
- crossgcc (patch file)
- gcov (imported from gcc)
- elf.h (imported from GNU's libc)
- nvramtool (more complicated header)
The removed lines are:
- fmt.Fprintln(f, "/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */")
-# This file is part of a set of unofficial pre-commit hooks available
-/* This file is part of coreboot */
-# This file is part of msrtool.
-/* This file is part of msrtool. */
- * This file is part of ncurses, designed to be appended after curses.h.in
-/* This file is part of pgtblgen. */
- * This file is part of the coreboot project.
- /* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project.
-## This file is part of the coreboot project.
--- This file is part of the coreboot project.
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project */
-/* This file is part of the coreboot project. */
-;## This file is part of the coreboot project.
-# This file is part of the coreboot project. It originated in the
- * This file is part of the coreinfo project.
-## This file is part of the coreinfo project.
- * This file is part of the depthcharge project.
-/* This file is part of the depthcharge project. */
-/* This file is part of the ectool project. */
- * This file is part of the GNU C Library.
- * This file is part of the libpayload project.
-## This file is part of the libpayload project.
-/* This file is part of the Linux kernel. */
-## This file is part of the superiotool project.
-/* This file is part of the superiotool project */
-/* This file is part of uio_usbdebug */
Change-Id: I82d872b3b337388c93d5f5bf704e9ee9e53ab3a9
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/41194
Reviewed-by: HAOUAS Elyes <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: If85e246550abe323d6a2a7c6301e8e91858cbe3a
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40177
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I09cc279b1f75952bb397de2c3f2b299255163685
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
There was the potential for misuse of the override early GPIO table,
because if the override early GPIO table did not have a corresponding
entry in the base table, it would not get overridden, and there was
no way to know except manual inspection (this has already happened
here), so now all hatch mainboards are required to explicitly list out
all of their required early GPIOs.
TEST=booted several hatch boards, verified that they can communicate
with TPM and successfully train memory
Change-Id: I0552b08a284fd6fb41a09fef431a0d006b0cf0bd
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/34782
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
|
|
Ensure Kohaku GPIO pins are configured correctly w/r/t Hatch. Implement the
base/override model for GPIOs (regular and early). The 'hatch' baseboard
contains the base GPIOs, and variants can override individual pads.
BUG=b:129707481
BRANCH=none
TEST=Compiles for all variants.
Change-Id: Ie5c83a0538d367ea11e9499f21cea41891d7a78e
Signed-off-by: Tim Wawrzynczak <twawrzynczak@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32326
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Fagerburg <pfagerburg@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
|
|
Creating skeleton files and directories in mainboard for the new Hatch
board. This is to facilitate development for different parties
involved.
BUG=None
BRANCH=None
TEST=./util/abuild/abuild -p none -t google/hatch -x -a
Change-Id: I5fc60c178f83034abe5d846d0f4169072b66f448
Signed-off-by: Shelley Chen <shchen@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/30169
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aamir Bohra <aamir.bohra@intel.com>
|
