Age | Commit message (Collapse) | Author |
|
Done with sed and God Lines. Only done for C-like code for now.
Change-Id: If2b94a05ccbb3bead292713719fdc914d96dbd0f
Signed-off-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/40173
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Felix Held <felix-coreboot@felixheld.de>
|
|
They're listed in AUTHORS and often incorrect anyway, for example:
- What's a "Copyright $year-present"?
- Which incarnation of Google (Inc, LLC, ...) is the current
copyright holder?
- People sometimes have their editor auto-add themselves to files even
though they only deleted stuff
- Or they let the editor automatically update the copyright year,
because why not?
- Who is the copyright holder "The coreboot project Authors"?
- Or "Generated Code"?
Sidestep all these issues by simply not putting these notices in
individual files, let's list all copyright holders in AUTHORS instead
and use the git history to deal with the rest.
Change-Id: I09cc279b1f75952bb397de2c3f2b299255163685
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/39607
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Angel Pons <th3fanbus@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: David Hendricks <david.hendricks@gmail.com>
|
|
Change-Id: I9e71474bea61befd61900aff554f32f1bc782a77
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/33699
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Matt DeVillier <matt.devillier@gmail.com>
|
|
Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martin@coreboot.org>
Change-Id: I46d131f76ec930d2ef0f74e6eaabae067df10754
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/36330
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Patrick Rudolph <siro@das-labor.org>
|
|
This patch fixes up all code that would throw a -Wtype-limits warning.
This sometimes involves eliminating unnecessary checks, adding a few odd
but harmless casts or just pragma'ing out the warning for a whole file
-- I tried to find the path of least resistance. I think the overall
benefit of the warning outweighs the occasional weirdness.
Change-Id: Iacd37eb1fad388d9db7267ceccb03e6dcf1ad0d2
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/32537
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@google.com>
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
|
|
Change-Id: I3b852cae4ef84d257bf1e5486447583bdd16b441
Signed-off-by: Elyes HAOUAS <ehaouas@noos.fr>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/c/coreboot/+/29301
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
|
|
Change-Id: I6182da172ae2f4107a9b5d8190e4b3b10ed2f0b9
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.h@gmx.de>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/29048
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
|
|
Split `i2c.h` into three pieces to ease reuse of the generic defi-
nitions. No code is changed.
* `i2c.h` - keeps the generic definitions
* `i2c_simple.h` - holds the current, limited to one controller driver
per board, devicetree independent I2C interface
* `i2c_bus.h` - will become the devicetree compatible interface for
native I2C (e.g. non-SMBus) controllers
Change-Id: I382d45c70f9314588663e1284f264f877469c74d
Signed-off-by: Nico Huber <nico.huber@secunet.com>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20845
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
|
|
The Tegra210 SoC never had a proper cpu_reset() implementation, so it's
pointless to pretend there is one. Most ARM SoCs/boards only define
hard_reset() at the moment anyway, so let's stick with that.
Change-Id: I40f39921fa99d6dfabf818e7abe7a5732341cf4f
Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/19786
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org>
Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
Reviewed-by: Paul Menzel <paulepanter@users.sourceforge.net>
Reviewed-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philippe.mathieu.daude@gmail.com>
|
|
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address.
Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we
imported) looks out for that.
This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further
editing.
Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com>
Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
|
|
This is an nvidia t210 based board.
This includes Chrome OS downstream up to Change-Id: Ic89ed54c.
Change-Id: I8630e86a4b0e8756693f8989ce147d6d762cefe1
Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org>
Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10634
Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins)
Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>
|