summaryrefslogtreecommitdiff
path: root/src/mainboard/google/foster/chromeos.c
AgeCommit message (Collapse)Author
2017-11-22chromeec: Change the API for hostevent/wake masks to handle 64-bitFurquan Shaikh
ChromeEC is getting ready to bump up the hostevents and wake masks to 64-bits. The current commands to program hostevents/wake masks will still operate on 32-bits only. A new EC host command will be added to handle 64-bit hostevents/wake masks. In order to prevent individual callers in coreboot from worrying about 32-bit/64-bit, the same API provided by google/chromeec will be updated to accept 64-bit parameters and return 64-bit values. Internally, host command handlers will take care of masking these parameters/return values to appropriate 32-bit/64-bit values. BUG=b:69329196 Change-Id: If59f3f2b1a2aa5ce95883df3e72efc4a32de1190 Signed-off-by: Furquan Shaikh <furquan@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/22551 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2017-07-06mainboard/[g-l]: add IS_ENABLED() around Kconfig symbol referencesMartin Roth
Change-Id: I1f906c8c465108017bc4d08534653233078ef32d Signed-off-by: Martin Roth <martinroth@google.com> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/20343 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) <no-reply@coreboot.org> Reviewed-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@google.com>
2017-03-28vboot: Assume EC_SOFTWARE_SYNC and VIRTUAL_DEV_SWITCH by defaultJulius Werner
The virtualized developer switch was invented five years ago and has been used on every vboot system ever since. We shouldn't need to specify it again and again for every new board. This patch flips the Kconfig logic around and replaces CONFIG_VIRTUAL_DEV_SWITCH with CONFIG_PHYSICAL_DEV_SWITCH, so that only a few ancient boards need to set it and it fits better with CONFIG_PHYSICAL_REC_SWITCH. (Also set the latter for Lumpy which seems to have been omitted incorrectly, and hide it from menuconfig since it's a hardware parameter that shouldn't be configurable.) Since almost all our developer switches are virtual, it doesn't make sense for every board to pass a non-existent or non-functional developer mode switch in the coreboot tables, so let's get rid of that. It's also dangerously confusing for many boards to define a get_developer_mode() function that reads an actual pin (often from a debug header) which will not be honored by coreboot because CONFIG_PHYSICAL_DEV_SWITCH isn't set. Therefore, this patch removes all those non-functional instances of that function. In the future, either the board has a physical dev switch and must define it, or it doesn't and must not. In a similar sense (and since I'm touching so many board configs anyway), it's annoying that we have to keep selecting EC_SOFTWARE_SYNC. Instead, it should just be assumed by default whenever a Chrome EC is present in the system. This way, it can also still be overridden by menuconfig. CQ-DEPEND=CL:459701 Change-Id: If9cbaa7df530580a97f00ef238e3d9a8a86a4a7f Signed-off-by: Julius Werner <jwerner@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: https://review.coreboot.org/18980 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Aaron Durbin <adurbin@chromium.org>
2015-10-31tree: drop last paragraph of GPL copyright headerPatrick Georgi
It encourages users from writing to the FSF without giving an address. Linux also prefers to drop that and their checkpatch.pl (that we imported) looks out for that. This is the result of util/scripts/no-fsf-addresses.sh with no further editing. Change-Id: Ie96faea295fe001911d77dbc51e9a6789558fbd6 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/11888 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Alexandru Gagniuc <mr.nuke.me@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Ronald G. Minnich <rminnich@gmail.com>
2015-06-30google/foster: add new mainboardPatrick Georgi
This is an nvidia t210 based board. This includes Chrome OS downstream up to Change-Id: Ic89ed54c. Change-Id: I8630e86a4b0e8756693f8989ce147d6d762cefe1 Signed-off-by: Patrick Georgi <pgeorgi@chromium.org> Reviewed-on: http://review.coreboot.org/10634 Tested-by: build bot (Jenkins) Reviewed-by: Stefan Reinauer <stefan.reinauer@coreboot.org>